Posted on 09/06/2014 10:15:56 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
Love Ted.
Amazing that such a law hasn’t been in effect before this.....Maybe they didn’t want to arrest John Forbes Kerry?
My Guess is that the Democrats will block it.
That’ll work for future ones. Not much we can do to the ones already over there.
A couple of Brits I met in Starbux were so proud of Cameron because he said he would keep the jihadis from coming back home, but now what I read about it is more wishy-washy. He will do what he can, take steps, etc. I guess there were legal or even political challenges there.
The lefty press will accuse Republicans of doing this for precisely that reason, along with our other tricks.
Interesting that the losing of a couple of heads of their own group members will probably not deter them.
It’s my understanding that laws currently in force refer to,and recognize,certain acts to be “expatriating” acts (don’t know if that’s the right term).That means that even if your parents were born in the US and *you* were born in Hawaii if you take up arms against the US you lose your citizenship....even if that renders you “stateless”.
So if they have a stamp from any country in the ME they’d be refused entry back in the US?
No need for that just convict them of the treasonous deed they have done!
All these stupid bills, just enforce the laws on record.
Who could be against this bill?
Agreed. They should not be able to hire a taxi nor rent a camel either, for any reason.
Agreed. They should not be able to hire a taxi nor rent a camel either, for any reason.
Sen. Rand Paul is hammering his fellow senators for keeping billions in financial aid flowing to Egypt's military -- even as Cairo's security forces massacre anti-government activists. [by "anti-government activists" is meant church-burning Christian-murdering jihadists]
I said throughout the whole battle that shutting down the government was a dumb idea. Even though it did appear as if I was participating in it, I said it was a dumb idea. And the reason I voted for it, though, is that it's a conundrum. Here's the conundrum. We have a $17 trillion debt and people at home tell me you can't give the president a blank check. We just can't keep raising the debt ceiling without conditions. So unconditionally raising the debt ceiling, nobody at home wants me to vote for that and I can't vote for that. But the conundrum is if I don't we do approach these deadlines. So there is an impasse. In 2011, though, we had this impasse and the president did negotiate. We got the sequester. If we were to extend the sequester from discretionary spending to all the entitlements we would actually fix our problem within a few years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.