"What concerns me about this is companies marketing something expressly to allow people to hold themselves beyond the law" Translation: what concerns me is that market demand has resulted in some technology that would slow you from being able to assert their 4th Amendment rights (that pesky Constitution, ya know)
I guess today's government also objects to people being able to encrypt email...and people having the right to lock their houses...
To: markomalley
Obola’s feral government wants to know everything we think, do or say, yet we still aren’t allowed to see Obola’s real birth certificate or the video of Obola’s speech at the Rashid Khalidi event.
2 posted on
09/25/2014 6:32:08 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: markomalley
FBI chief: Sealed envelopes dangerous.
3 posted on
09/25/2014 6:32:19 PM PDT by
Defiant
(4 main US grps: conservatives, useless idiots (aka RINOs), marxists and useful idiots (aka liberals))
To: markomalley
He should have come out with a sad violin playing, with 8 or 9 weeping widows behind him.
“See?! This could be you! You phone encrypting MONSTER!”
4 posted on
09/25/2014 6:40:11 PM PDT by
christx30
(Freedom above all.)
To: markomalley
5 posted on
09/25/2014 6:41:34 PM PDT by
Brother Cracker
(You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
To: markomalley
“Comey did not cite specific past cases...”
Actually what he really meant was, “I just made this sh!t up to justify my otherwise indefensible claim. Hey, it works for DHS and DOD”.
6 posted on
09/25/2014 6:58:21 PM PDT by
RetiredTexasVet
(Every trash can has a lid, the DNC lid is Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (aka Debbie Dipsh!t))
To: markomalley
You can keep your smart phone, I’m perfectly happy with my “drooling moron” phone. All they would find on it would be text messages to my sister on how to make moms potato salad and pictures of my cats.
CC
7 posted on
09/25/2014 7:17:04 PM PDT by
Celtic Conservative
(tease not the dragon for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
To: markomalley
8 posted on
09/25/2014 7:17:59 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a Yup.statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: markomalley; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; ...
The FBI Director doesn't like Apple's new privacy policies. . . Oh, and Google's as well. . . Google? What privacy is that? PING!
Apple Privacy Policy Ping!
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
9 posted on
09/25/2014 7:39:00 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: markomalley
Beyond the law?
Since when privacy and equal defense was dead?
Like they always yield the right conclusions out of the information they get.
11 posted on
09/25/2014 7:59:56 PM PDT by
lavaroise
(A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
To: markomalley
Seems like the FBI wants to deprive us of our 5th amendment rights.
14 posted on
09/25/2014 8:38:42 PM PDT by
BuffaloJack
(Bomb ISIS; bomb them again; bomb them again; kill all survivors; take no prisoners.)
To: markomalley
perfect example of propaganda...create an issue that doesn’t exist...who TRUSTS what any OBAMA directed agency SAY is true ?
the FBI publically complaining isn’t PROVABLE...its all words....PROVE IT
To: markomalley
Neither iOS (Apple's ooerating system nor Andoid (Google's operating system), nor any third party security solutions that run on those OS's, such as Blackphone, offer
voice security. They can be hacked.
Only Blackberry offers voice security, either through Blackberry Enterprise server or with a Secusmart chip at both ends. Blackberry bought Secusmart last month. Angela Merkel uses A Blackberry Q10 smartphone with a Secusmart chip to avoid NSA snooping of her voice communications.
To: markomalley
We should absolutely ban encryption because some people will use it to conceal information about crimes.
Just like we should absolutely ban privately held firearms because someone might use one to commit a crime.
And right after that, we can ban all motor vehicles since people can use them to load up and haul off stolen goods.
And then we can ban telephones, radios, televisions, computers, newspapers, and books so that no one can disseminate hate speech.
(Do I NEED a /sarc here, really?)
22 posted on
09/26/2014 6:38:24 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
To: markomalley
...which he accused of marketing products that would let people put themselves beyond the law's lawless regime's reach.
23 posted on
09/26/2014 11:19:40 AM PDT by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
