Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We should indict her and then figure out if she’s guilty of anything.
2 posted on
11/25/2014 12:27:30 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I was listening to a talking head interview an “expert” who said the Ferguson prosecutor should have just presented the minimum evidence necessary to the Grand Jury to get an indictment, then the rest of the information could come out at trial. The prosecutor was negligent in performing a “document dump” on the Grand Jury instead.
Really?
3 posted on
11/25/2014 12:29:54 PM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
How about having only black police and black-only courts deal with districts that are majority black?
You know - separate but equal?
5 posted on
11/25/2014 12:31:51 PM PST by
PGR88
To: 2ndDivisionVet; Yo-Yo
So, the prosecuters should have acted unethically and only presented the perjured testimony so they could get an indictment and go on to a trial they knew they would lose?
Six years of this lying, dishonest, lawbreaking regime has really corroded this country.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He was reportedly seeking to defuse the highly charged situation in the wake of a white Ferguson, Missouri, police officer killing an unarmed black teenager. Er, right. Because that's the remit of every prosecutor/DA, isn't it?
7 posted on
11/25/2014 12:34:51 PM PST by
relictele
(Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let’s be real clear and shorten the authors point.
“The DA should have found something to charge the cop with. Hell, you can indict a ham sandwich. What was the problem here? I mean, we indicted a rugby team on total lies, evidence omission and PR extortion. What happened here?”
8 posted on
11/25/2014 12:34:57 PM PST by
Tenacious 1
(POTUS shall now be referred to as POPOF. President Of Pants On Fire.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A grand jury, even in the hands of ACLU `tard attorney will indict a box of chicken McNuggets.
AS the libtards like to say, `There was no there there.” Rooters should know this, but of course they plead stupid.
9 posted on
11/25/2014 12:36:13 PM PST by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
1. Allison Silver receives article from white house via secure server.
2. Adds name as Author, publishes.
3. Gets nominated for Pulitzer.
11 posted on
11/25/2014 12:39:12 PM PST by
Eddie01
(Liberals lie about everything all the time.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think it’s about time people re consider the motivations of the agitators.
To many of these people, they are in an openly declared race war with American main stream society of all races and they are using the system to spread propaganda to further their aims to win the war they have started.
There is no honesty or objectivity at work here and the agitators and their allies in the MSM are not honest brokers trying to fairly report the news.
Even after the tragedy last night in Ferguson, guys like George Stephanopolis are granting interviews to the community organizers who planned and executed the riots and who trained the rioters to continue their propaganda campaign of No Justice, No Peace which since they can and never will be satisfied that they have been granted suitable justice simply means that they are justified for their riots and will keep on rioting in the name of unobtainable cosmic justice.
12 posted on
11/25/2014 12:39:37 PM PST by
rdcbn
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“The Ferguson police let Browns body lie in the street for four and a half hours, an act that either reflected callous disregard for him as a human being or an inability to manage the situation.”
It shows that they did a meticulous investigation of the scene. She would rather they hurried and missed something?
13 posted on
11/25/2014 12:39:53 PM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(Life is good.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The guy who held the press conference should have listed that FACTS FIRST
Eyewitness #1 said....
Eyewitness #2 said...
etc etc
and THEN said “based on all of this their decision was not to indict”
The way he said “we went through the process and the did not indict” right in the middle was stupid.. I fully expected the new whorenalists to cut off the rest of the news brief right there, and go out to the looting
14 posted on
11/25/2014 12:43:08 PM PST by
Mr. K
(Palin/Cruz 2016)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The rights of the press to report on a sensational trial is not something that should be considered in any grand jury proceedings.
The press can get a job.
15 posted on
11/25/2014 12:45:18 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Ferguson police let Browns body lie in the street for four and a half hoursHe wasn't getting any deader.
16 posted on
11/25/2014 12:46:33 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wonder if she holds that same standard to Obama and Holder.
18 posted on
11/25/2014 12:53:54 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Ferguson police let Browns body lie in the street for four and a half hours, That is certainly more than enough reason to charge a cop with murder.
19 posted on
11/25/2014 1:00:28 PM PST by
Raycpa
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The bar for an indictment at the Grand Jury level is fairly low. The fact that they could not produce enough evidence to get an indictment means there is NO case here.
However, the race-baiters and other leftscum want a trial. Why? (1) To inflict pain on Office Wilson. (2) To create the opportunity for MORE riots when he is acquitted.
They are SCUM.
20 posted on
11/25/2014 1:01:15 PM PST by
piytar
(No government has ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Jonathan Gruber knows Allison Silver.
25 posted on
11/25/2014 1:39:07 PM PST by
TigersEye
(ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
27 posted on
11/25/2014 1:56:33 PM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
28 posted on
11/25/2014 2:00:39 PM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What a web of dis-information this writer is weaving. Just like the web of dis-information that was woven in the days after the shooting. The body was not moved because it was part of an active investigation of a
homicide, a homicide that involved a police shooting. In Stockton, CA, where there was a hostage shot in a horrendous bank robbery a few months ago, the hostage's body was left in place for many hours as the investigation proceeded to assure that all facts were collected, despite the family knowing who she was, where she was, and how horribly she had been killed. . . on a public street. The police did the best they could under exceedingly bad circumstances. Moving the body would obfuscate the evidence.
In the Stockton case, it turned out the woman had indeed been hit by police bullets as well. Nobody is rioting, nobody is burning businesses, nobody is demanding the officers involved be indicted. That woman was truly an innocent.
29 posted on
11/25/2014 2:49:47 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson