If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Barrio, ‘hood, getto....
Ask Norway.
“Instead of “no-go zones,” I propose “semi-autonomous sectors,” a term that emphasizes their indistinct and non-geographic nature”
And not for one second does he recognize the irony and moral surrender implied by using a more politically correct term to describe what was already correctly described as a no-go zone.
If these are the “brave men” that will defend western civilization, then we had all better plan on buying rugs and bowing toward mecca.
I do not know if there are no-go zones in Europe.
I do know that there are no-go zones in Houston and the no-go zones have absolutely nothing to do with Muslims. There are parts of Houston where I would not venture in broad daylight with a police escort.
Ooops, I was referring to ho gun zones
If they want to do their own thing they shouldn’t expect anyone to feed and shelter them.
I prefer a directive for those people living in said "no go zones" to leave to the Muslim country of their choice, prior to leveling the areas completely, preferably for redevelopment.
You want a no-go zone? Walk around Baltimore at night. Another place that comes close is the area of New Orleans adjacent to the French Quarter.
Try this here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQFcWGgPigE
Napalm bombs were made specifically for “No Go Zones”...
Trust me, they work!
That's a stupid name. If you look back in history, the first name assigned to anything usually turns out to be the most accurate. I guess this is because most names are initially assigned by people who see the obvious, and don't confuse themselves with convoluted thinking processes like political correctness, critical race theory and many other upside down-backward ass ideas. For example, I saw a guy on O'Reilly who has convinced himself that fighting against the Taliban victimizes them, and this victimization then justifies their atrocities.
It seems no-go zone is the most obvious term to use, then that's what we should stick to.
Of course there are ‘no go’ zones. Anybody that has ever been around one knows exactly what they are. Just because it is not officially labeled such by some government entity or official doesn’t make it any less true.
Whether a poorly chosen “no-go zones”, or Zones Urbaines Sensibles, or “semi-autonomous zones”, either term is trying to portray a feature common to all of them - Muslims immigrating to Europe NOT to enjoy or adopt western European values, but, to where possible, provide zones where non-western values are to be promoted and when possible imposed.