Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/09/2015 4:46:13 PM PST by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: Crazieman

It’s neutral in what is allowed for the Lib’s but not for anyone else ...


2 posted on 02/09/2015 4:47:54 PM PST by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

“Net neutrality” is to the Internet as the “Fairness Doctrine” was to talk radio. The purpose of the “Fairness Doctrine” was to shut down conservative talk radio. The purpose of “net neutrality” is to shut down conservative web activity.


3 posted on 02/09/2015 4:49:22 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (If obama speaks and there is no one there to hear it, is it still a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

Watch out for the warder boarding the Internet!


4 posted on 02/09/2015 4:49:48 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

There’s nothing about this that’s good for people. There’s certainly a lot about it that’s good for government.


6 posted on 02/09/2015 4:52:40 PM PST by Personal Responsibility (Changing the name of a thing doesn't change the thing. A liberal or a rose by any other name...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

Aijit Pai for President!


7 posted on 02/09/2015 4:57:32 PM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/ g g)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

It Neutralizes Conservatives


8 posted on 02/09/2015 5:00:07 PM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman
It will end up as one of those Orwellian progressive schemes in which real diversity will be shut down in the name of promoting diversity. Thus, conservative media will be harassed in favor of local programming involving leftist grievance politics.

We will be told that "underrepresented communities" (read, Leftist pressure groups) are entitled to more broadband space, and some rationalization will be put forth to make conservative groups pay the price, either via increased fees or regulation of their content.
9 posted on 02/09/2015 5:00:19 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

Just another assault on our rights. The regulation of the Internet is all about controlling free speech. Obama systematically uses government to attack conservatives and the American way of life. The IRS being the primary method thus far to attack political speech. He doesn’t have to worry about the MSM as they are in the tank for him. The current voice that makes print and cable media respond to his actions comes from the Internet.


10 posted on 02/09/2015 5:00:46 PM PST by ConservativeInPA (#JuSuisCharlesMartel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

The Obamacare of the Internet ? LOL


11 posted on 02/09/2015 5:02:31 PM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

Obamacare for the internet..


12 posted on 02/09/2015 5:07:43 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends







FREE REPUBLIC IS YOUR VOICE & FORUM!!

PLEASE MAKE YOUR DONATION
GO MONTHLY IF YOU POSSIBLY & RELIABLY CAN!
URGE YOUR FRiends TO DONATE & GO MONTHLY!!

13 posted on 02/09/2015 5:09:06 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

I want this tyrant politically neutered!! Where are the damned republicrats? They haven’t done $h!t on anything— illegal amnesty— nothing. Obamacare — NOTHING. They are impotent weaklings!!


14 posted on 02/09/2015 5:13:01 PM PST by iowacornman (Romney is the father of government health care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

Expecting the RINO / GOPe wing to roll over for this - actually, they probably support it and have been collaborating.


17 posted on 02/09/2015 5:45:00 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

Seems Ted Cruz was right again!

Who would’ve thunk it?!


18 posted on 02/09/2015 5:52:36 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman
waxenterror

Is there ANYTHING about this latest power grab that is REMOTELY Constitutional? Using a 1934 law meant for utilities as the 'excuse' nameless faceless unelected unaccountable bureaucrats seek to regulate a profoundly different invention that would not even exist until half a century from the law used. Not only that that but it stomps all over the First Amendment using fictional powers that the Supreme Court of FDR's whim made up out of thin air from the Commerce Clause. It's so outrageous a power grab even Obama's utterly corrupt stooges in the current Court of Supreme Whim could not muster up enough evil to stomach this blatant act of tyranny on previous attempts.

19 posted on 02/09/2015 5:53:00 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

So when the NEW AMERICAN HARD RIGHT WING takes control of FEDGOV, the FCC might just disappear like Nikolai Yezhov!


20 posted on 02/09/2015 6:00:47 PM PST by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

It’s as neutral as the government is, so not at all.


21 posted on 02/09/2015 6:06:28 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman
But will the republican congress stop obongo?

I wont hold my breath, so one has stopped him so far.

22 posted on 02/09/2015 6:21:35 PM PST by GregoTX (Remember the Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

This is the big fight until 2016. Internet liberty...


27 posted on 02/09/2015 7:01:10 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crazieman

The problem isn’t necessarily with the proposed ‘Net Neutrality’ regulations per se, but rather that the FCC wants to regulate the Internet like a public utility. They are merely using NN as the means to sneak the camel’s nose inside the the tent.

After they establish the precedent with NN, then the Feds can roll their sleeves up and really go to town. As public utilities, Comcast, TWC, etc., will be at the whim of the Feds just like any other public utility.

Expect to see the Fairness Doctrine resurrected (but not named as such), new anti-hate-speech regs, and other supressions of speech. Nothing is impossible at that point because they are now public utilities, so the First Amendment and other civil rights can now be trampled in the ‘public interest’.


29 posted on 02/09/2015 7:37:35 PM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson