Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Obama’s Immigration Order Was Blocked (by Former Appeals Circuit Judge)
WSJ ^ | Feb. 17, 2015 | By Michael W. McConnell

Posted on 02/21/2015 9:17:19 AM PST by 11th_VA

Late Monday night, a federal district court in Brownsville, Texas, entered an order prohibiting enforcement of the Obama administration’s program granting lawful status to some four million or five million undocumented aliens. Administration supporters immediately filled the airwaves with claims that the decision was a political stunt by a George W. Bush -appointed judge and would quickly be reversed.

They should read U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen ’s order.

(snip - good read)

Despite misleading claims by administration supporters that the order interferes with executive discretion to set enforcement priorities, the district court narrowly crafted its order not to touch on prosecutorial discretion.

The court order is explicitly confined to the grant of work authorization and affirmative benefits, which has never been part of prosecutorial discretion.

Administration lawyers pointed to five prior instances when presidents from Ronald Reagan to George W. Bush granted temporary status to certain classes of aliens without statutory authority.

The district court noted, however, that none of these instances was reviewed in court and that past executive actions cannot serve as precedent for future expansions of executive power.

(snip - good read)

... the administration cannot implement its unilateral DAPA program unless and until the decision is reversed on appeal by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals or by the Supreme Court. It will not be easy for the administration’s lawyers to persuade those courts that Judge Hanen got the law wrong.

Mr. McConnell, a former judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, is a professor of law and director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: 11th_VA

“Obama is going to get squeezed ... he’s going to lash out like a wounded animal now - you watch ...”

It’s already started! Just look at the White Hut $hitstorm over Netanyahu’s invitation to speak. Obola is like a little petulant child who’s used to “getting his way.” He thinks he’s a ruler not a president. We are entering very dangerous times for our country. Not so much for our internal problems, but rather for the weaknesses we are projecting to outsiders who’d like nothing better than to topple us or start a war with us while we are vulnerable due to our incompetent, unpatriotic leadership.


21 posted on 02/21/2015 9:53:40 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Just go to Google, enter the article’s title, click, and you have it.


22 posted on 02/21/2015 10:14:11 AM PST by libstripper (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

They don’t have the law on their side so they’re just making it up as they go along. Pathetic weasels, obama and his minions.


23 posted on 02/21/2015 10:35:29 AM PST by uncitizen (They demand we judge them by the color of their skin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
"Relying on the few honest judges who remain may not be enough."

And how many of the dishonest judges are in their jobs for life and are ready to wreck a future Conservative Administration?

24 posted on 02/21/2015 10:49:25 AM PST by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: I am Richard Brandon

If they win on amnesty there won’t be any future Conservative Administration.

Your point about the dishonest judges is precisely why we need an opposition party. Judges nominations for lifetime appointments should not be rubber-stamped. Lyndsay Graham and company rubber-stamped every one of those dishonest judges onto the bench.


25 posted on 02/21/2015 10:54:56 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace- No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

A McConnell that makes sense.


26 posted on 02/21/2015 12:47:05 PM PST by Defiant (Please excuse Mr. Clinton for his involvement with young girls. --Epstein's Mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
Obama is going to get squeezed ... he's going to lash out like a wounded animal now - you watch ...

I read on another thread yesterday that a FOX news contributor sais:

Obama has checkmated himself....

And this is the "smartest guy on the block"

In his own words:

"“I think that I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters,” Mr. Obama told Patrick Gaspard, his political director, at the start of the 2008 campaign, according to The New Yorker. “I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I’ll tell you right now that I’m going to think I’m a better political director than my political director.”

Obama learning how a coin toss works:


27 posted on 02/21/2015 1:31:50 PM PST by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

sais = said....sorry....fat fingers


28 posted on 02/21/2015 1:34:49 PM PST by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Don’t get too excited. This is the uniparty we’re talking about and they want amnesty. And what the uniparty wants, the uniparty almost always gets.

I reckon Congress will figure out some way to get ammesty notwithstanding the view of the courts.


29 posted on 02/21/2015 1:43:52 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (There is only one party, the uniparty, and corruption is its credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
States, The Natural Second Party
30 posted on 02/21/2015 1:45:17 PM PST by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thank you for a link to a version of the article that DOES NOT require a subscription to read.


31 posted on 02/21/2015 3:18:11 PM PST by upchuck (The current Federal Governent is what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent. WAKE UP!! Amendment V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

32 posted on 02/22/2015 12:07:32 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson