Posted on 02/21/2015 6:05:34 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Just wait until the FCC gets control of the internet. It’s been nice knowing y’all.
s/b
To the Editor:
Yet another brainless PBS/NPR drone regurgitated partisan talking points, and you should be ashamed of yourself for printing them.
You are right. That’s even worse than Mr Tin Can or Mr Harry Man (who was always being paged on the Akron Canton airport white courtesy phone in the mid 70s).
It does make you wonder if Peter’s brother is named Harry.
After Mark Twain spent an evening with Rudyard Kipling he stated, “Mr. Kipling knows everything a man can possibly know, and I know all the rest.”
Interesting. Searching for the author using - “peter kuntz” northglenn - results in Letters to the Editor this idiot has written, published in newspapers across the country.
Papers from Maine, Missouri, Utah, California, Texas, Wyoming, etc., have all published letters from “Peter”.
Basically they all say the same thing.
“They’ve modeled their denial campaign directly on big tobacco’s old denial that smoking causes lung cancer, fake “scientists” and all.”
Silly libtard, erf doesn’t have lungs, so people can’t catch global warming.
Say, Pete, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I can let you have for a song......
And why it's a big deal:
NYT SMEARS SCIENTIST WILLIE SOON FOR TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING
Yeah,we know about Nobel Prize winners. Absolute truth comes only from God & Scientific American may be well down the list for all I know.
So stop using fossil fuels, Peter, you little Greenie Kuntz...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
What a fracking retard! How's about a solar-powered chainsaw or a solar-powered backhoe?
Peter makes morons look like rocket scientists.
WarmGrubers.
Hits all of the editing points in an adequately crafted propaganda piece.
BUT Note: NOT ONE FACT in the entire thing. NOT ONE.
That piece is the equivalent of a guy dangling a stopwatch on a chain in front of your eyes. You are feeling very relaxed, very sleepy.
Once asleep, you’ll accept and do anything.
> Why do so many people disbelieve every scientific body in the world and every climate scientist publishing in peer-reviewed science journals
Because we compare the projected global warming temperatures to the actual temperature. It didn’t happen. The models are wrong. Joke’s over.
I have Read Scientific American in the 50 and 60s, and the crap they publish today is embarrassing.
The true ignorance of that letter is breathtaking.
Consensus science is not science. "Peer" reviews by incestuous small groups of hucksters reviewing each others' fraudulent manipulation of data is NOT science.
The Greatest minds in science of the last 300 years ALL agree on only one thing : The most honest and useful driving force in the advancement of science is...
SKEPTICISM...
AMEN!
With some notable exceptions, most of what has passed muster in “science” is things that people can reproduce.
I...have...accounted...for...all...of...reality...so...believe...me...
Four words in and you knew it’s a nutcase.
“Let’s stop listening and (and printing letters from) the misinformed...” Silencing other thoughts and opinions, eh? How communist...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.