Posted on 03/22/2015 1:24:34 AM PDT by Matt_DZ_PL
Russia has gone on the offensive in the Baltic, warning Denmark that if it joins Nato’s missile defence shield, its navy will be a legitimate target for a Russian nuclear attack.
“I don’t think that Danes fully understand the consequence if Denmark joins the American-led missile defence shield. If they do, then Danish warships will be targets for Russian nuclear missiles,” said Mikhail Vanin, the Russian ambassador to Denmark, to the Jyllands-Posten newspaper.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
Whew, had me worried. Us Danes are pretty much tired of being relocated Holland.
Just wait until Russia invades Poland. You'll change your tune.
Neither did Obama
Neither did Bugs Bunny. Jeepers.
Sorry, no intention to get you in Dutch.
I haven’t changed my tune on anything.
Your man isn’t as strong as you guys want to pretend that he is, and we need to stop this bleeding of our military that you and Obama and the left are doing.
Of course not, good comparison.
Well Obama is the one you were defending against being accurately characterized as a reckless monkey. (That wasn’t a pan of America as a whole)
Yet the military is still operating and moving forces and materials forward in Europe.
NATO and the United States will fight to defend NATO, it is the worst kind of enemy propaganda to try and assist the enemy by pretending differently.
I’m with Ted Cruz, send arms to Ukraine and be strong in the face of this Russian aggression.
And Barack Obama will do everything he can to stop it and that is quite a lot. You are dreaming if you believe anything other than that. You are also dreaming (and maybe projecting) when you take this as some personal wish that it was the case. No, it is only a wish that you face up to the challenges of reality. You cannot fight the war that isn’t, only the war that is. Self congratulatory yeehaw never won a war.
Actually these operations are currently taking place under Obama, as is the creation of the new rapid reaction force spearhead.
Do you want us to take a more aggressive posture against Russia? I do.
You’re saying Obama is a hawk after all?
Beware Greeks even when they bear gifts, in fact particularly when they do. Maybe Russia is a welcome distraction for him from something that matters even more, like militant Islam.
And don’t forget who gets to be CIC of that thing anyhow. Yeah, Big Ears! Till (if as is to be hoped) he is convicted or leaves voluntarily at the end of his term.
No, I was correcting your bizarre claim that Obama isn’t doing what he is doing, and I also said that I want us to take a more aggressive stance against Russia and support Cruz’s desire to sell weaponry to Ukraine.
I asked you “Do you want us to take a more aggressive posture against Russia?” and all I got was a bizarre and dishonest accusation from you about me calling Obama a hawk, is Obama being too hawkish for you in regards to Russia, or do you want him to be tougher and more aggressive against Russia?
I do.
You say I made a bizarre claim that Obama is acting like a destructive monkey on the international political scene?
Document that please, with references to all the pertinent global facts. One swallow does not a spring make, let alone a summer.
I am saying you are beating a chest that is well etiolated now. You are worse than an enemy, you are a friend of false hope.
People in hell also want ice water.
Man, your posts are just getting weirder and weirder and as usual, you seem to be arguing for a position that you won’t openly say what it is.
Do you support Ted Cruz on selling weapons to Russia, and do you want us to take a more aggressive posture against Russia?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.