Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charity watchdog dubs Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ (on watch list of problem n/p))
NYPOST.COM ^ | 4/26/15 | Isabel Vincent

Posted on 04/26/2015 6:22:47 AM PDT by Liz

The Clintons took in more than $140M in 2013 but spent just $9M on direct aid.....the bulk spent on travel, salaries and bonuses, with fat payouts going to family and friends. On 2013 tax forms, most recent available, they claim $30 million on payroll/employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent/office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fund-raising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. Significantly, none of the Clintons are listed on the payroll, except for first-class flights paid for by the Foundation.

The tax-exempt came under fire following reports that then-Secy of State Hillary Clinton allowed a Russian government enterprise to control 1/5 of all US uranium- producing capacity. Rosatom acquired Clinton crony Frank Giustra's Canadian firm--Giustra is a member of the Clinton board and pledged over $130M to the foundation. The Clintons failed to disclose millions in foreign donations from 2010-12 and is refiling five years’ worth of tax returns.

Charity Navigator refused to rate the Clinton Foundation because its “atypical business model doesn’t meet our criteria.” ...it put them on its “watch list' .... which includes Al Sharpton’s National Action Network which failed to pay payroll taxes for several years.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; benghazi; canada; charitynavigator; china; clintoncash; clintoncharity; clintoncharityfraud; clintoncrimefamily; clintonfoundation; clintonslushfund; election2016; hillaryclinton; hitlery; libya; moon; pages; peterschweitzer; peterschweizer; russia; southcarolina; space; spaceexploration; treygowdy; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: GOPJ
The Clinton's don't have to take salaries - they are reimbursed for ‘expenses’... No taxes with that system either...

Good point: credit cards, expense accounts, and reimbursement records need to be checked.

They claim they have 2000 people on the payroll----are these all actual people? Putting phantom employees in the payroll and sending their wages to a numbered bank account is a tried and true n/p skimming scam.

L/E should get ahold of: (1) copies of foundation checks, (2) wire transfers, (3) account statements, (4) invoices, (5) bills, (6) delivery tickets, (7) correspondence including e-mail, contracts, loan agreements, and, (8) any other books or records. L/E should also explore (a) monies paid to brokers, sub-brokers, (b) family members, (c) mortgage brokers, (d) financial managers, and, (e) real estate agents, brokers, and developers.

Banks holding foundation money should be scrutinized to determine if foundation banking practices harmed depositers, shareholders, banking clients.

L/E should scrutinize foundation bank accounts for suspicious activites: (A) large deposits, (B) funds transferred from one account into another, (C) frequent requests for withdrawals.

Bank records might also show diversions to secret LLC other accounts, say, campaign funding accounts.

Financial fraud can also be facilitated by withdrawals, gift cards purchases, credit card purchases and intrabank transfers from n/p accounts into personal accounts.

===================================================

A huge tipoff is whether Foundation bank withdrawals support luxurious lifestyle including payments for real estate, investment and stock holdings, jewelry, luxury vehicles, resort travel and gifts from luxury outlets for wives and mistresses.

I rest my case.

21 posted on 04/26/2015 7:44:08 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Liz
People here should read up on this notorious politician:

Willam Magear "Boss" Tweed

What Tweed and his associates did with New York City's Democratic Party political machine, Tammany Hall, between the early 1850's and 1870 is almost an EXACT duplicate of what the Clintons did with the Clinton Foundation--trading political favors in exchange for "donations," and the Clintons getting a cut of those "donations." It's very ironic that the Clinton Foundation is based in the same city that was the home to Tammany Hall and its notorious reputation.

22 posted on 04/26/2015 7:51:01 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Hang. Them. All.


23 posted on 04/26/2015 7:54:14 AM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I heard the Foundation employed 400...not 2000


24 posted on 04/26/2015 8:01:39 AM PDT by goodnesswins (I think we've reached PEAK TYRANNY now.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Thanks for the post, thread and all of your OUTSTANDING work, Liz. BTTT!


25 posted on 04/26/2015 8:02:18 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Seems NSA could have/get a lot if that info....if they weren’t on the payola


26 posted on 04/26/2015 8:03:32 AM PDT by goodnesswins (I think we've reached PEAK TYRANNY now.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I heard the Foundation employed 400...not 2000.

NY Post reported their investigation of records showed 2000.

Looks like you're onto something....phantom employees is a common n/p scam to skim off tax-free money.

27 posted on 04/26/2015 8:12:55 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Interesting.
Is the CGI based offshore?
I’m sure that would make investigations / legal action much more difficult.


28 posted on 04/26/2015 8:14:42 AM PDT by nascarnation (Impeach, convict, deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Yes...discrepancy in number makes a good question (and research point)...we will see iF anyone bothers to check


29 posted on 04/26/2015 8:15:40 AM PDT by goodnesswins (I think we've reached PEAK TYRANNY now.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Liz
I'm not defending the Clintons, but their stated reasons for refiling tax returns doesn't rise to the level of criminal behavior.

The stated discrepancy is "that government grants were mistakenly combined with all other contributions for three years."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/irswatch/2015/04/25/clinton-foundation-to-file-amended-returns-should-you/

Judge Jeannine said she knows of no one refiling tax returns who did not go to jail.

Sorry, but amending tax returns is not a criminal offense. I've done it, after discovering that my taxable income included paid moving expenses (increasing my tax), but that I didn't take advantage of the moving expense deduction to offset it. I got an additional tax refund as a result.

There are many problems with the Clinton's operation of their foundation, but as long as their non-charitable expenses were reported as taxable income by the recipients, it's unlikely the IRS will prosecute them for that.

It would be nice if someone at the IRS were to decide that the "charity" isn't a charity, and revoke their status -- retroactively. But, I don't know enough about the tax law to know if there are objective criteria, and whether the Clinton's foundation violate the criteria.

30 posted on 04/26/2015 8:20:31 AM PDT by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I heard Mr. Cozine is starting a hedge fund. And what was the amount he stole? A mere $1.6 BILLION dollars? It’s unreal the corruption in this country and what they get away with. And then once in a while they bust the lesser mortals for taking something like $50k to show “We are rooting out corruption”...It seems to me there’s a threshold, if someone steals above a certain amount then gee whiz it’s perfectly legal, especially if they are Democrat. I look at the case of Republican Bernard Kerik, the former Police commissioner of NYC and one of the most decorated cops in NYPD history. He was tapped to be the head of homeland security, but *gasp* it was found out he hired an illegal as a maid! And he misreported his taxes for one year and it was claimed he was taking free renovations to his house because obviously there is a time limit when contractors should be paid. If they aren’t paid in a certain amount of time, then it’s “free renovations”. My ass it was free, he did pay them but it didn’t matter. 4 years in jail for him!


31 posted on 04/26/2015 8:38:18 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 17 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Oh yeah and what was the Clintons daughter Howdy Doody paid for her 2 seconds of work on NBC? Something like $600,000? Gee, no shady dealings going on there. It was said she was paid that amount so NBC could get first dibs on interviewing Hitlery about her book, and being the grifter Hitlery is she welched and went to ABC. Basically the Clintons scammed NBC out of $600K.

http://pagesix.com/2014/08/29/chelsea-clinton-exits-nbc-news/


32 posted on 04/26/2015 8:42:41 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 17 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Liz

That says it all, and the bottom line is

... an ongoing criminal enterprise... the Clintons


33 posted on 04/26/2015 8:54:24 AM PDT by Spitzensparkin1 (Arrest and deport all illegal aliens. Americans demand those jobback!oorah, Arizona!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Separated at birth?


34 posted on 04/26/2015 8:57:56 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Liz
A huge tipoff is whether Foundation bank withdrawals support luxurious lifestyle including payments for real estate, investment and stock holdings, jewelry, luxury vehicles, resort travel and gifts from luxury outlets for wives and mistresses.

My guess is 'the foundation' has houses in different countries - staffed - and available for the Clintons and other foundation employees to use. Kind of like having a private resident in many foreign countries to use as a free hotel or 'base'. Also air fare would be covered on 'official business'... and as I mentioned - no taxes involved.

Often it's not the money liberal elites take in as much as it's the money they don't have to spend. IMHO Clintons have set up the ultimate retirement vacation slush fund of all time...

Also the Clintons are careful when it comes to 'letter of the law' and falling on the right side - even if their actions are unethical as hell.

Legal loopholes created by corrupt liberal elites have to be closed.

Hillary's probable a crook at heart - but she's a very careful one ...one who knows what legal lines must not be crossed. Or if crossed how to 'erase' all tracks. Oh - and by the way Liz - you are really good at some of this stuff...

35 posted on 04/26/2015 8:59:35 AM PDT by GOPJ (Dead Broke Hillary Dodged Sniper Fire With Her Immigrant Parents In Tuzla - Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

To add confusion and complexity, there are at least 2 different organizations:

Clinton Health Access Initiative

Clinton Foundation

Per the NYT, they operat(ed) independently of each other.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/25/us/politics/clinton-charities-review-tax-returns-amid-scrutiny-of-foreign-grants.html

==

Clinton Health Access Initiative website:
http://www.clintonhealthaccess.org/news-and-information

Under News and Information, the link to Financial Reporting FAQs isn’t currently working.

==

Clinton Foundation website:

Link to Annual and Financial Reports:

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/about/annual-financial-reports

[Tried to open the PDFs in several different browsers — couldn’t get them to open.]


36 posted on 04/26/2015 9:03:20 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Liz

All Clinton has to say is “It’s not my fault. I don’t take care of the books.”


37 posted on 04/26/2015 9:09:36 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Obama voters are my enemy. And so are RINO voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

According to the website glassdoor.com

Clinton Health Access Initiative had 60 salaried employees as of February 17, 2015

Clinton Global Initiative had 21 (no date given)

Clinton Foundation had 13 salaried employees as of November 3, 2014.

[I don’t have access to the ‘details’ on that website.]

==

The Weekly Standard has a graphic that shows some $2.9 in salaries for various Clinton Foundation employees. Salaries range from $484k to $160k.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/men-make-top-8-most-highly-compensated-clinton-foundation-employees_876054.html


38 posted on 04/26/2015 9:10:19 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple

Are you talking about Sean Hannity’s good friend Lanny Davis?


39 posted on 04/26/2015 9:10:48 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Obama voters are my enemy. And so are RINO voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liz
The Clintons took in more than $140M in 2013 but spent just $9M on direct aid.....

Less than 10% to direct aid. And I bet that even that measly $9M (out of $140M I mean..,) that went to direct aid is highly questionable.

40 posted on 04/26/2015 9:33:58 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Let us now try liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson