Conspiracy Tale at Arpaio Contempt Hearing

I too prefer Cruzâ€™ positions and recognize his intellect. But protecting the Constitution is more important.

No it isn't, at least not this tiny little piece of it which has already been raped by Obama.

As Lincoln said:

Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the constitution? By general law life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful, by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the constitution, through the preservation of the nation.

Seriously, there are far worse issues at stake here than that one. The judges likely to be appointed by Trump or Carson will probably be disasters. Cruz will at least appoint constitutional conservatives.

Ping to extensive Arpaio transcripts from recordings played at the trial last week on BirtherReport:

Revealed: Audio Recordings Of Sheriff Arpaio's

Informants And Lead Investigator Mike Zullo

Read more at # 80.

Thank you, Seizethecarp.

Rationalization is the water that has worn away The Rock and mere human Ideals usually don't stand a chance against it in the day to day arena.

Therefore, I'm trying to keep it more simple for my simple mind and go with Churchill's take on rationalization:

Churchill: "Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?"
Socialite: "My goodness, Mr. Churchill... Well, I suppose... we would have to discuss terms, of course..."
Churchill: "Would you sleep with me for five pounds?"
Socialite: "Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!"
Churchill: "Madam, we've already established that. Now we are haggling about the price"

Rationalization is the water that has worn away The Rock and mere human Ideals usually don't stand a chance against it in the day to day arena.

You only have half the equation. You must weigh the value of rationalizing why a technically eligibile candidate who will not repair more egregious damage to the constitution would be a better choice than one with an eligibility technicality but who will most definitely address far worse problems.

It is axiomatic that in our current situation we are going to get damage to constitutional principles. The question is do we accept the relatively minor damage, or do we accept the more serious damage caused by putting a more Liberal candidate into the position of nominating our federal judges. (Look up Trump's sister who is a federal judge to see what sort Trump would appoint.)

We can be prim and proper on the lesser questions while losing the bigger questions, but this would be a Pyrrhic victory.

I would also point out that "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."

At this point in our history, Insisting that we toss away the best candidate to adhere to a foolish consistency which has already been broken, is tantamount to tossing the baby out with the bathwater.

From the audio it appears Blixseth is talking about the passport breach in 2008. So it is not Romney but McCain and it is not birth certificates but passport records.

You seen this letter?

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/BLIXSETH-YELLOWSTONE-CASE-mike-flynn-letter-to-DOJ.pdf

Look at item 25 about the whistleblower.

“Throughout relevant time periods in this matter, a whistleblower on behalf of, and paid by Edra Blixseth hacked into the computers of Mr. Blixseth and his counsel. The hacked information was provided to a laundry list of Mr. Blixsethâ€™s â€œenemiesâ€ in a list created by Edra Blixseth. In June, 2012, the Whistle Blower severed their relationship. The Whistle Blower informed Mr. Blixseth that he and the DOJ had been hacking into Tim’s and Timâ€™s counsel’s emails; and he and the government were wiretapping their phone calls on behalf of Edra and Burkle. Edra had paid the Whistle Blower over $6.0M to conduct her requested hacking, at the rate of $100,000 per month from April, 2006 through January, 2009 plus millions in bonuses. The Whistle Blower and Mr. Blixsethâ€™s counsel have been attempting to secure immunity for the Whistle Blower for the past year to blow the whistle on this entire matter, but the Holder controlled DOJ has thwarted it at the risk of exposing their own corrupt conduct. (See Immunity Proffer and documents sent under separate cover.) In the event The Public Integrity Section gives immunity to the Whistle Blower will expose the entire YC scheme, the misconduct of Judge Kirscher in connection with very specific electronic evidence, and the criminal conduct of Burkle, Byrne and Schweitzer in their scheme to use the Montana Bankruptcy Court to perpetrate the â€œbrilliant but evil, billion dollar plan.â€

Sounds very familiar.

A released exhibit (2922) is a honey-do list for Montgomery from Zullo and Machiewicz.

Here are some interesting items they wanted him to provide:

11. Birth Certificate analysis for fraud.

12. IP address trail Hammer to BC Hawaii to CIA servers Indonesia.

13. Prove three different software versions were used on BC.

14. Provide proof CIA watermarks are contained in BC doc.

15. Provide other know CIA unrelated docs that contain same watermarks.

16. Fla. voter records prove vote tampering using Hammer on election night.

17. Embassy Codes Top secret encryption codes for forging government communications.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/290634472/PX-2922-2014-03-27-List-2-Mackiewicz-List

As near as I can tell he never provided any of it.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.