Posted on 11/24/2015 8:12:35 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
However, their playbook is not as powerful as it once was. The winds are changing.
It’s quite possible he might’ve had a high-powered telescope for viewing the WTC, and it was very clear that day. Unless I missed it, I didn’t see any quote from him stating he used binoculars.
This thread is a great example of why conservatism is losing.
A ‘conservative’ candidate is clearly winning the argument and you folks are arguing over meaningless minutia.
I don’t like Trump for President but he’s got the liberals on the ropes. So you all give the liberals a helping hand by arguing he couldn’t have seen what everyone knows happened.
buncha sheep, for Gods sake he’s the only one reminding the nation of what happened on 9/11
Forgive me if I cannot read correctly, but the CNN article said that’s where he lived and implied that’s where he was that morning. Or am I missing something.
Further, are you saying that the CNN article is wrong about the 4 vs 7 (as you claim) mile separation?
He might have one of these on top of the towers:)
I’m not going anywhere. I’ll be watching all the candidates closely until our primary in March, then voting for the one whom I think has the best chance of winning in November.
You sound like you don’t even want conversation that might make you think. We want the same outcome: Dems out of power. I’m just more determined to help it happen.
Trump is a true politician. He lies as well as any of them.
He couldn’t see anything from where he lived of people jumping
He 100% did not see thousands of Muslims cheering after 9/11. You don’t think his staff would be showing the videos if they really existed.
One of the great liars of our time.
Jackwagons
With a telescope or decent binoculars, it's quite obvious you would be able to see bodies falling from those buildings.
Of course, that doesn’t answer the question... but thanks for your input.
Years ago I saw someone fall out of a hot air balloon and it was about 4-5 miles away.
You could see them against the blue sky so yes you can it just depends on the contrast between the object and the background.
Everybody can argue over what they want, frankly. It’s called freedom - while we still have it.
Trump isn’t my first choice for sure - that’s Cruz. But as long as he can take the nomination away from Jeb Bush or any of the other media-supported GOP candidates, I am happy.
My only goal here now on this forum is to do anything and everything to keep a Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, John Kasich from getting the nomination.
He’ll get another 2 point poll embellishment bump.
“He 100% did not see thousands of Muslims cheering after 9/11. You donât think his staff would be showing the videos if they really existed.”
I saw it on news reports.
I know people who saw it in person.
You’re a liar.
Everybody who watched the events or the news that day saw the people jumping.
“My only goal here now on this forum is to do anything and everything to keep a Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, John Kasich from getting the nomination.”
Amen
I'm not familiar with New York so I certainly won't dispute the distance. And if Trump is...embellishing again then it still won't make a difference to his supporters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.