Socialist Sweep New Hampshire [SANDERS AND TRUMP]

American Thinker ^ | February 10, 2016 | C. Edmund Wright

[MARKUSPRIME]

Yawn

[VanDeKoik]

*rolleyes*

[1rudeboy]

[Fresh Wind]

I guess we’ll be seeing a lot of this stuff today. LOL!

[1rudeboy]

What, people who don’t read the column? It happens all the time.

[Fresh Wind]

It happens all the time.

Yes it does. And when it happens, I pull the little handle and the smelly stuff goes away.

[nathanbedford]

Only a few moments ago I posted the following reply to another thread:

If elected, Trump will not prove himself to be a stalwart conservative but a rank opportunist. We conservatives who blindly follow this narcissist will be crestfallen when the reality of serial betrayals sinks in.

[nathanbedford]

As it ex-pat living in Germany I inform you that my patriotism is genuine and your scurrilous attack on expat_panama is below the belt, off the mark, and typical of Trump supporters as they search all the dark corners of their souls in their obsession to ape their hero.

[maddog55]

Agree.. but for many it's:

[nathanbedford]

Thanks for letting me to ignore your boring commentaries.

God gave you a mouse so you can ignore my boring commentaries with a simple click. Enjoy life in your bubble.

[Caipirabob]

I’ve been here for years, and yet this election cycle I am feeling the contention between Freepers more keenly this year than ever. And it’s not simply a mouse click away. Flame wars to the left of me, noob trolls to the right and snappy comments all over. I mean, this is one of the most civil disagreements I’ve seen on this thread and I wish everyone behaved so well, but I just hope everyone’s still here once this is settled. I feel like some kid watching their folks fight and thinking they’re going to get a divorce.

Heck, I’m just happy the two top candidates are not GOPe weenies.

[1rudeboy]

Well, that’s one way of admitting that you don’t read anything.

[BobL]

“Socialist Sweep New Hampshire [SANDERS AND TRUMP]”

They both want BORDER SECURITY, albeit for somewhat different reasons.

So, if it takes a Socialist to bring us BORDER SECURITY, so be it.

[Yashcheritsiy]

This is a retarded article.

Seriously, it is retarded.

As in retarded-style retarded.

[1rudeboy]

Hey, here’s another “five” minutes you can’t get back. You’re a nobody on the internet, as am I, but I’ll tell ya’ . . . if you go after somebody for their screen name thinking you’re beating some sort of a manly chest, because you think you’re an American and they are not? LOL

[Yashcheritsiy]

They both want BORDER SECURITY, albeit for somewhat different reasons.

Yeah, but remember - part of what makes the kook element think Trump is a "socialist" is the fact that he wants border security. To these folks, if you're not some open-borders fanatic who truly believes in all that "free people can cross borders freely" and "we should have unfettered free movement of labour" nonsense, then you're a big-gummit lovin' socialist.