Posted on 02/27/2016 8:43:13 PM PST by Williams
The GOP always claims it can't do anything without controlling the presidency. But now McConell and the GOPe leadership are planning to run against their own presidential candidate if it's Trump.
So how will they have any credibility that they plan to achieve anything if they are accepting the election of Hillary Clinton?
It seems to me if they don't want the presidency there will be no reason for the republican base to reelect them in Congress, and they will be finished.
It's tragic these idiots would rather run against their own nominee than the democrat.
Like Megyn Kelly they treat the DNC with respect and dignity while attacking conservatives.
No one bought the lie in the first place.
“:^)
Deal! LOL
Have a good one.
“So how will they have any credibility that they plan to achieve anything if they are accepting the election of Hillary Clinton?”
“It’s tragic these idiots would rather run against their own nominee than the democrat.”
The question is easy to answer. They are not republican.
Just like the Pope and the Bush’s, they are liberal frauds that have
infiltrated the party to undermine it. The New World Order
will be a fascist world government and that cant happen
as long as the United States exists as founded.
The republican party is nothing more than a false front of opposition to a fascist coup.
Open Range with Robert Duvall and Kevin Costner. Love that movie.
If she’s not in bed with the GOPe I’ll eat my Stetson.
The word that best describes McConnell is “toady”.
CC
Glenn Beck covered this very well on his 1 hour television Show Feb 26, 2016.
It is why this time no matter what we eliminate the rino/goper/vichy republican leadership now.
The Problem with the GOPe is “Progressiveness” the main keystone of progressivism is to “Manage the people” they by definition can never trust the people to lead their own lives.
If they think that people cannot manage their own lives, what makes you think they trust the people to pick their leaders?
Just a few years ago the GOP had the House, and the Senate, and the Presidency.
What did the GOP do with all of that?
Beck is a loon, he is crazy so I am not going to believe anything he says!!! He is a mormon so we should discount anything he says cause thinks he is from planet kolob, blah blah blah...
(See how this brainwashing from the MSM and subtle social media manipulation has sunk in to influence us to keep us away from people who hold some of the pieces of the puzzle. I dare say even Free Republic isn’t free from this subtle manipulation, divide and conquer plays from the elite)
The GOP-e would likely do the same if it looked like Cruz was going to be the nominee. They know either Cruz or Trump will clamp down on their waste of taxpayers’ dollars.
Yes. /sarc. Re read post 32 with sarcastic glenn voice please.
Those sources really do hit the nail on the head. You should check out those links.
Could be he doesn't want the majority in Congress, or the White House...It's no coincidence they vote with the Democrats every time...As the majority they are expected to do differently and they still side with the Democrats...No doubt life was easier for them when the Democrats were in control...
The Republican party suffers the curse of the Whigs.
It began with Andrew Jackson, who so hated big business that the big business interests and the wealthy formed the Whig party. It being the only alternative, it became the nucleus for everyone opposed to Jackson and his schemes.
But the big business interests maintained control of the party, much like the GOP-e, RINOs, establishment Republicans and Country Club Republicans do today. At the same time, the rank and file of the Whigs became increasingly dissatisfied with the Whig leadership, which eventually came into clear focus.
As far as the leadership then and now are concerned, “The business of America is business”, an expression coined by Calvin Coolidge. But this attitude hit a stone wall on the issue of slavery. The Whig leadership could not bring itself to oppose slavery, because slavery “was good for business.” The rank and file were utterly opposed to it.
Then, as now, the leadership refused to cede power to the rank and file, so that the nation’s pressing interests could be dealt with. Then, the rank and file had no choice but to form their own party, the Republican party, and leave the wealthy few behind, as the Whigs rapidly withered.
Eventually the Whigs had no choice but to join the Republicans, then immediately began plotting their scheme to again become the leaders.
Today, the rank and file of the Republicans are in the same quandary, but instead of forming a new party, we are slowly trying to purge the Whigs from the leadership of the Republican party. Once conservatives control the Republican party, we must very thoroughly purge every trace of the Whigs. Not an easy task.
While today the issue is not slavery, it is almost as bad. This is because the Whigs have lost their national loyalty, both to America and its people. Instead they embrace internationalism in the form of multinational corporations, that also do not respect America or Americans. Between the two, they now work *against* America, as deplorable a thing as supporting slavery.
Today their goal is a “new world order” which amounts to a corporatocracy. A plutocracy of billionaires, who imagine themselves as “the new nobility”, running the corporations that run a gigantic, faceless bureaucracy, which in turn rule over everyone else who they consider peasants.
Not being utter fools, they see socialists as fools, and they actually approve of socialism in so far as it saves them money. Taxing the peasants to pay for their own needs, so that corporations don’t have to. Other than that, they want no corporate taxes from anyone, and resent the notion that they have to pay to rule, which they figure is their by divine right.
They approve of open borders solely to get the cheapest possible work force. And yes, if they could, they would be in favor of a return of slavery.
Because slavery “is good for business”. Fie on them.
You're assuming he gives a rat's behind about having a majority - he sure isn't making effective use of the one he has now....
You mean like the SS did? Yes, let’s go back to the good ‘ol days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.