Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton Apologizes For Praising Nancy Reagan (on the day of her funeral)
The Daily Caller ^ | 3/11/16 | Alex Pfeiffer

Posted on 03/11/2016 2:42:50 PM PST by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: lee martell

Must have missed her nap.


21 posted on 03/11/2016 2:54:13 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is more than a psychopath, Hillary is pure evil.


22 posted on 03/11/2016 2:55:08 PM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media. #2ndAmendmentMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; Old Sarge; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; freeangel; kalee; TWhiteBear; ...

23 posted on 03/11/2016 2:57:49 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

She missed her nap or her afternoon dose of Zoloft.
Do not double-up in case of missed doses, Mrs. Clinton.


24 posted on 03/11/2016 2:58:38 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: notdownwidems
AIDS was called GRID initially.

Even homosexuals knew it as "gay cancer" in the early 80s.

It was obvious to anyone with a brain that it was transmitted sexually, and in 99% of the cases it was gay men.

Once HIV infected donated blood entered the general population, it now became something everyone *could* get.

But still to this day it is a gay male disease.

At least in the developed world.

And really, what could have been done about it to stop it?

Uh, don't receive unprotected anal intercourse.

Was that just too difficult to understand?

I guess so, because gays blamed Reagan because an instant cure wasn't available.

As if they'd take sex tips from an old fogey president.

25 posted on 03/11/2016 3:02:01 PM PST by boop ("A Republic, if you can keep it."-Franklin, 1787. "We couldn't keep it"-America, 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I doubt anyone is going to have to apologize for praising this obnoxious b__ch when she dies, because no one will.


26 posted on 03/11/2016 3:04:12 PM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fhios
I was there in the 80’s. It came out [aids]. It was talked about. It was diagnosed and means of transmission accurately described. Nobody was trying to hide anything except for the homosexual connection.

When the disease was first noticed it was called GRIDS (Gay Related Immunodeficient Disease). Because it was almost completely restricted to the homosexual community.

The name was quickly changed. Because it was too accurate.

27 posted on 03/11/2016 3:04:50 PM PST by Samwell Tarly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

Me too. Lost a classmate to AIDS that finally took him in the early nineties after he had moved away. As long as I live, I’ll never forget how that 30 yo man in the casket could look like a 110yo that had been dead for 10 years.

What’s scary, is that he was a surgical nurse during the late 80s


28 posted on 03/11/2016 3:05:03 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

In 1983, the CDC first warned blood banks of a possible problem with the blood supply. The virus was spreading and patient #1 was not identified until a year later.

In 1984, US scientists discover the virus that causes AIDS; however, this is about a year after the French discovery. President Reagan introduces the topic shortly after.

I was aware in 1982 that there was something going around the gay community, but it was largely rumor and just not reliable. I was working with at-risk kids and in athletics, so we were cautious about anything that may have been transmitted through fluids. Numbers were (and still are) very hard to pin down, but the French started to look harder at it in 1983.

Given the reluctance to report it and the inability to track down solid information, RR acted responsibly. The gay crowd hated on him because he was not talking about it in public. He did not want to start a panic and possibly even more civil problems than they already saw heading for them. He openly addressed it in 1985, when he felt we were better prepared for it. It had NOTHING to do with gays. It was a health issue that had enormous and terrifying consequences attached.

This is typical liberal right-bashing. What better time to drag it out than on this day? They have no shame.


29 posted on 03/11/2016 3:05:09 PM PST by jessduntno ("Where the Hell do you put the bayonet?" - Gen. "Chesty" Puller, at a flamethrower demonstration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

We don’t need 4-8 more years of a president WITHOUT A CONSCIENCE. Burn in hell, Hillary.


30 posted on 03/11/2016 3:05:17 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Really? I don’t see that quote about them being strong supporters of research. Where is it?


31 posted on 03/11/2016 3:07:21 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Obama = ISIS Fanboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

it sickened me to see Hillary Clinton there


32 posted on 03/11/2016 3:07:40 PM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NohSpinZone
I hate that episode. Were it me, I'd have punched out...and probably worse...those two pukes.

Gay or not, it wouldn't have made a difference.

"Are joo talkin-a-to ME!?"
Nose to nose in an instant. "Yep 'Slick'. I'm a talkin to joo. What joo gonna do now? P!$$ in your panties?"

33 posted on 03/11/2016 3:13:20 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (#BlackoLivesMatter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The article criticizes the Reagan’s for doing nothing about AIDS until their second term (i.e., mid-’80s) and then somehow lauds Elizabeth Taylor (Rock Hudson’s friend) for holding an AIDS benefit in 1992.

How many gay people (and blood transfusion recipients) died because AIDS wasn’t treated like any other sexually transmitted disease, with an effort to track down known sexual contacts?


34 posted on 03/11/2016 3:15:04 PM PST by AZLiberty (A is no longer A, but a pull-down menu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
Really? I don’t see that quote about them being strong supporters of research. Where is it?

I didn't see it but apparently Clinton said Nancy Reagan had been a strong advocate on stem cell research, which she was, and on HIV/AIDS research, which she wasn't. She wound up walking back the HIV/AIDS part.

35 posted on 03/11/2016 3:16:30 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
WEll one thing is for sure the entire Clinton crime family simply exudes clASS!
36 posted on 03/11/2016 3:16:59 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
I think it was early in 1981 when the first newspaper stories appeared about this peculiar disease afflicting homosexuals. At one point they were calling those most affected homosexuals, hemophiliacs, and Haitians (in the US). Maybe they also recognized people injecting illegal drugs as an affected group that early. That was before there was a way to screen blood which caused the deaths among hemophiliacs receiving blood donations.

The worry was that infected "bisexuals" would infect heterosexual women who would then infect heterosexual men...of course monogamous individuals had little to worry about (as long as they did not have a promiscuous spouse).

Ronald Reagan speaking out wouldn't have changed a thing. Homosexuals were infecting other homosexuals--they resisted closing down bath houses which were likely sites for spreading the infection.

37 posted on 03/11/2016 3:30:00 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Yeah, not a fan either. I think they were in at least two episodes - AIDS Walk and the Armoire Heist.


38 posted on 03/11/2016 3:45:43 PM PST by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

You DO KNOW that HRC was in bed passed out drunk and that was Huma playing damage control.


39 posted on 03/11/2016 4:34:24 PM PST by onona (Honey this isn't Kindergarten. We are in an all out war for the survival of our Country !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

I remember taking a layman’s pharmacology course in the late 70s in college. There was a day where we covered birth control methods. Efficacy rates were compared between condoms, IUDs, “the pill”, etc and the instructors pointed out what a poor success rate condoms had (about 85%). Fast forward a decade later and, suddenly, condoms were the magic bullet that instantly kept away all diseases, not to mention pregnancies, and we needed to literally throw them at our students to make sure they had one in case the mood hit.

That’s when I knew politics had taken over science.


40 posted on 03/11/2016 4:39:46 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Obama - the AIDS virus for the American body politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson