Posted on 04/08/2016 5:08:31 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
“In 2 weeks the North American Law Center will release proof that Ted Cruz is a fraud. They have issued his campaign a warning that if Cruz doesn’t tell the truth and step down they will release their proof – the truth that so many refused to believe or listen to.” – Karen Bracken
The North American Law Center issued this stark notice to the Cruz campaign on their latest podcast on April 3 (19:00 mark) –
“We’re talking about American citizens (who) think a guy who’s Canadian-born is eligible to be a U.S. president – without any documentation whatsoever. If Ted continues on – we are going to release the files we have, two weeks from tonight, and we will bury Ted Cruz forever in American politics… If we have to stop this guy from defrauding this nation, then we are going to do that.” – J.B. Williams, N.A.L.C.
(Excerpt) Read more at endingthefed.com ...
There you go again! The Act of 1790 was REPEALED, VOIDED by the Act of 1795 which realized the mistake and took out the NBC portion and was never raised again. Children born overseas to U.S. citizens do acquire U.S. citizenship but not NBC! Why? Because they receive naturalization upon showing certain documents to the American Consul abroad and are issued a CRBA. Naturalized children cannot be considered natural born.
My own children cannot run for President because they were born in London and as part of the process the Consul advised me of their ineligibility. Everyone knew this 50 years ago. The dumbing down of America has taken its effect - even on people who should know better.
The American military hospital in which McCain was born was located in Panama City, NOT in the Canal Zone. So, technically, he was born in Panama. There are possible arguments in his favor, but the issue is not really clear.
Yes he truly is the man of mysterious creative documentation. And all fabricated by amateurs. But he did say ‘native-born’ on his web page.
The Act of 1790 was repealed and replaced by the Act of 1795 which omitted the NBC sentence and it never ever reappeared in subsequent changes. Just like slavery disappeared so did NBC. It is common knowledge and settled law that children of U.S. citizens born on foreign soil are naturalized at birth - therefore not NBC. Just read the Supreme Court ruling in Rogers v. Bellei 401 U.S. 815 (1971).
It was from being in between <pre> and </pre> tags, FWIW.
Tax man keeps mentioning the Naturalization Act of 1790 but fails to point out that it was REPEALED and replaced by the Act of 1795 which never ever mentioned NBC again even to this day. There are subsequent supreme court rulings and State Department info guides that positively state that children born to U.S. citizens overseas MUST be naturalized. See the Supreme Court ruling in Rogers v. Bellei 401 U.S. 815 (1971).
Here we go again. If either of your parents is an American citizen then you are one too no matter where you were born.
Bull crap! Then why was I told that my children born in England are not natural born citizens because they required naturalization. I was stationed there while in the U.S. Navy and was required to file for a CRBA - a naturalization process. For s**t’s and giggles try reading the Supreme Court ruling in Rogers v. Bellei 401 U.S. 815 (1971).
Ditto. It’s no as complex as soteroe’s, but the similarities are striking.
Will you FRmail me what you have for comparison, plz.
I was going to comment on that, but he seems impervious to facts.
See the Supreme Court ruling in Rogers v. Bellei 401 U.S. 815 (1971).
See the definition of NBC in Minor vs Happersett. (1874)
More Alinksy tactics being lapped up by Trumpanzees.
Well, that's because his whole existence is fabricated. The public has no idea who he really is.
I did a long time ago but Bellei is an easier read and a lot quicker to get to the point we are trying to make here. Thanks.
Dallas News (August 19, 2013)
WASHINGTON — Born in Canada to an American mother, Ted Cruz became an instant U.S. citizen. But under Canadian law, he also became a citizen of that country the moment he was born.
Unless the Texas Republican senator formally renounces that citizenship, he will remain a citizen of both countries, legal experts say.
That means he could assert the right to vote in Canada or even run for Parliament. On a lunch break from the U.S. Senate, he could head to the nearby embassy — the one flying a bright red maple leaf flag — pull out his Calgary, Alberta, birth certificate and obtain a passport.
“He’s a Canadian,” said Toronto lawyer Stephen Green, past chairman of the Canadian Bar Association’s Citizenship and Immigration Section.......
If children born abroad to US citizens were also understood to be natural born citizens of the United States when the Constitution was written and adopted, then the 1790 Act would translate as: Natural born citizens of the United States shall be considered natural born citizens of the United States.
Comment at puzo1.blogspot.com
All that is needed is for a court, any court to rule that way. But thus far the courts have ruled that Ted Cruz is a natural born citizen of the United States of America.
For example:
““Having extensively reviewed all articles cited in this opinion, as well as many others, this Court holds, consistent with the common law precedent and statutory history, that a ‘natural born citizen’ includes any person who is a United States citizen from birth,” wrote Judge Dan Pellegrini in a written opinion issued after denied the petition at a hearing Thursday.”
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court then affirmed Judge Pellegrini’s ruling.
You’re saying that the definition of NBC has been messed with that long? Or am I not understanding you? Because if that’s what you mean, I do not agree.
Maybe some small faction wanted to change it for a long time, but the definition has been standard, taught in schools and on State Dept information until fairly recently, people remember this.
I like this quote right here:
At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
- Morrison Waite 1875
Did John McCain qualify as a natural born citizen even though born outside of the United States in the Panama Canal Zone?
Please read federal law 8 USC 1401:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401
Ted Cruz qualifies under Section G and there are already specific judicial rulings to that effect.
Rogers v Bellei only pertained to someone wh didn’t have residence in the United States under a law that was repealed in 1978.
Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
I'd like to point out two things. First, the "have been doubts" is a reference to citizenship at all, meaning that there are doubts that all (non-diplomatic) persons born on the soil are even citizens. Second, the framers of the constitution would not have used a term that they thought admitted doubts. Obviously, they could not have predicted that the constitution would include a right to abortion or homosexual marriage, and other subversions that have become common, but there is no way they would have deliberately selected a term of art that was obscure or ambiguous.
Heck, they knew that they, citizens themselves, were naturalized by the creation of the country - and they didn't go through a "naturalization procedure" either!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.