Trump: You Bet I Support Raising Taxes on the Rich

Townhall ^ | 04/21/2016 | Guy Benson

[HiTech RedNeck]

You are the guys who are supposed to know better, that the President is a constitutional role. So the four fingers point right back at you.

For you to play gotcha games with his opinions about state law that he wouldn’t even have any interaction with (it’s not like sanctuary cities) is, well, even less then infantile if there was such a thing.

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

Hoodat: That's exactly what I've been saying

It isn't what you've been saying, hence I call you a liar.

[jwalsh07]

Mr. Trump us talking about removing even more people from the federal tax rolls. How many more folks do we need with no skin in the game?

[dp0622]

that’s what it is man. It’s sad. Don’t pass it on.

We’re one country.

[Sam Gamgee]

Since most of the rich as silicon valley liberals I have no problem with that.

[plewis1250]

Great guy!

#Winning!!!

Trump is a joke.

[KansasGirl]

Here it is.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wDu2fWId8CA

Here it is. Cruz would make such an excellent President.

[plewis1250]

Here here!!!

[jwalsh07]

You get your information from DU or InfoWars?

[AndyJackson]

Without deregulation I don't see how you make a dent in American productivity, however you fiddle the tax rates. Moreover, however you jigger the rates, and however much you lie about it, the revenue has to be reaised, and it will be raised from those who have money except for those who can buy their way out of the tax or pass it on to someone else.

Cutting the tax rate on the rich to 10% is easy, but we all have to figure that at the end of the day the tax burden will be born by the middle class because they are the only other party who can bear the tax burden.

But that is far too simple for Princeton / Harvard genius Cruz to accept.

[HiTech RedNeck]

So why pillory him for not wanting to add more to this self admitted plethora?

Molestation is already banned everywhere, as is propositioning and camera voyeurism etc.

What would you possibly add here, possibly? This is 99 44/100% pure virtue signaling.

[G Larry]

Ya...you send your girls into the restroom with perverts.

But, you’re right. Existing laws prohibit perverts from endangering women.

ENFORCE THE LAW.

[fooman]

I am game. Great idea.

[Agnes Heep]

In three months copulaTED will be a distant memory.

The time for crowing is about four years after the election.

[Nervous Tick]

ROFL!

“Through the looking glass” stuff. Surreal.

[diamond6]

“It’s a “don’t pretend you are soaking the rich when you are giving it right back with the other hand” scheme.”

Exactly.

[LostInBayport]

It has been a remarkable year, hasn’t it? Up is down, wrong is right...not just here on FR but in every other news story. We live in Bizarro World!

[HiTech RedNeck]

It sounds almost like shoulder chipping back at the tranny crowd, ensuring that this issue is going to continue to remain in the kindergarten.

Why was something new needed on the books here? Haven’t we already regulated decency out the wazoo, even with laws that haven’t been enforced for 100 years?

I thought a conservative value was to have few, meaningful laws rather than a plethora of regulations for the sake of virtue signaling.

[AndyJackson]

Federal corporate taxes are taxes on profits after labor and material costs, depreciation, interest on debt, etc.

Many corporations pay no federal tax at all as a consequence.

[thoughtomator]

Your deflection confirms that I am correct.

You love big government when it does what you want it to do. And you want other people to pay for it.