Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I guess I understand her point. But the battle has to be fought. I wish she would take some leadership on this point.
1 posted on 05/20/2016 4:37:10 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper

Someone wants to be VP, and will do anything to get it.
She got her orders, now we’ll see if she gets anything for it.


2 posted on 05/20/2016 4:39:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

The lefty way is to probe, probe, probe... this could be a valuable page to take out of their book.

She might just not want to fight all the lefty opprobrium at this point.

GENERALLY, pro-life has wanted to be easy on the mothers as was historically the case before Roe v. Wade. However this is about the docs, so that worry isn’t even germane here.


3 posted on 05/20/2016 4:43:05 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Gov. Fallin joins the morally depraved side of other genocidal murderers committing crimes against humanity and giving aid and comfort to the enemy.


4 posted on 05/20/2016 4:45:04 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Abortions are not “performed,” they are “committed.”


11 posted on 05/20/2016 4:53:11 PM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
"In fact, the most direct path to a re-examination of the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade is the appointment of a conservative, pro-life justice to the United States Supreme Court."

Is that really 'the most direct path'? The SCOTUS doesn't just revisit on its own volition precedents like Roe. There has to be a case in controversy that directly challenges Roe. And laying the groundwork for such a case is the responsibility of folks like Gov. Fallin.

I get the argument that a 5-3 majority of the current Court is going to be unfavorably disposed toward a full-on attack on Roe. And, yet, SCOTUS appointments aren't something that Gov. Fallin can directly affect. She ain't running for President. She ain't on the Senate Judiciary Committee. On the other hand, this law restricting abortion in Oklahoma is something that she can directly affect and something that could be the basis for a Roe challenge down the line. You've got to start somewhere. It seems to me that she dropped the ball here.
13 posted on 05/20/2016 4:55:21 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

From what state is Gov. Fallin?


14 posted on 05/20/2016 4:56:16 PM PDT by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

From what state is Gov. Fallin?


15 posted on 05/20/2016 4:56:52 PM PDT by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

...I guess I understand her point...

A Bill like this has to have specific definitions and very specific criteria for enforcement. If it leaves alot to interpretation, it can be easily shot down on appeal as void for vagueness.
The OK legislature apparently wasn’t specific enough in its language. If they really want the law, they should try again. I think, he Governor would sign it if it were specific enough with its language.


16 posted on 05/20/2016 5:11:06 PM PDT by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prison 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

So, rewrite the bill and pass it again.


17 posted on 05/20/2016 5:11:29 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I opposed the bill, but not for the same reasons as the governor.

It contained exceptions you could drive abortion on demand through.

Not just life of the mother, but the “mental health” of the mother. In other words, all the hit man would have to do is have the murderous mother sign a form that says that she might do herself harm, maybe, if she wasn’t allowed to have her precious child exterminated.

Fallin’s judicial supremacist views are fatal to any sort of attempt to stop abortion anyhow, by the way. They are a coup d’etat against republican constitutional self-government.


18 posted on 05/20/2016 5:16:01 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Another GOP FAILURE... Flush them All, They Stand for Nothing!

The Enemy is within and until we deal with that Enemy we will Never be able to Deal with the Enemy’s outside the Nation.


20 posted on 05/20/2016 5:30:40 PM PDT by jafojeffsurf (Return to the Constitution, A Moral People, and Return to On Nation UNDER God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

In states where abortion is not popular (Utah and Louisiana come to mind), tax it into rarity.

It works with everything else.


22 posted on 05/20/2016 6:26:16 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson