Posted on 05/25/2016 2:28:31 PM PDT by Kaslin
Democrats on Capitol Hill have discussed the possiblity of removing Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz from her position prior to the party's national convention this summer in Philadelphia.
According to The Hill, some Democrats believe that Wasserman Schultz's ongoing battles with Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders have made her too divisive a figure to unite the party ahead of this fall's election campaign.
"There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on," one Democratic senator who supports frontrunner Hillary Clinton told The Hill.
"I don’t see how she can continue to the election," the lawmaker added. "How can she open the convention? Sanders supporters would go nuts."
"There’s a strong sentiment that the current situation is untenable and can only be fixed by her leaving," a senior Senate Democratic aide said. "There’s too much water under the bridge for her to be a neutral arbiter."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Drop her like a rancid burrito.
I’m sure DNC will bow to the radical rioters. It’s the DNC way to immediately surrender in the face of contention.
Is that what the CPUSA is calling itself these days?
We really need to call a spade a spade.
These are degenerate marxists and sex perverts.
Communists have NO PLACE in the Federal Government of the United States.
This mockie Sanders and his followers are REDS.
The Democrats are REDS.
Time to make it a crime to be a communist in America again.
For so long the Liberal Media and Fox News kept talking about how the Republican convention would be a mad house. Now Trump is unquestionably going to be the Republican nominee and the Democrats are heading to having a civil war at their convention.
“It’s hard to imagine a liberal who is all three and can still profess liberalism without resorting to superiority and snark.”
That person was actually Howard Dean. Forget about the “Dean Scream” for a minute. That was just media garbage to hand the Dem nomination to Lurch.
Howard Dean oversaw the Dem’s strategy to win the 2006 and 2008 elections. He was the person that went all out to get the so called Blue Dog Democrats elected. That “50 state” strategy was adopted by Axlerod. I’m pretty sure he was behind the entire movement to get Barky elected vs. the Seawitch.
We all know Dean as a screamer and unhinged ... when he’s on TV being interviewed, he is quite composed and is very adept at delivering a message (not one I agree with, but one none the less). All things being equal, had he run against Bush in 2004, he had a great shot at winning ... certainly better than Kerry.
Why the Dems let him walk away from that position is beyond me. He’s quite tactical. He’s the polar opposite of mayonnaise head.
Mayoskull had to be one of Clinton’s demands of Obama when she decided to concede the Dem nomination to him in 2008. She’s been nothing but a loudmouth mess since the day she took over.
I hope to God the Dems don’t fire her! She’s a walking disaster!
“Top tier loyal Democrats.”
No. They’re top tier loyal Clintonistas ... big difference. They have no commitments to any one leftist ideology ... they just want money.
For example, if one were to get oil companies to donate vast fortunes to Clintonistas, you’d see current AGW theory vanish in a nanosecond. They don’t care if its true or not ... all they care about is the power and dollars they come with promoting such nonsense. If a company like Exxon were to pay them enough, they’d shut up about it and move on to some other new, manufactured crisis (I’m sure they have a whole list of them).
I love seeing these people start to get what they deserve. Hopefully they’ll soon see their dear leaders FINALLY be brought to justice.
The article is written to imply that the move to oust Wasserman is somehow pro-Clinton. LOL on that one. Pro-Hillary politicians do not want someone “neutral” running the show. This is all about getting rid of Hillary’s pit bull so they can create a Biden/Warren unity ticket, because they know Hillary is about to go under. They need a Chairperson capable of buying off Sanders with something like adding Che Guevara to Mt. Rushmore or Anschluss with Venezuela. Preferably a transsexual of color.
This ain’t your 50’s and early 60’s politics. Those types of people can’t get nominated none-the-less win office. Waiting for those types to come around is like waiting for hell to freeze over.
So really it’s about accepting slow incremental change or keep gambling on the lottery.
“considered dropping DNC chairman Wasserman Schultz”
Hopefully along with ever other Demorat, preferably off the Chrysler Buding.
*building
Little Debbie was “dropped” on her head when she was born so the Dem. Party is just continuing on with her policy of receiving brain damage.
Yep and it was Dean who is the Godfather of Internet politics and use of social media. Also every now and then Dean will say something coherent.
OH NOOOOOOO!
She needs to be dropped into a volcano. Its the only way to be sure.
“Are democrats sexist against women chairmen??”
Only the ones with wormy hair. :^)
-—Isn’t it a war on women, to remove a woman from a high position?? Are democrats sexist against women chairmen??
.
.
.
INDEED! (I had to chuckle, but I like where your going with this...)
Debbie Wasserman. Proof that the creature from the black lagoon had an affair with Man Bear Pig in 1965.
DWS is essentially a nobody whom the Dems are quite happy to anoint as a sacrificial goat to throw at the Sanders wolves, hoping to appease them for a bit.
Seems like there are a lot more crazy women in the Democrat party than there used to be.
No, keep her! she’s fun to watch, like the 3 stooges movies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.