When trying to justify the benefit of illegal aliens’ presence here WaPo lumps them into the overall ‘immigrant’ category.
They and other bleeding heart, spend-your-money liberals can’t justify the benefit of illegals one damn bit.
I would rather these illegals were left at the border
“The Supreme Court leaves undocumented immigrants in the shadows”
Funny, I always assumed it was because they illegally came into the nation without permission, and refuse to go home and do it the right way.
They are not undocumented immigrants. They are criminal invaders.
Shadows? It should leave them rotting in Prison!
Pull them out of the shadows and send them back.
How is immigration good for social health? Jihad, unemployment and massive welfare expenses are not positive social influences, unless you are a globalist and want América enslaved.
Honestly, the delusion of the media is just too weird to be sincere. There were interviews on the evening news last night with affected invaders. They were middle aged, shown with their teenage children, and you know what? They could hardly communicate their thoughts in English, after all those years of being here.
As a resident of a border state, who sees illegals tramping past my house on a regular basis, the protests interest me.
I would think if they put half the effort into applying for legal status as they do protesting, they would be given green cards. Especially with the current regime.
But wait, then they would no be able to claim their Oppressed Status.
In the shadows?? America is being invaded by foreign hoards.
They’re in our schools, hospitals, McDonald’s, hospitality, universities, construction, transportation, prisons, and in some cases our voting booths.
You have legal immigration and you have illegal immigration. All the other “buzz” words are B.S.
Bring them out into the light ... so they can be comfortably deported ...
They probably have more rights and protection under this commie regime, than we do.
The Washington Post is getting no love in the comments section. There seems to be one poster trying to support the Posts viewpoint, everybody else is hammering it like a bent nail.
They came here illegally and swear no allegiance to our country. It’s sickening the excuses for this illegal activity. The immigrants through Ellis Island had to be determined if they would be allowed entry and this forced entry and sense of entitlement from these invaders is why our country is in downfall. They cannot justify this so shout racism! There is no right to break our laws when those who come here legally did it for what? Mexico is also hypocritical on this issue as they have very strict immigration laws.
Maybe they should bask in the sunshine of their home countries, rather than hiding in this shadowy land.
Hardly. The "social health" of the country is immeasurably injured by the tolerance, perhaps even promotion, of lawbreaking - not just in the illegal presence, but also in the personally devastating identity theft industry. WAPO is full of excrement.
In summarizing the Gang of Eight bill, the Post continues in the tradition of deception. They pretend like the future enforcement measures and punitive actions will be carried out, and of course, they completely leave out how the bill would have massively increased (already too-high) levels of legal immigration.
It would have at least doubled legal immigration. Yet none of the Gang members, or supporters like Obama and the media ever spoke about that aspect of the bill? What is that? Could it be that they know that polls consistently show that a majority of Americans oppose increasing legal immigration, and that often a majority or plurality favor reducing it?