Posted on 09/28/2016 7:23:53 AM PDT by hawaiian
I live here in the burbs. I go to lunch about once a month with a group of old friends.
The talk has very much turned to what is happening demographically and that their neighborhoods are starting to scare them. True.
(Granted, I don't hang around with liberals or dummies for the most part)
Says to me...."I've got the votes already thanks to Obama and voter fraud."
Wasn't it? The signal-gestures weren't even subtle. The responses *too* quick and too concise. TOO SCRIPTED.
So what we witnessed was another contrived play involving the usual Dem Media mod (Lester Holt) tipping the scale in favor of yet one more Democrat.
Last time The Hag wore an ear-piece for presumed instruction and coaching. Hillary Clinton is just not able to do or say anything without cheating, lying, or engaging in subterfuge.
Woah! I read through the whole Breitbart report and at the end I found that the poll demographics showed 53% women and 47% men. That’s a 3% skew from the real vote, and that helps Hillary. Add about 2% to Trump from these results.
That communist witch lied so many times in the debate trying to copy Trump's positions he figured out like reducing regulations on businesses small and large. It's just another lie from commie Hillary . As Trump said Hillary has had 30 years and has never reduced regulations on businesses nor reduce taxes nor nothing . what she really wants is communism with her in Chavez's role as dictator. she's lying lying what an evil communist .
Glad Trump destroyed this evil monster and Her NAFTA approving Husband Clinton
One word of caution on this poll.
It may be as accurate as they come but it is a Breitbart News Network supported poll so if there is any bias it could be showing Trump doing better than he actually is.
Anyone who has been following this poll and can vouch for its accuracy should speak up. I know very little about it
__________________________________________
This is Pat Caddell’s poll. It should be Kosher.
How reliable is this poll?
It’s from Breitbart/Gravis!!!
I construe it that way as well. Except we may well discount this woman and her Joker-like smirk as disengaged from reality and delusional. However, that arrogant smirk *is* sorta reminiscent of 0bama's *own* arrogant "It's-in-the-bag" smirk, isn't it?
Voter Fraud is the *only* thing that can stop Trump. DHS has already set the table and declared that it might have to step in to help ensure a "legit" count. Very conveniently.
If The Witch and this corrupt regime pull off massive fraud once again, Houston, we'll have more than a YUGE problem.
A revolt is unfolding before our eyes.
No Nate sucks(Quantitatively true), he missed Brexit and he was kind of arrogant about it before that he had it right and it would fail. He's a smug, idiot fake savant, I've seen him interviewed. He admits he whiffed on Trump and he continues to whiff. He's like a psychic medium who guessed one thing right but now can't predict what direction the sun will set. In addition to make this a hatefest on Nate more believable, he was outed as getting internal polls from the Obama camp in 2012. Not unethical but not honest as he woofed about he was using just public polls to get his predictions.
“It was Hillarys reaction shots during the debate. Her expression was condescending, she made faces and rolled her eyes. I couldnt stand to watch her.”
Smug,smirky, condescending, and that phony smile that looked like the rictus smile of a succubus. I saw all of that by watching very closely; I wondered how many of the rest of the 80 million watching saw any of that as well.
**48% say they’re going to vote for Trump, 43% for Hillary**
TTTT!
Yes, the effect was...effective. Only she's more psychotic :-)
The optics and visuals from that debate were terrible for Hillary.
Agree. I don't think that notion has quite set it for her minions of co-delusional lunatics. Demonic Libs/progs can't normally discern between the smile of a compassionate human being and a reptilian sneer.
Let’s have a moment for rational thought.
1) She didn’t have the answers in advance. Secrets with that many involved don’t remain secret. Someone would talk. No one has because it didn’t happen.
2) She didn’t have a secret radio to feed her answers. It didn’t happen. She had a microphone, like Trump.
3) The winner of the debate is the candidate who collects votes from it. As of now, polls suggest that’s Trump. It’s not who makes telling points, or rebuts best in academic debate style. It’s who collects votes. It’s not really a “debate”, and never has been.
4) Trump didn’t hit her on this or didn’t hit her on that and why didn’t he talk about this or that . . . he’s not there to make his supporters feel good. He’s there to collect new votes. There is no value in risking a bully appearance by being an attack dog When He’s Ahead. When you’re ahead . . . it’s not like football. You CAN play prevent defense. The clock will run out. He will win if he doesn’t make mistakes.
5) He’s not a politician. He’s not a debater. He’s winning BECAUSE he’s not a politician and not a debater. 67% of the US population does not have a bachelors degree. That is the richer territory to mine for votes than the degreed.
Dumbocrats can ONLY win w/ voter fraud...they’re too stupid to win honestly.
All you’re ever going to get from Queen Hillary is smug and condescending...
Reuters poll just out. Hillary by 4, in a four way, up by 6 head to head.
Statespoll.com with proper D/R adjustment: Trump +2.
If the ‘debate’ worked FOR Hillary we’d already be seeing the results on MSNBC and CNN.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.