Posted on 10/24/2016 9:40:34 AM PDT by conservativepoet
Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations. “In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I’m not sure who you’re talking to. You need to make that a little clearer before you go off on folks.
I’ve not criticized O’Keefe.
I’m not sure who you’re talking to. You need to make that a little clearer before you go off on folks.
I’ve not criticized O’Keefe.
___________________________________________________
I guess I thought it would be very apparent I’m referring to those who discounted this great work by Mr. O’Keefe. If you weren’t in this group, then I wasn’t referring to you...okay?
Better
Not trying to be a smart a$$, but if you’d like my comment removed, I’d completely understand.
It just pi$$es me off that SOME only have criticism and cynicism to offer in response to what this brave young man has done. I’m sure I could’ve made my point without dropping the masked F-bomb. Again, maybe the mods can delete my post.
Sorry for not being more clear.
It’s OK. Trump in a landslide.
It’s OK. Trump in a landslide.
____________________________
Indeed! ;-)
I think he (O’Keefe) is incredibly brave, his work is fabulous - unbelievably really how good it is and how impactful. It has been almost as impactful as the massive Wikileaks drops...and that was even before today.
But today’s piece doesn’t pack the punch that the prior two did. That’s because the laws broken here are insider election laws that don’t capture the imagination that, say, fomenting violence that bloodies policemen does. The subject matter doesn’t have carry - to use a baseball term. If it bleeds, it gets attention...these crimes are like insider trader crimes - they won’t sway the voters because almost all voters don’t even understand them, they’re technical fouls. It isn’t a criticism of O’Keefe, he’s a giant in true journalism and a Freedom Fighter, it’s just that this one doesn’t quite live up to the billing.
And Krauthammer just said on O’Reilly that everyone knows there’s pretty much a loose connection between candidates and PACS regardless of laws
Will the people give a ****? I am uncertain
I have next to no faith in my fellow man.
Thanks it is getting harder to keep track of Illiarily schemes and her thugs’s schemes to win this election.
Agree.
Takes a fair amount of guts and an amount of stress to go in and using pretexts on unsuspecting people. Going in with hidden cameras, microphones, a script etc. There is always a chance the actor or camera lens gets made, the actor gets ID'd, recognized, equipment fails, the actor fails to ask the right questions, the subjects get suspicious and on and on. Then the legal ramifications always come into question after the event from the targets attorneys.
Not as simple as some think. O'keefe has done some great historic stuff in this election and other events. From my perspective, those who attempt to discredit and undermine O'keefe and his efforts, are suspect at best. And I base this on the fact after making some observations, there seems to be a pattern of the same individuals who have been making these defeatist comments throughout the election. (No surprise btw).
With the defeatist, it's generally comments like, "I support Trump 100%, so don't get me wrong, but he's stupid and will lose".☺☺
We need to infiltrate a Hillary function with some Duck Dynasty Duck Calls-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TDAwWxRCL0
That would really be a hoot- I mean a quack!
The term "fly" and "fly girls" is many hundreds of years old.How that word/term managed to get into hip-hop and the ghetto, I have no idea, but somehow it did.
CNN is corrupt...
The media won’t cover it.
Her supporters won’t care.
No one will be investigated.
It’s almost not worth talking about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.