Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations
Fox News Politics ^ | October 30, 2016

Posted on 10/30/2016 10:04:01 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The ABC/Washington Post tracking poll was conducted from Tuesday to Friday, which means the survey’s 1,781 respondents could only be asked on the final day about the revelations regarding the new emails.

Still, the poll found 34 percent of the respondents were “less likely” to vote for Clinton and that she now leads Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump by just a single percentage point, 46-to-45 percent, in a four-way White House race, with Election Day on Nov. 8....

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016polls; clinton; comey; comeyfbiletter; donaldtrump; emails; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillarypoll; poll; polling; trackingpoll; trump; trumppoll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 10/30/2016 10:04:01 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ruh roh


2 posted on 10/30/2016 10:06:12 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m not “less likely” to vote for Clinton...I was at a 0.000% chance before the revelation....


3 posted on 10/30/2016 10:08:24 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

jsut covering their butt from their ridiculously biased polls...now they have an excuse for being so far off


4 posted on 10/30/2016 10:08:38 AM PDT by rolling_stone (easy if she had)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

James O’Keefe of Project Veritas has promised to release a video early this week showing “them” demeaning and disparaging black people. Its going to be an interesting week, that’s for sure.


5 posted on 10/30/2016 10:10:12 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

BOOM!

Its over - its actually already over because D +7, D +8 is nowhere in sight in early voting.

Remember, that’s why pollsters assume Hillary has a slight lead or the race is tied.

In reality, she’s well behind, especially if electorate is R +4.


6 posted on 10/30/2016 10:10:20 AM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Uh-Oh Spaghetti-Os!


7 posted on 10/30/2016 10:10:22 AM PDT by Preston Manning (When standing on the edge of a cliff, a "giant step forward" is NOT progress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Maybe they should just stay home in protest. They should make their voices heard with their refusal to support corruption. Or write-in Bernie. Or whatever.


8 posted on 10/30/2016 10:11:33 AM PDT by Mjreagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

IBD keeps getting (approx.) R+2 samples and ‘rebalancing’ (isn’t that unskewing?) to a D+7 to D+9 electorate.


9 posted on 10/30/2016 10:13:15 AM PDT by Mjreagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I actually don’t believe this. I believe the 34% were people already voting for Trump.

The devil is in the details. Hillary supporters or waffling independents are not going to dump Hillary because of some vague lapse of email protocol. The actual emails themselves have to be damning for this to be damaging to her.


10 posted on 10/30/2016 10:13:46 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (Ted Kennedy burns in hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Put_a_fork_and_an_orange_pantsuit_on_her_she_is_done!


11 posted on 10/30/2016 10:14:07 AM PDT by cgbg (Another World War I veteran for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
jsut covering their butt from their ridiculously biased polls...now they have an excuse for being so far off

I agree. Though I'm sure the FBI announcement will help Trump, it will also give the biased pollsters an easy "out" when Trump wins and again they won't have to face any consequences for their open bias and attempt to influence the election. I can see it now, "Our polls were absolutely correct, Hillary really WAS ahead by 12 points two weeks before the election, but the FBI announcement threw the election into chaos and once the dust settled the voters moved to Trump..."

12 posted on 10/30/2016 10:16:10 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

The news to the waffling independents is that top secret and classified emails are in the possession of a known sex offender.

That’s it.

Most of these voters didn’t know who Huma and the Weiner were.

They know now.

She is done.

All the rest is boring details argued about by talking heads and politics geeks.


13 posted on 10/30/2016 10:16:35 AM PDT by cgbg (Another World War I veteran for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So, how exactly can you be ahead a few points, lose 30% in a 3 day average, which should be 10%, and only lose 2% in the final tally?


14 posted on 10/30/2016 10:16:54 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
"Most of these voters didn’t know who Huma and the Weiner were.
They know now."

You make a good point.

15 posted on 10/30/2016 10:17:59 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (Ted Kennedy burns in hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mjreagan

Yup. That’s exactly what they’re doing.

Electorate looks white, male, older, Republican and predominantly conservative.

Wait - that was 2014. A presidential year electorate is supposed to look multi-racial, female, younger, Democratic and predominantly liberal.

Oops - so maybe 2016 is the new 2014.


16 posted on 10/30/2016 10:18:10 AM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Bueno.


17 posted on 10/30/2016 10:20:44 AM PDT by Mjreagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: apillar

I don’t think the FBI announcement will change anyone’s mind that was already planning to vote for Hillary, (lets face it, if you were still going to vote for Clinton after the other hundred scandals over the last 25 years, one more won’t make a difference.) Where I think it will help is the “pox on both your houses” people or the “#nevertrumpers” that were planning to sit out the election. It might be enough to give them the kick in the butt they need to go to polls.


18 posted on 10/30/2016 10:22:13 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

I think there is something to it. For those voters who pay attention, it’s not necessarily any one event so much as the steady drip drip drip of news about Hillary’s staggering amount of corruption that has a corrosive effect.


19 posted on 10/30/2016 10:22:56 AM PDT by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson