Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another bullet dodged. Valerie Bailey-Rihn won her judgeship in an election this April so while her profile was very much that of a Madison liberal, she did her job faithfully according to state law which describes specific criteria that Jill Stein could come nowhere close to meeting.

Maybe it takes time on the bench for the pressure of party politics to turn a judge into an activist, but in this important case, we dodged another bullet.

Some counties may opt to count by hand, as Dane County where Madison is located has, but that has always been a choice that is up to the county clerk. The outcome will be the same regardless.

1 posted on 11/30/2016 9:20:52 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bigbob
Some counties may opt to count by hand, as Dane County where Madison is located has, but that has always been a choice that is up to the county clerk. The outcome will be the same regardless.

This is where watchers will be required. If they're going to go for the massive fraud move, it is in these counties being hand counted that it will happen.
2 posted on 11/30/2016 9:23:19 AM PST by JamesP81 (The DNC poses a greater threat to my liberty than terrorists, China, and Russia. Combined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
"I follow the law. That's who I am despite my personal opinions," said Bailey-Rihn

She just won her next election.................

3 posted on 11/30/2016 9:24:00 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Hopefully Governor Walker can stick that $3.5M right into upcoming GOP campaigns in the state. A big hat tip to George Soros for keeping republicans in charge of a dark blue state.


4 posted on 11/30/2016 9:24:13 AM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Follow the law? What the hell kind of judge is that? I thought judges decreed laws.


5 posted on 11/30/2016 9:26:12 AM PST by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Can I just make an observation, that a hand recount may not actually be more accurate?

Human error and fatigue enter into the equation, if they are going to have people laboriously reviewing computer punch cards, or optical scan sheets, or other ballots intended to be tallied by machines.

Then you get into the judgment calls where perhaps a voter left the pres choice blank. Liberals will look at such ballots and say there’s a scratch by the Democrat name, and decide the voter intended to vote Democrat, and add it to the vote total, even though the voter may have intentionally not voted for president.

Every recount I’ve ever known of, has come out with slightly different results each time they count. There is never going to be a perfect total of votes.


8 posted on 11/30/2016 9:27:40 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

There actually should be a Google, Yahoo, etc. bot out there that translates anything that says “Jill Stein” to the words “Hillary Clinton” because that is what is up with all that.


10 posted on 11/30/2016 9:28:27 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Everything is moving ahead as planned by team Satan. The ballots have been planted or adjusted, the judge expedites the recount so WI can be put in Hillary’s column.

Next...


14 posted on 11/30/2016 9:30:56 AM PST by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America. Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

A judge following the law? What a novel concept!

She must be new to this game.


19 posted on 11/30/2016 9:36:52 AM PST by Deo volente ("Our Independence Day is at hand, and it arrives finally on November 8th." Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

No more liberal cocktail parties for Valerie Bailey-Rihn!


22 posted on 11/30/2016 9:42:29 AM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
IMO the Dems always knew they would lose (not the election, the recount). So why did they do it?

To delegitimize. To polarize. to energize.

Delegitimize - they can't win this election, but they can claim Trump didn't either. There are some sports stats that occurred during strike years, that will forever have an asterisk beside them - not legitimate. Like Bush in 2000 - "selected, not elected"

Polarize - keep the people divided, hateful, distrustful of one another.

Energize - the struggle goes on. As long as there's no resolution to the election fiasco, protests like blocking of highways, "occupy" sit-ins, etc. will continue.

The objective is to deny Trump's ability to govern, and claw back some power in '18. Expect this issue to be #1 in the next election, and probably the one after (2020)

29 posted on 11/30/2016 9:54:21 AM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

How do you hand count a machine? “That’s one machine— That’s two machines?”


33 posted on 11/30/2016 9:59:57 AM PST by WENDLE (Sanctuary cities are OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE!! That is a FELONY!! Ask Nixon!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

she was getting rid of a case that was going to be appealed regardless of her ruling.


41 posted on 11/30/2016 12:49:48 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson