Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michigan GOP files with 6th circuit to stop recount.

Posted on 12/05/2016 12:24:30 PM PST by roostercogburn

Breaking on twitter via Paul Egan. Political reporter, Detroit.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: jillstein; michigan; recount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
Guy is solid reporter. Good news!
1 posted on 12/05/2016 12:24:30 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

Based on the conversation here in the wee hours of the morning, this move seemed inevitable.


2 posted on 12/05/2016 12:25:48 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

So two suits to stop it now, one in the MI court of appeals by the AG, and this? Should be fun.


3 posted on 12/05/2016 12:28:45 PM PST by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

This is a double edged sword. If the 6th decides against Michigan this is the end of the trail. The SCOTUS if there is an appeal might decide but if they tie, the decision the 6th makes will stand with no more appeal.


4 posted on 12/05/2016 12:31:44 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

I’m betting the court stays the opinion from last night almost immediately after receiving the paperwork.
No way a judge can just arbitrarily change election protocols that are established concerning challenge rules.


5 posted on 12/05/2016 12:32:27 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

This suit was filed because no state court can overturn the order by the U.S. District court. It needs to be done by a higher Federal court.


6 posted on 12/05/2016 12:32:56 PM PST by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
So two suits to stop it now, one in the MI court of appeals by the AG, and this? Should be fun.

Darn, I was going to post the same thing.

I'm still surprised to see the Trump legal team staying out of this. But, perhaps they are keeping their hands off to avoid accusations of political interference.

7 posted on 12/05/2016 12:33:40 PM PST by justlurking (#TurnOffCNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

WHY doesn’t someone in the GOP demand a recount in CALIFORNIA?


8 posted on 12/05/2016 12:34:15 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

What is the political balance of the 6th court of appeals? Do we have a decent chance of a fair hearing with them?


9 posted on 12/05/2016 12:34:16 PM PST by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

“The SCOTUS if there is an appeal might”

I’m betting that the SC will not take up this case in any form.


10 posted on 12/05/2016 12:34:17 PM PST by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

Well the count has started regardless... at this point even if 6th circuit denies, no additional harm will come other than the counting.


11 posted on 12/05/2016 12:34:29 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: luv2ski

5 out of 16 judges appointed by either Obama, Clinton or carter. Remaining 11 are GOP appointees.


12 posted on 12/05/2016 12:36:32 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MaxistheBest

Not really, the issue before the federal court yesterday was merely in regard to timing. The state court still has jurisdiction to rule on the recount itself and could thereby moot the decision of the federal court.


13 posted on 12/05/2016 12:36:39 PM PST by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MaxistheBest
This suit was filed because no state court can overturn the order by the U.S. District court.

I believe the US District court order was limited to "start on Monday, instead of waiting two business days until Wednesday".

I think the two day delay was to give the state time to appeal. That appeal was made to the MI court of appeals, and the hearing is tomorrow.

If the MI court says: "no recount", it's over aside from an appeal to the MI Supreme Court.

I don't know what the grounds for the appeal to the 6th Circuit might be, unless there's more to the US District's order.

14 posted on 12/05/2016 12:38:58 PM PST by justlurking (#TurnOffCNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
This is a double edged sword. If the 6th decides against Michigan this is the end of the trail. The SCOTUS if there is an appeal might decide but if they tie, the decision the 6th makes will stand with no more appeal.

I think that is what the left is shooting for now. Lets face it, with the Wisconsin recount half complete and Hillary actually losing votes and Pennsylvania looking to be dead in the water, they know at this point that nothing they do is going to change the election result. So they are shooting for the next best thing, starting so many legal battles that the Republicans will be forced to take it all the way to the Supreme Court, just to insure that Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania get certified before the electoral college meets. Then the left can scream, "Selected not elected!" and "They must be hiding fraud, they shut down the recount!" for the next four years.

15 posted on 12/05/2016 12:39:34 PM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: luv2ski

Heavy GOP


16 posted on 12/05/2016 12:39:53 PM PST by DarthVader ("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

“The state court still has jurisdiction to rule on the recount itself”

“In ordering the recount to begin at noon Monday, rather than Wednesday morning under the two-day waiting period the state planned to observe, Goldsmith ordered the recount, once started,

“must continue until further order of this court.”

Doesn’t sound like the state courts have any say at this point...


17 posted on 12/05/2016 12:41:21 PM PST by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

The precedent is Bush v. Gore.
Trump’s rights under the 14th. Amendment are being
violated by Jill Stein and her recounts.

Of course a ruling that quotes that case is just
the bloody shirt the Left is looking to come away
with here.


18 posted on 12/05/2016 12:43:17 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MaxistheBest

He said that? The state court should tell him to go pound sand.


19 posted on 12/05/2016 12:44:40 PM PST by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MaxistheBest

I think his hubris in saying that on his order is the only way the recount will stop will be his undoing.
I think his bosses at the 6th circuit stop this mess.


20 posted on 12/05/2016 12:46:04 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson