Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is New York Times signaling that SCOTUS nominee Neil Gorsuch is pro-homosexual?
https://www.lifesitenews.com ^ | March 3, 2017 | Peter LaBarbera

Posted on 03/03/2017 5:03:03 PM PST by NKP_Vet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
So many great conservative judges, fine Christians, that Trump could have chosen and for some reason this man is picked to replace Scalia. Makes no sense because Gorsuch sounds like a clone of Anthony Kennedy.
1 posted on 03/03/2017 5:03:03 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Dude, seriously, the New York Times routinely lies.

It’s less than 50/50 that this is accurate, too.

Probably 20/80 with the lie being 80.


2 posted on 03/03/2017 5:05:10 PM PST by Lazamataz (The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

President Trump, Please consult with the Almighty before going through with your nominations. If not, there will be TROUBLE ahead. You can count on it. Just read the Bible.


3 posted on 03/03/2017 5:05:19 PM PST by Maudeen (No one on this earth is too far gone for Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

at least he’s not a snake handler. He’s not a snake handler is he?


4 posted on 03/03/2017 5:05:50 PM PST by brucedickinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
and striking down Texas’s anti-sodomy law.”

Besides, Souter's decision here was the right one. Consenting adults can stick whatever, wherever.

5 posted on 03/03/2017 5:06:40 PM PST by Lazamataz (The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

The Heritage Foundation told Trump this was their #1 pick from the list they gave him!!! I don’t know that I believe ANY of the reporting on Gorsuch Billy Graham, and MANY other pastors are EXTREMELY happy with Gorsuch!!!


6 posted on 03/03/2017 5:09:18 PM PST by Kit cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I have never met a Catholic who converted to the Episcopal cult who was not radically pro-gay and radically pro abortion.


7 posted on 03/03/2017 5:09:55 PM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Can you offer proof OTHER than what the Times says?

Because this sounds like psy-ops in order to turn voters against Trump.

You know, just like everything else the Times writes.


8 posted on 03/03/2017 5:10:34 PM PST by Luircin (Dancing in the streets! Time to DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Junk and fake news as usual from the NY Slimes!


9 posted on 03/03/2017 5:11:54 PM PST by Grampa Dave (We are winning every day, while the Dems and Never Trumpsters are whining every day!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

This is the third post from you about Gorsuch in a few days from the same source...New York Times...


10 posted on 03/03/2017 5:12:33 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Trump team maybe didn’t consider who his pastor was. No vetting process is fullproof. If he can separate his own views from the Constitution and community norms and religious rights to refuse service to those whose morals are sinful and repugnant, that would be good.


11 posted on 03/03/2017 5:12:48 PM PST by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

The string “constitution” occurs only once in this article. Talk about missing the point.


12 posted on 03/03/2017 5:14:20 PM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Ummmm...

I’ve got my plate, my spoon, my knife, and my fork...

I’ve got my favorite liquid refreshment.

I’ve got my napkin in my lap and my elbows aren’t on the table.

Okay now, where’s our own? Let’s eat!

Folks, seriously, who needs the Left to destroy us?


13 posted on 03/03/2017 5:14:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“Besides, Souter’s decision here was the right one. Consenting adults can stick whatever, wherever.”

If that was the decision of the Texas Supreme Court...fine. The Federal gov’t. has no Constitutional authority to overrule states on this issue...unless -of course - you start “seeing” all sorts of “implied” rights in the Amendments. But that is a slippery-slope towards judicial tyranny.


14 posted on 03/03/2017 5:14:46 PM PST by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

You may be right, but that church he attends sounds like they don’t believe much from God’s Word. I’ve been pro-Trump since June 2016, but on side of him that does NOT thrill me is his approving relationship with homos of all different stripes.


15 posted on 03/03/2017 5:15:17 PM PST by Tucker39 (In giving us The Christ, God gave us the ONE thing we desperately NEEDED; a Savior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Based upon the reasoning in the article, if Gorsuch will be a pro homo vote because of the church he went to, then how do we explain Princess Pelosi and Justice Scalia as having different position, yet both belonged to the Catholic Church?

I say beware of the NY Slimes.


16 posted on 03/03/2017 5:17:16 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Wow! You are so easy to roll.

What difference does his personal opinions make. He is a strict constructionist and will base his opinions on what is in the Constitution


17 posted on 03/03/2017 5:18:10 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Dude, seriously, the New York Times routinely lies.

I never trust the anti-American, pro-Communist New York Slimes. Why would I trust it this time? I trust the judgment of President Trump.

18 posted on 03/03/2017 5:19:08 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet; Lazamataz
Here is your beloved Ny Slimes doing what it does 24/7 lying and removing photos of one of its liberal heros! DEVASTATING PROOF OF MEDIA BIAS: New York Times Airbrushes Away Democrat’s Embarrassing False Claim Red State ^ | 3/2/2017 | by Patterico Posted on 3/3/2017, 5:11:12 PM by Lazamataz Jay Caruso noted that Senator Claire McCaskill had claimed early today never to have met with a Russian ambassador: Follow Claire McCaskill ✔ @clairecmc I've been on the Armed Services Com for 10 years.No call or meeting w/Russian ambassador. Ever. Ambassadors call members of Foreign Rel Com. 7:06 AM - 2 Mar 2017 13,293 13,293 Retweets 20,929 20,929 likes Then undeniable documentary and photographic evidence emerged that she had. I bet she wishes she could just airbrush that initial tweet from history — like it never happened. Kinda like the New York Times did today with her claim. They reported it — and then, when they figured out it was wrong, they simply vanished it. Whoosh. Presto-change-o! It was never there. Did you hear me? It was never there. Earlier today, The Times — and yes, I will name the reporters; they are Eric Lichtblau, Michael D. Shear, and Charlie Savage — published an article titled Democrats Call for Sessions to Recuse Himself From Russia Inquiry. (It now reads Jeff Sessions Recuses Himself from Russia Inquiry.) As the day went on, The Times revised the article in various ways, using the same URL, never noting their edits. But my favorite edit came to the following paragraph, which was in the original story: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3531236/posts Anyne who quotes/uses the NY Slimes to slime our president or his choices is no better than the Slimes.
19 posted on 03/03/2017 5:19:54 PM PST by Grampa Dave (We are winning every day, while the Dems and Never Trumpsters are whining every day!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

You are letting Fake News confuse you. Stop it


20 posted on 03/03/2017 5:20:20 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson