Skip to comments.
Is New York Times signaling that SCOTUS nominee Neil Gorsuch is pro-homosexual?
https://www.lifesitenews.com ^
| March 3, 2017
| Peter LaBarbera
Posted on 03/03/2017 5:03:03 PM PST by NKP_Vet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
So many great conservative judges, fine Christians, that Trump could have chosen and for some reason this man is picked to replace Scalia. Makes no sense because Gorsuch sounds like a clone of Anthony Kennedy.
1
posted on
03/03/2017 5:03:03 PM PST
by
NKP_Vet
To: NKP_Vet
Dude, seriously, the New York Times routinely lies.
It’s less than 50/50 that this is accurate, too.
Probably 20/80 with the lie being 80.
2
posted on
03/03/2017 5:05:10 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
To: NKP_Vet
President Trump, Please consult with the Almighty before going through with your nominations. If not, there will be TROUBLE ahead. You can count on it. Just read the Bible.
3
posted on
03/03/2017 5:05:19 PM PST
by
Maudeen
(No one on this earth is too far gone for Jesus.)
To: NKP_Vet
at least he’s not a snake handler. He’s not a snake handler is he?
To: NKP_Vet
and striking down Texass anti-sodomy law.Besides, Souter's decision here was the right one. Consenting adults can stick whatever, wherever.
5
posted on
03/03/2017 5:06:40 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
To: NKP_Vet
The Heritage Foundation told Trump this was their #1 pick from the list they gave him!!! I don’t know that I believe ANY of the reporting on Gorsuch Billy Graham, and MANY other pastors are EXTREMELY happy with Gorsuch!!!
6
posted on
03/03/2017 5:09:18 PM PST
by
Kit cat
(Yosemite Sam raising hell)
To: NKP_Vet
I have never met a Catholic who converted to the Episcopal cult who was not radically pro-gay and radically pro abortion.
7
posted on
03/03/2017 5:09:55 PM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Die Gedanken sind Frei)
To: NKP_Vet
Can you offer proof OTHER than what the Times says?
Because this sounds like psy-ops in order to turn voters against Trump.
You know, just like everything else the Times writes.
8
posted on
03/03/2017 5:10:34 PM PST
by
Luircin
(Dancing in the streets! Time to DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
To: NKP_Vet
Junk and fake news as usual from the NY Slimes!
9
posted on
03/03/2017 5:11:54 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(We are winning every day, while the Dems and Never Trumpsters are whining every day!!!)
To: NKP_Vet
This is the third post from you about Gorsuch in a few days from the same source...New York Times...
10
posted on
03/03/2017 5:12:33 PM PST
by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
To: NKP_Vet
Trump team maybe didn’t consider who his pastor was. No vetting process is fullproof. If he can separate his own views from the Constitution and community norms and religious rights to refuse service to those whose morals are sinful and repugnant, that would be good.
To: NKP_Vet
The string “constitution” occurs only once in this article. Talk about missing the point.
12
posted on
03/03/2017 5:14:20 PM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NKP_Vet
Ummmm...
I’ve got my plate, my spoon, my knife, and my fork...
I’ve got my favorite liquid refreshment.
I’ve got my napkin in my lap and my elbows aren’t on the table.
Okay now, where’s our own? Let’s eat!
Folks, seriously, who needs the Left to destroy us?
13
posted on
03/03/2017 5:14:25 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
To: Lazamataz
“Besides, Souter’s decision here was the right one. Consenting adults can stick whatever, wherever.”
If that was the decision of the Texas Supreme Court...fine. The Federal gov’t. has no Constitutional authority to overrule states on this issue...unless -of course - you start “seeing” all sorts of “implied” rights in the Amendments. But that is a slippery-slope towards judicial tyranny.
14
posted on
03/03/2017 5:14:46 PM PST
by
Bishop_Malachi
(Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
To: Lazamataz
You may be right, but that church he attends sounds like they don’t believe much from God’s Word. I’ve been pro-Trump since June 2016, but on side of him that does NOT thrill me is his approving relationship with homos of all different stripes.
15
posted on
03/03/2017 5:15:17 PM PST
by
Tucker39
(In giving us The Christ, God gave us the ONE thing we desperately NEEDED; a Savior.)
To: NKP_Vet
Based upon the reasoning in the article, if Gorsuch will be a pro homo vote because of the church he went to, then how do we explain Princess Pelosi and Justice Scalia as having different position, yet both belonged to the Catholic Church?
I say beware of the NY Slimes.
16
posted on
03/03/2017 5:17:16 PM PST
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: NKP_Vet
Wow! You are so easy to roll.
What difference does his personal opinions make. He is a strict constructionist and will base his opinions on what is in the Constitution
To: Lazamataz
Dude, seriously, the New York Times routinely lies.I never trust the anti-American, pro-Communist New York Slimes. Why would I trust it this time? I trust the judgment of President Trump.
18
posted on
03/03/2017 5:19:08 PM PST
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: NKP_Vet; Lazamataz
Here is your beloved Ny Slimes doing what it does 24/7 lying and removing photos of one of its liberal heros! DEVASTATING PROOF OF MEDIA BIAS: New York Times Airbrushes Away Democrats Embarrassing False Claim Red State ^ | 3/2/2017 | by Patterico Posted on 3/3/2017, 5:11:12 PM by Lazamataz Jay Caruso noted that Senator Claire McCaskill had claimed early today never to have met with a Russian ambassador: Follow Claire McCaskill ✔ @clairecmc I've been on the Armed Services Com for 10 years.No call or meeting w/Russian ambassador. Ever. Ambassadors call members of Foreign Rel Com. 7:06 AM - 2 Mar 2017 13,293 13,293 Retweets 20,929 20,929 likes Then undeniable documentary and photographic evidence emerged that she had. I bet she wishes she could just airbrush that initial tweet from history like it never happened. Kinda like the New York Times did today with her claim. They reported it and then, when they figured out it was wrong, they simply vanished it. Whoosh. Presto-change-o! It was never there. Did you hear me? It was never there. Earlier today, The Times and yes, I will name the reporters; they are Eric Lichtblau, Michael D. Shear, and Charlie Savage published an article titled Democrats Call for Sessions to Recuse Himself From Russia Inquiry. (It now reads Jeff Sessions Recuses Himself from Russia Inquiry.) As the day went on, The Times revised the article in various ways, using the same URL, never noting their edits. But my favorite edit came to the following paragraph, which was in the original story: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3531236/posts Anyne who quotes/uses the NY Slimes to slime our president or his choices is no better than the Slimes.
19
posted on
03/03/2017 5:19:54 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(We are winning every day, while the Dems and Never Trumpsters are whining every day!!!)
To: NKP_Vet
You are letting Fake News confuse you. Stop it
20
posted on
03/03/2017 5:20:20 PM PST
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson