Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Department Opens Formal Investigation on Hillary Clinton
FoxNews ^ | 06/21/2017 | Rachel Sutherland

Posted on 08/08/2017 5:34:42 PM PDT by ForYourChildren

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: libertylover

Five million individuals are said to have different levels of security clearances. Why not Huma? Carlos Danger?

And we wonder why leaks can not be even restrained— never mind stopped. It will not happen until there are restrictions that are sober and serious.

Even if Hillary loses her clearance, she has access to Bill’s clearance, or Madelyn Albright’s, or the list is practically endless.


21 posted on 08/08/2017 5:46:45 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Yeah, but she said it was “a mistake”.

So, the Democrats don’t care about her multiple felonies.


22 posted on 08/08/2017 5:50:39 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Put the winked Witch in LONG TERM PRISON!!!!


23 posted on 08/08/2017 5:55:05 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
The State Department has opened a formal investigation into whether the former Democratic Presidential nominee mishandled classified information when she was Secretary of State.

While they're at it I hope they'll look into whether the sky is blue.

24 posted on 08/08/2017 5:55:15 PM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buttons12

Yeah, they’re busy trying to find a motive....


25 posted on 08/08/2017 5:58:10 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: iontheball
...window dressing.

The game plan for Hillary appears to hinge on her expiration due to natural causes, so the investigation can be dropped.

That is my cynical "take" on the quality and thoroughness of the inquiry.

26 posted on 08/08/2017 5:59:00 PM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren; All

>
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, confirmed to Fox News the investigation into Clinton and her staff.
>

Ohhhh! Ahhhhh! I’m sure their search will go along the lines of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6Bw4zyW1ig


27 posted on 08/08/2017 6:01:31 PM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

>
Why wouldn’t it be revoked at the beginning of the investigation and then possibly be reinstated depending upon the outcome of the investigation?
>

Beginning of the investigation? How’s ‘bout @ the termination of her position??

We all know the whole ‘security’ facade is only used against the pleebs. How many of these elected f*-tards couldn’t pass a general background screening, yet get access to classified/top secret??

But to allow access AFTER their term is over?? Only in govt


28 posted on 08/08/2017 6:05:50 PM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

‘Ooh, wow, now THAT is really serious..!

HOW serious is it..?

SO serious that Hillary could even LOSE HER CLEARANCE..!

Wow, that is really impressive, huh..?’

Hillary is shaking in her kitten heels. As someone pointed out, as an ex POTUS, BC has a top secret security clearance. Anything Hillary needs to know, he can get it for her.


29 posted on 08/08/2017 6:10:01 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73
I agree 100%, but since they didn't do it then, at the VERY LEAST, at the beginning of the investigation.

The whole thing is crazy. When you get fired from a job or on your last day of employment, the company IT geek deletes your account & changes the passwords as you are escorted out the door.

30 posted on 08/08/2017 6:10:23 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

They’re going to probe Hillary? Like with a Huma dildo or something?


31 posted on 08/08/2017 6:10:26 PM PDT by ImNotLying (The Constitution is an instrument for the people to restrain the government...Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

WHY? Why do they still have security clearances? It should be painfully obvious that they didn’t handle them correctly when they had them WHEN SHE WAS OUR SECRETARY OF STATE...now that she’s just another pantsuit/mumu, why the hell does she need it? So she can keep committing treason?


32 posted on 08/08/2017 6:14:52 PM PDT by blu (If you don't read the story at the link, don't comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Not quite. Actually, her game plan is the expiration of the statute of limitations, seriously.


33 posted on 08/08/2017 6:15:53 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Put the winked Witch in LONG TERM PRISON!!!!


34 posted on 08/08/2017 6:24:19 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

>>Only in DC would this sort of insanity (or criminality, a more appropriate word perhaps) would be permitted.

<<

Or enabled.


35 posted on 08/08/2017 6:26:36 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The UK has no death penalty, unless you are an 11 month old infant with no arrest history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
The State Department is known to be Democrat friendly. Why not a “special council”.
36 posted on 08/08/2017 6:27:58 PM PDT by McGruff (From now on call it McCaincare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

Why wouldn’t it be revoked at the beginning of the investigation and then possibly be reinstated depending upon the outcome of the investigation?

(((
Why reinstated at all? She is no longer at the State Department, no longer officially involved in government business.


37 posted on 08/08/2017 6:37:55 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Vacate the chair! Ryan must go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Yes, can you imagine with her team of lawyers how many DECADES and millions of dollars it would take to get to a trial?!
Still, I would pay to see her arrogant smirk wiped away.


38 posted on 08/08/2017 6:44:13 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: katykelly
Yeah , sandy burger lost his security clearance for five whole years . Not to worry , he’s got it back now

He died in 2015. Although Democrats have been known to be active after death.

39 posted on 08/08/2017 6:46:43 PM PDT by Mozzafiato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

40 posted on 08/08/2017 6:47:01 PM PDT by ex91B10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson