Surprisingly good analysis, particularly from a leftist.
Gun control is kinda like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.
Liberty comes at a price, we know that.
We cannot presume to stop every evil and avoid creating the worse evil of tyranny over Liberty; which eventually slides down the slippery slope of one tyranny added to another until nothing exists out of our Liberty but only because it squares with some government edict, and absolutely anything can be verboten by government edict.
It is not the lack of human laws allows in evil. It is the lack of G-d in a human heart.
Considering the evidence is just not the done thing these days. I was just talking about this with one of my sons, apropos of an article that said it made sense to “protest” those with whom you disagree (but avoid violence).
Why is “protest” a reasonable response to disagreement? Wouldn’t listening, researching, and disputing - in writing and with evidence - be the thing to do?
People claim to agree on a goal: fewer murders, for example, or better educational outcomes. However, many refuse to consider the evidence about what policies are more conducive to achieving the goal.
A Conservative is a Liberal who hasn’t been shot by any of the 300 million plus guns she thinks are pointed at everybody all the time, or something like that.
I don’t care what this ninny thinks. Even if he thinks that gun control IS a solution.
They’re not taking them. Period. I know what happens next and it’s worth dying for.
so i don’t care if people think that I can or cannot have guns. I simply don’t care. My constitution, the one I was born with, doesn’t give me permission it gives me a right.
I have a right to speak my mind, I have a right to pray to whatever I want to pray too and I have a right to have a gun that can not be infringed. So I’m happy that this dork thinks I can have a gun. Thats great.
But I don’t care.
What is obscured by leftist data is that “gun death” statistics include suicides and self-defense killings.
Presumably suicides would find another means if a gun was not available.
In the case of self-defense, the shooter would have been the victim if he/she hadn’t been armed.
I tweeted this a couple hours ago to my congressrat after he tweeted out a video of him pontificating about th eneed for common sense gun control. I also reminded him that the massacre in Paris last year was in a state with 100% gun control.
I also posted that he was complicit in the deaths of thousands of children just today with his vote against the US House 20 week abortion ban.
I figured I would be ignored or he’d call Twitter and whine that the mean old conservative is sending him facts and I need to be suspended. Nothing yet
Marked for later
ping
It is amazing what happens when emotional humans actually read and discover this funny little thing called a ‘fact’.
JoMa