Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia To Begin Testing Its Fearsome New "Pantsir-ME" Naval Close-In Defense System
The Drive ^ | DECEMBER 28, 2017 | TYLER ROGOWAY

Posted on 12/28/2017 7:32:18 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Russian media is reporting that the long awaited upgrade of the Kashtan (Chestnut) close-in weapon system (CIWS) will begin testing in 2018. Trials will start on a land range before moving to the sea aboard one of Russia's Project 1241 Molniya missile corvettes in the Black Sea. The country's new Project 22800 Karakurt corvettes will be the first vessels to receive the system operationally once testing is complete.

Panstir-ME appears to be something of a mix between the potent Pantsir-S1 land-mobile self-propelled anti-aircraft artillery gun system and existing Kashtan CIWS installations found on many Russian-built naval vessels dating back to the Cold War. It uses a modified version of the Pantsir's 1RS2-1E phased array radar system as well as an electro-optical/infrared targeting and identification system mounted above the radar in a similar fashion as seen on many of its ground-based cousins.

RUSSIAN MOD

Truck-mounted Pantsir-S1

There is no early warning radar system directly attached to the Panstir-M mount, like the RS1-E1 mounted on many Pantsir-S1 vehicles. Instead, early warning will be provided by the ship's radar suite and/or by a similar detached early warning radar mounted elsewhere on the ship. The system's own radar can also provide early warning detection as well as fire control functions over a more limited sector of fire.

Its main armament includes a naval version of the Pantsir's 57E6-E surface-to-air missile. This is a two-stage missile that can hit targets (aircraft, cruise missiles, drones) from half a mile to ten miles away, and from just a number of feet above the surface up to nearly 30,000 feet. These missiles are carried in four tubes on each side of the turret, and like Kashtan, twin rotating magazines below deck can reload each side four times over automatically within a matter of seconds. 32 missiles in total are carried.

Pantsir-ME will also be able to fire the Hermes-K surface-to-surface missile. Presumably, these missiles would be outfitted on the Pantsir-ME when the vessel is operating in littoral areas where small boat swarming attacks are possible, or when nearby shore strikes are required. The Hermes-K can be outfitted with a semi-active laser seeker so that near over-the-horizon targets can be hit pricelessly if a forward operating unit—such a drone, aircraft, or special operations team—is lasing the target with a laser designator. Because of the system's unique twin-magazine configuration, a mix of both missiles could be carried operationally.

ROSTEC

Pantsir-ME brochure.

Pantsir-ME's other primary armament includes a pair of very hard hitting GSh-30K six-barrel 30mm rotary cannons that can spew up to 6,000 rounds a minute each. This high volume of fire can be used to shatter incoming anti-ship missiles, aircraft, drones, or small boats. These are the same cannons found on Kashtan, and they deviate from the land-based Pantsir-S1 design, which uses the lower rate of fire, twin barreled, 2A38M 30mm cannons.

The system can operate autonomously or it can be tied to a network of similar mounts scattered around a larger vessel. It can also be integrated into the ships larger overall combat system. This flexibility allows the system to be fielded on everything from corvettes, to frigates, to destroyers, to Kirov class battlecruisers. Russia's sole aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, is currently undergoing a refit that will supposedly include installing Pantsir-ME in place of its eight existing Kashtan-M CIWS systems.

According to Rostec CEO Sergey Chemezov each Pantsir-ME mount can engage four targets simultaneously, and will have a probability of kill three to four times greater than existing Kashtan-M installations.

Like Kashtan before it, the Pantsir-ME is unique in that it integrates both a highly-agile missile and a rapid-firing CIWS gun system into a single package, and features weapons redundancy on every mount. With a much needed refresh to its control interface, its sensors, and its missiles, Russia has executed on a fairly brilliant plan that will build on the Kashtan in a logical way while also using existing components to decrease costs and lower development and integration risk.

Altogether, this new system will allow Russia to maintain credible kinetic CIWS defenses into the coming decades as the Pantsir-ME will also likely benefit to some degree from upgrades made on its land-based counterpart.

Considering the new emphasis being put on anti-ship missile capabilities by Russia's potential foes—namely the U.S. and its allies—investing in updated CIWS definitely makes sense, especially as Russia works to rebuild their hulking Cold War-era navy into a more agile and technologically advanced force. And of course the fact that the first operational units will be installed on Project 22800 corvettes, one of Russia's ambitious naval projects that could lead to sales abroad, is also a sign that having a modern CIWS system is essential when it comes to realizing naval fighting ship export success.

Although Russia is somewhat of a world leader in short-range air defense (SHORAD) capabilities, the country is unlikely to be able to compete, at least initially, with Western high-power directed energy (laser) CIWS concepts that will be emerging in the coming decades. As a result, fielding the most capable and updated kinetic CIWS systems is likely to be an increasing focus for Russia's Navy going forward, and Pantsir-ME definitely delivers on that idea.

The system is slated for operational use in the 2019-2020 timeframe.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: ciws; pantsirme; russia; warship

1 posted on 12/28/2017 7:32:18 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The dreaded PantsMe system.


2 posted on 12/28/2017 7:37:17 PM PST by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

not understanding the problem here. This sounds like the Phalanx system the US Navy has used for decades.


3 posted on 12/28/2017 7:38:21 PM PST by bioqubit (bioqubit: Educated Men Make Terrible Slaves - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

Our Harpoons are no match for these latest gen ones whatsoever. One thing we’ve needed since the 80s is a supersonic (today maybe hypersonic) anti-ship missile.


4 posted on 12/28/2017 7:40:08 PM PST by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

It’s a dual system (gun and missile).


5 posted on 12/28/2017 7:40:49 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

RoboCop version. Hmmm.

6 posted on 12/28/2017 7:52:28 PM PST by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002

why? primary anti-ship assets of the USN re subs and carrier based air craft. Besides Anti-ship missiles are huge and take up valuable ship real estate.


7 posted on 12/28/2017 7:56:18 PM PST by chemical_boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chemical_boy

True, the USSR went that route and they are almost all missile on some boats. The carrier planes still have harpoons, and I’d still like to see an upgrade.


8 posted on 12/28/2017 8:06:31 PM PST by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002

Can these shoot down lazorZ? Railgun projectiles? Flying and submerged drone swarms?

Expected deployments are about the same time. ;)

Navy getting cool AF again.


9 posted on 12/28/2017 8:16:49 PM PST by 1_Inch_Group (Country Before Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

These are nice little corvettes and we could use a couple of dozen.

An 800t platform with endurance, speed and effective weapons. Cheap (2bil rubles)or $34million each. I’m sure that’s before a weapons outfit.


10 posted on 12/28/2017 9:06:42 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit
This sounds like the Phalanx system the US Navy has used for decades.

May sound like it, but if it works as advertised, is far more capable.

CIWS has always has a range/clutter problem. The 30mm Russian gun has better range. The Dutch Goalkeeper CIWS has always been superior with the dual band seeker to avoid multipath confusion.

The integrated missiles are like addng the RIM-116 to CIWS. I think the army toyed with something like that with the Stinger.

The use of optical/IR targeting also is a big jump over the CIWS.

11 posted on 12/28/2017 9:24:10 PM PST by doorgunner69 (No video seems to happen a lot when they shoot somebody..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

The multiple reload for the missiles is ingenious if it works. Our RIM is a one shot deal. Magazine gone, it is a deck ornament.


12 posted on 12/28/2017 9:26:06 PM PST by doorgunner69 (No video seems to happen a lot when they shoot somebody..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
For many years I've always wondered how difficult it is to reload those missile tube in our navy VLS systems. They have to put into port to get reloaded but I read that some newer missiles are much smaller and they can load 4 into 1 tube to save space.

As for our aircraft carriers they only carry 2 weapon pods of 21 missiles each in the best configuration. I'd much prefer a bigger load of maybe 60-100 missiles per pod since you know that in a real shooting war the enemy would be sending salvoes at a time and not singles.

Sometimes I really wonder if the guys in the top brass really know what they are doing.

13 posted on 12/28/2017 11:37:30 PM PST by prophetic (Trump is today's DANIEL. Shut the mouth of lions Lord, let his enemies be made the Cat Food instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Keep it away from the Fagot anti-tank missiles.


14 posted on 12/29/2017 12:43:32 AM PST by rfp1234 (I have already previewed this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; Chode

6 barrels x 6000 rounds EACH per minute=36,000 RPM...

Am I reading and understanding this right ?

What do they load them with a frickin’ Dump Truck ?


15 posted on 12/29/2017 12:44:47 AM PST by mabarker1 (Progress- the opposite of congressl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1
six barrels only one firing at a time = 6000rpm

our miniguns back in the day could run 6000rpm but they had to start out at 3000(normal firing rate) and ramp up to 6000(mind you in the blink of an eye) because it put tooo much strain on the linkage

newer guns might have solved that problem or they might still ramp up

16 posted on 12/29/2017 9:52:12 AM PST by Chode (You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Chode

OK Thanks


17 posted on 12/29/2017 10:10:40 AM PST by mabarker1 (Progress- the opposite of congressl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson