Posted on 07/12/2018 11:41:47 AM PDT by deplorableindc
FBI official Peter Strzok testified Thursday that he can't recall using his work computer to soften the wording of a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton of mishandling classified information.
Strzok conceded during a joint hearing of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees that metadata indicates his computer made the change, but said he can't remember doing it.
The June 2016 edit changed "grossly negligent," a term that carries legal liability under the Espionage Act, to "extremely careless."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
That’s wild! Hillary can’t remember either!
Is there a chance Peter Strzok is related to Joe Btfsplk? ;^}
Congress wouldn’t go anywhere with such a ball today, and Donald would continue to tweet taunts about it.
I think if trump does not fire them and gut and reform the intel before they indict him, then the coup is complete..
I remember hillary saying “I’m sorry, I can’t recall.”
Trump: You and what army
SO FIBG WHAT member number 500 and change newbie.
Trump might not even care: this to him would be another angle by which to wangle a red wave.
Funny you should bring that up. The IG has already acknowledged that Peter failed his routine polygraph but the system allowed him to keep his clearance.
Everybody should watch some of Stroznyk’s testimony when Gowdy was questioning him. Stroznyk’s facial expressions, his smart-*ss answers, his excuses, and his arrogance are truly frightening
It doesn’t matter if he can recall or not. Get him to explain the difference. Then ask him if he had anyone urge him to make the change on Mrs Clinton behalf. If he can’t remember, then take that as a “no” since that would be a pretty big deal.
If she were indicted, her campaign would be over, yes or no? Then you sir, must have made the decision on your own and we already have substantiated you don’t like Prez Trump and did not want to see him become Prez. Don’t make it a questions, make it a statement.
You’re thinking of Obama’s UN Ambassador, Samantha Powers who unmasked over 250 names, but then said that she didn’t do it, and that somebody else must have done it in her name. She never offered an explanation of how that could have happened. And nothing has happened to her.
That could be called a blind rage
I wonder did the GOP pick up on Strzok’s claim he wasn’t fired by Mueller for bias. Mueller didn’t mind the bias, just the public “perception” of it.
“Can’t recall”? Well, he’ll walk.
should be it worked for, 76 is a hard age.
Someone should have asked him whether, as a high-level FBI agent, didn’t he have a responsibility to keep his computer secure? - and how and when was his computer vulnerable?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.