Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Need A Systematic Polling Error To Win The House
Hot Air ^ | 4 Nov 2018 | Nate Silver

Posted on 11/04/2018 7:41:57 AM PST by mandaladon

The reason it’s counterintuitive is because you can’t really identify 23 districts that are safe bets to flip to Democrats, which is the number they need to take the House. In the Deluxe version of our model (the one I’ll be focusing on here) only 193 seats are considered by our model to be “solid Democratic” (at least a 95 percent chance of a Democratic victory). If Democrats won only those seats and no others, they’d actually lose two seats from the 195 they control now. Another 15 seats are “likely Democratic,” where Democrats have at least a 75 chance of winning. Win those as well, and Democrats are … still up to a net gain of only 13 seats.1

The model then has 34 seats between its three most competitive categories: “lean Democratic” (8 seats), “toss-up” (16 seats) and “lean Republican” (10 seats). If Republicans win 24 of those 34 seats — assuming everything else went to form — they’ll keep the House.

How hard is that? Because of the possibility of a systematic polling error, it isn’t really that hard at all. If there’s a typical polling error of 2 to 3 percentage points and it works in Republicans’ favor, the House would be a toss-up. We might not even know the winner for several days as everyone waits for additional mail ballots to be returned from California. Thus, the Lite forecast gives Republicans a 2 in 9, or 22 percent, chance of keeping the House based on the possibility of a systematic polling error. Their chances are 18 percent in Deluxe and 15 percent in our Classic version, meanwhile.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2018election; 2018midterms; 2020election; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2018; election2020; elections; fakepolls; mediawingofthednc; natesilver; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; smearmachine; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
If Republicans win 24 of those 34 seats — assuming everything else went to form — they’ll keep the House.

How hard is that? Because of the possibility of a systematic polling error, it isn’t really that hard at all. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Systematic polling error" new excuse from Silver...

1 posted on 11/04/2018 7:41:57 AM PST by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Hot Air posted an article by Nate Silver?!

That place is completely trashed.


2 posted on 11/04/2018 7:44:06 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

go nate, go nate, go nate! FUBAR!


3 posted on 11/04/2018 7:44:18 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Garbage in, ...


4 posted on 11/04/2018 7:45:03 AM PST by Crawdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Nate Silver backtracking and trying to cover his a$$. Republicans are going to keep the House and add Senators.


5 posted on 11/04/2018 7:45:17 AM PST by freedom1st (Beware the Beto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

If the polls are correct, it would be the first time ANY media reported the truth in the past 2 years! This enthusiasm we see... and the dead party dems, with nothing to offer but destroying our nation with their revenge and anger.. and this is supposed to be close? Dead heat?

Wasn’t born yesterday.. seen too many dirty tricks. Are you going to believe the “media” or your own eyes!


6 posted on 11/04/2018 7:46:30 AM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom1st

Except for mittens right? We can safely lose his seat, right?


7 posted on 11/04/2018 7:48:01 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Hey Nate!

You're just the guy to provide us with "A Systematic Polling Error To Win The House"!!!!

8 posted on 11/04/2018 7:48:23 AM PST by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

I guess the Swamp got to Nate after he said yesterday he was having doubts of a Blue Wave. They’re gripping on the other side. I know the House is gonna be tough to hold, but we can all feel the same excitement for this midterm election on our side as we had two years ago when we elected Trump! The Big MO is definitely on our side!


9 posted on 11/04/2018 7:48:46 AM PST by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Given the results last time, I’d say that “systematic polling error” is more likely than not.

And this is after them tweaking things to bring polls a nudge closer to reality than they were before.


10 posted on 11/04/2018 7:49:05 AM PST by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

The Kavanaugh thing made a lot of people understand the gravity of the situation and the true nature of current year Democrats.


11 posted on 11/04/2018 7:49:56 AM PST by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

We have it then, the polls are rigged.


12 posted on 11/04/2018 7:50:58 AM PST by bigbob (Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

has Nate corrected for the same systemic polling error that affected his 2016 prediction?
No.
He is simply stating that 2018 could be the same as 2016.


13 posted on 11/04/2018 7:51:02 AM PST by dontreadthis (A TIMELINE OF TREASON on Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Will be the second time in 2 years.....


14 posted on 11/04/2018 7:51:39 AM PST by trebb (Those who don't donate anything tend to be empty gasbags...no-value-added types)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Silver is trying inoculate himself from criticism when the GOP wins on Tuesday.


15 posted on 11/04/2018 7:52:03 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

but the Dems are loading trunks with absentee ballots, etc - just in case. i’m planning on a lot of “found” ballots in tight districts, if needed. from experience.


16 posted on 11/04/2018 7:52:09 AM PST by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

I’ll start believing Nate Silver when he starts delivering on his predictions. He became famous when he got lucky, or perhaps he did it when poll data was reliable, not sure which. Since then, his record has been spotty to say the least. We’ll see how he does this time out.


17 posted on 11/04/2018 7:54:11 AM PST by centurion316 (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry; bigbob; thoughtomator
Maybe if Nate looked at Rasmussen, he'd find some real intelligence on this topic.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 60% of Likely Democratic Voters say they are more likely to let others know how they intend to vote this year compared to previous congressional elections. This compares to 49% of Republicans and 40% of voters not affiliated with either major political party.

18 posted on 11/04/2018 7:56:46 AM PST by DoodleBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rktman

RATs can kiss our collective rear ends.


19 posted on 11/04/2018 7:58:05 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Dems are confident about House despite painful 2016 memories~~~~~~~Democrats on Wednesday morning
20 posted on 11/04/2018 7:59:14 AM PST by mandaladon (It's always good to be underestimated. ~Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson