Bull crap! Assume ALL voting machines are potentially not secure and are subject to manipulation. ALWAYS have paper ballots that can be audited when/where necessary.
I don’t care what they say. I wouldn’t trust this system one bit. What I trust are all the old manual systems that have not had all of there checks and balances removed.
Of course none of it does any good if you don’t verify who is actually voting.
Bump for later.
NSA will give final approval.
Okay ... do a bunch of stuff electronically, but always have the initial paper ballot. That’s essential.
as long as it has paper receipts and publishes all votes to a public block chain... then your vote can be verified and the chain can be checked against any tampering
So the same people who tap our phones, track our lives through Facebook, and police the Internet through fronts that purport to spot “fake news” also want to secure our voting system—goodie, I feel more secure already. /s
A project like this needs someone in charge who is universally trusted with a sterling reputation, like Robert Mueller. /s
Oregon-based firm called Galois, a longtime government contractor
This in itself says volumes
Doesn’t matter how secure the voting is - it matters who counts the votes.
It doesn’t matter how “secure” it is, if non citizens get to vote, if people vote multiple times due to multiple residences, or if others vote for the elderly.
I can make you win, but it will cost you.
I’d rather they register your eye scan. Pass it as a citizen, go vote. Fail it as a non-citizen or a multiple time voter, blinded immediately.
DARPA being tied to the bureaucracy, has a dog in this fight and I wouldn’t trust any DARPA voting system any more than I trust the vote counters in Broward County.
Look up the political contributions for Galois for 2016. They all went to crazy Bernie.
If you would like more information about what’s happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me. Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.