Posted on 11/10/2019 2:48:28 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
NSA Robert O’Brien says Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a top witness in the House impeachment inquiry, will be removed from his post at the White House National Security Council.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
I have the impression Fred Nerks is posting from the basement of the Saudi Arabian embassy.
He also has a side job at al Jazeera.
He gets a penny a post, so he has keep churning them out.
He likes Tlaib, Omar, CAIR, Iran, Valerie Jarrett, Keith Ellison, al Jazeera, Ahmadinejad, the Institute for Historical Review, CAIR, Hezbollah, David Irving, Eichmann, Mengele, Himmler, Bradley Smith, Robert Faurisson, Arthur Butz, Willis Carto, and of course his hero, Goebbels.
Almost sounds like MG Robert E “The Dueler” Wagner during his time as the 60th Colonel of the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment.
I would not court martial him because it will make him a symbol of the resistance. There are administrative actions that can be taken against him. For starters, pull his security clearance for his private dealings with Ukraine and fomenting dissent against the President and United States with a foreign entity while on active duty. A clear violation of his oath if true. Once his security clearance is pulled send him to an administrative posting way outside of Washington DC. He can stay until he retires or retire now. Without a clearance no contractor will touch him, State will not want him and he will not be wanted by any major Ukraine Corporation since he will no longer have access to any power players. He violated his oath in so many ways if news reports are correct. He deserves to be courtmartialed and reduced in rank to the last rank he served “honorably” in. He could be retired as a Major or even a Captain. But why make him a martyr on CNN. He can work as an interpreter but with no clearance maybe with a law firm or something.
Excellent!
We know that the media and Democrats will make all sorts of noise about any prosecution, they'd call it Obstruction of Justice, like they do everything that interferes with their troublemaking.
But the fact is that when this sort of stuff gets a pass because of fear of the political blowback, it will continue to happen.
He should be in the brig awaiting his article 92 court martial.
Travis,
All I’m seeing when I go to that link is a 1-second vid. Looks like youtube has scrubbed it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRJwpAB4T4E
Soros connections as well? Or do I even need to ask...
Thanks to your reposts, I can see what he’s showing us.
Hmmm ... a curious connection, too ... what’s up with that?
Well, duh. The man’s a political spy for the Democrat Party.
I’m a very simple man, so please use small words to explain away what he is showing me.
Thanks!
Goebbels relied on simple men like you and your buddy Nerks to circulate his poison.
And was not allowed to utter one word in his own defense
I'm proud of mine.
True that!
Reminds me of the guy in “a few good men” who off’d himself
My 1st husband was an E-4 -Air Force when we got married, and even though my mom taught me how to be a proper military spouse, she had almost always remained on the ranch with us kids and other family whenever my dad was stationed someplace outside of Texas, my husband expected me to bring our cub and be with him-so like your wife, I gritted my teeth and smiled a lot-my pet peeve was the wives who were like giggling 14-year-olds, always talking about clothes and hair, organizing shopping trips, etc-seemed like a total waste of time to a girl used to jeans, boots and ranch work...
When I married MrT5, he was a LTC, and within a few years of retirement, so I didn’t have to observe the protocol of military wives as much...
About half of the women out here have been military wives-including the wife of a retired general who is a ranch store owner-she got together a group of women-all former military wives-to gather once a month to play bunco and have snacks and drinks at one another’s homes. The 1st get together was at her home-a country estate that none of the rest of us could afford-we found ourselves being directed to the dining room table and being seated according to our husbands’ former military rank-the local dentist’s husband had been a LTC, so I found myself seated next to her-we were both really annoyed, and she said to Ms general-look XXXX, our husbands are civilians, we all have civilian jobs now, but if you insist on following that protocol of rank, then seat us by the spouse’s civilian “rank”.
She pointed out that the sheriff’s wife should be seated at the head of the table, because even though he retired as a Senior Master Sergeant, he was now the head of local law enforcement and outranked everyone else-Ms general was not amused, and the get-togethers did not get off the ground because we were all only too pleased to be civilian wives now...
I’m still not making the jump to light speed and still don’t get what you’re trying to say, but thanks for taking the time with me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.