Posted on 11/29/2019 8:30:47 PM PST by be-baw
House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) wrote to President Donald Trump Friday, giving him until Friday, Dec. 6., to answer whether he and his lawyers would participate in the “impeachment inquiry.”
...
Nadler added that Trump is being investigated for obstruction of justice, relating to actions described by Mueller in the second volume of his report, though Mueller did not recommend prosecution and Attorney General William Barr rejected obstruction charges against Trump on the merits.
...
Nadler has invited the president and his counsel to call and question witnesses, in accordance with the House resolution authorizing the impeachment inquiry last month — though the president was not allowed to do so in the Intelligence Committee inquiry. However, Nadler and the Democratic majority on the committee can overrule requests for witnesses.
In addition, the House Rules Committee warned last month that Nadler would be allowed to limit the president’s ability to call witnesses if he does not provide witnesses and documents the committee wants.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Is it true that Nadler’s deadline carries a lot of weight? Or is that just his waistline? Lol.
I got it from Conservative Treehouse. That is one of my first mandataory daily reads. “Sundance” who is the guy behind CTH is brilliant, and is weeks ahead of the pack.
- - - - - - -
Chairman Nadler Sends White House and Republicans More Deadlines for Fast-track December Impeachment Effort…
Posted on November 30, 2019 by sundance
Candidate Trump was framed for stealing a horse; President Trump was subsequently accused of trying too hard to avoid hanging for it. Prosecutor Mueller eventually conceded that Trump didn’t steal the horse; however, by then the focus was on Trump’s efforts to avoid the hanging. Eventually Mueller testified; it surfaced there was never a horse to begin with… Impeachment was stalled. Prosecutor Jerry Nadler is attempting to resurrect a legal theory that President Trump can still be hung for attempting to avoid the hanging, even if there was no horse theft.
“I would love to see a Tweet from President Trump telling him to stick his “inquiry” where the sun won’t shine.”
Exactly! That’s the basis for PDJT’s popularity along us “deplorables”; he gives the Establishment the finger, tells them to stick it, and dares them to respond.
The typical Dem response is “Harrumph, harrumph”.
Trump telling The Waddler to go bleep himself will add a million votes to his total in 2020 at the very least.
I am long since done with “civility”. The domestic enemies of this country have dispensed with it long ago.
I won’t be inclined to pick it up again while our enemies are trying to drive this Republic into tyranny and insolvency.
Trump Should Absolutely Not Cooperate With The Judiciary Hearings
CTH,,,
I poked around,
Interesting but
I’m not Face book type.
Dumped drudge for
Citizens Free press.
Thanks!
Na na, na na na na, hey hey, GOOD BYE!
Nadler looked at CLEAR felonies by Bill Clinton, and voted against impeaching him.
Twenty years later, non-crimes by Trump are "impeachable".
Impeachment is about saying the President committed crimes and talking about impeachment, not following through. When the clock runs out, congress will drop it, the news will talk about it, and it starts up next year. As long as Congress is investigating and not prosecuting, the President has a harder time defending himself, at least in theory.
The slob should be given the back of the hand. Slapped silly and then slapped for being silly.
Yes, that is exactly what I was referring to... didn’t really feel it needed to be explained.
As a Bill Maher said on his show to Schittforbrains, “Now it just looks like you’re stalking him.” Bwaahhh hahahahahah, Bug Eyes Schittforbrains’ eyes bugged out even more, priceless!!
Fat B@st@rd is a lumbering senile incompetent lard@ss. His hearings will be dull and idiotic, very few people will watch or care.
Nice idea and so true. The basis for the reply was a great man giving his enemies the news. Not unlike DJT. The movie “Battleground” summed it up pretty well. We hold and guard Trumps back.
You’re right. It didn’t need to be expounded upon.
“Nuts” sufficed. No need for long and drawn out explanations.
You’re right. Pissoff
Look up Mr. Creosote, with John Cleese in a well known Fawlty Towers episode.
Lol I cracked up when I read that short note. No long explanation surprised me.
Aw, nuts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.