****************Boycott National Review**********************

[PrivacyChampion]

Here the link to the thread: NATIONAL REVIEW BOYCOTT

[DCPatriot]

I absolutely agree with your assessment regarding Ms. Coulter.

You'd think the men in here had never seen a pair of skinny legs before. (And, face it, she's not "all that" either).

She's got a good Conservative mind...and that should be enough.

[smorgle]

Is Ann Coulter deaf? Pres. Bush has said over and over again that is a war against terrorism, not against all Islam, or Arabs as a group, or one particular country. He keeps asking us to stay straight on this and unified. He needs, and we need, the support of as much of the Arab world as he can get. This isn't the time to play hot-headed beauty or fiery brat. It's time to be a good soldier, fall in line, and do what the commander says.

[Vigilanteman]

A salute to caring, intelligent blondes!

[vrwc54]

Boycotts, IMHO, are soooo leftist.

I LOVED Ann's second column, but there have been some GREAT articles in NR on Islamic fundamentalists and other subjects that I will still post.

I consider them a valuable source.

[Robert-J]

You're just jealous. She has nothing to apologize for.

[tomkat]

allrightythen

Idiot since at least September 28th, 2001

[go-ken-go]

Converting them is probably the worse you could do to them - thats all she was getting at. It was a great article, I don't know what everyone in an uproar over. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

[.30Carbine]

Agreed. Let her rip.

[T'wit]

> Sorry, I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for Buckley.

Nor I, but Bill Buckley retired in 1990. This is Rich Lowry's doing, not Buckley's. Lowry gutted the senior staff when he came in to make room for his no-talent friends. The magazine has not been itself since.

[tomkat]

ditto Buckley's influence on me.

and good points re NR's 'leadership'.

[Publius6961]

There is a difference between hysterics and righteous anger.
The true character of people comes out indelibly under extreme stress. The cowards and the appeasers, those who will tolerate anything as long as they feel safe and snug, morally superior and smug, are everywhere...

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~~ John Stuart Mill ~~

[.30Carbine]

A different sort of blonde...

[Greatgrandma]

Right on, Ann. This woman speaks the truth too many are afraid to face.

[BunnySlippers]

I'm not going to boycott William Buckley's National Review. And certainly not over Ann Coulter who is often out of line.

[2020x100]

"... she exudes a visual pheromone to the male population on this board....

That could be because ANN COULTER IS A MAN!

Hard to believe, huh? Take a good look at her wrists...more importantly "her" Adams apple.

...find a high school picture of her...

go head... ~~~~

More on topic: Bout time National Review fired her. The estrogen shots combined with all that left-over high-overdrive testosterone must have sent "her" grand mal rhetoric attacks into fatal overdrive...

No matter. "She'll" be melting into obscurity soon.

[an amused spectator]

As I said before, I am saddened to see that she does not have the grace and humility to publicly apologize for her irresponsible article.

Are you sure that it is irresponsible? Do you REALLY know the enemy? I find it interesting that the only openly practicing slavers in the world today are Islamic practioners.

Do you know what a kafir is? Perhaps you should do some reading, THEN pass judgement on Ms. Coulter. I don't recall her actually committing the act of suicide-bombing against her enemies the Clintons, n'est-ce pas?

[HangFire]

BTTT!

[goldenapplesofthesun]

"As I said before, I am saddened to see that she does not have the grace and humility to publicly apologize for her irresponsible article. I never thought that Falwell was a humble sort of person. I'm surprised by his apology and I have a new respect for him."

"Appologize" for what, Kay? As is typical of Liberals, you can't even articulate whatever Coulter's 'sin' was. This is because Liberalism is incoherent upon deeper analysis, so its only way of advancement is through vague campaigns of 'shaming' its opponents into submission.

Kay, why don't you explicitely detail what Coulter said that was wrong, and what principles it violated? Since you won't be able to do even that bare minimum, have a nice day (or was it 'Make my day'?), Kay.

Golden