Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dowd: Talkin' Ain't Fightin'
The New York Times ^ | 11/07/2001 | maureen dowd

Posted on 11/06/2001 7:44:10 PM PST by Pokey78

WASHINGTON -- It's not easy to demonize a demon. But President Bush is trying.

The Evil One is getting eviler and eviler.

Al Qaeda terrorists, Mr. Bush said yesterday, speaking by satellite to an audience of European leaders gathered in Warsaw, "are seeking chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Given the means, our enemies would be a threat to every nation, and eventually to civilization itself."

It's been known for years that Osama bin Laden wanted to go nuclear. So why would the president gild the plutonium lily by invoking a nuclear threat now, when Americans are already wincing and flinching their way through life? Why put fangs on a vampire?

It reminded me of the first Bush team's hyperventilating attempt to convince Americans that we should go to war with Iraq over Kuwait, which ranged from Bush senior comparing Saddam to Hitler to James Baker justifying it on economic grounds: "Jobs, jobs, jobs."

But this time everybody's on board with the goal, even if some allies and segments of the European public are concerned about tactics.

The allied governments agree that bin Laden needs to be taken out. And Europeans have pressed their combat troops on a reluctant Bush administration, which had mistakenly preferred the flexibility of a more unilateral approach but is now giving in to British pleas for a more multilateral one.

The Evil One's latest video was a flop in this country. TV pretty much ignored it, newspapers buried it, and reporters had to go to the C.I.A. or to London or India to even find a complete translated text. In a way, the White House was hoist on its own censorship petard because Osama's ranting insults of the U.N. and Muslims who support America could well have worked against him had the video gotten wider play.

The president should not have to pump up his case with ominous threats in the future. He can simply point to the past. The rubble is still smoking in New York. He should put down the bullhorn and tell Rummy to get moving.

Mr. Bush may have wanted to turn up the volume on Osama again to divert attention from law enforcement failures to get any break in the anthrax and hijacking cases.

When he attacked the U.S., bin Laden unleashed several American phobias: The yuppie fear of germs. The boomer fear of not living up to the greatest generation. And the post-Vietnam fear of risking ground troops in unfamiliar and harsh terrain.

But we will have to come to grips with that last fear if we want to make good on our promise to rid the world of Al Qaeda.

Right now we are using beards as beards, trying to prop up the Northern Alliance and hoping that somehow a Southern Alliance will materialize like a genie from Aladdin's lamp.

But the stories about the lame rebel force with its wooden saddles and line of old Russian tanks get sillier and sillier, like scenes out of the Marx Brothers or Woody Allen's "Bananas."

TV footage shows troops practicing taking hills, and confused about whether they are supposed to advance or retreat after they win a battle with the Taliban.

We've been trying to use the Northern Alliance to lure the Taliban out of holes so we can drop 15,000-pound Daisy Cutter bombs on them. These proxies, who smoke and complain more than they fight, can help. But they are not the key to victory.

Our military plan has been too much of a political plan. So far we have been trying to do it on the cheap, with minimal risk, putting off the prospect of ground forces until the last possible moment.

If we really believe that Osama represents a potential nuclear threat to civilized Western life, as Mr. Bush said yesterday, we better be prepared to put our forces where our rhetoric is instead of waiting patiently with a fingers-crossed strategy.

But right now our leaders do not seem to be sure if they are prepared to wait months or years. The Air Force has a bomb it can steer horizontally from an F-15E into the mouth of a cave, but we are not likely to get bin Laden that way.

So keep on bombing. Keep bribing feudal chieftains. Get the allies involved and let the Northern Alliance do what it can. But let's not kid ourselves.

Give war a chance. But if it does not work, let's cut the chitchat and go get the rat.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Pokey78
I kick myself every time I read one of her columns. Once again, I promise myself: "I will NEVER subject myself to Dowd drivel again, as long as I live." I got to this sentence:

Mr. Bush may have wanted to turn up the volume on Osama again to divert attention from law enforcement failures to get any break in the anthrax and hijacking cases

and hit myself up side the head. I get nauseous at blatant illogic, and assertion without evidence. That's all her columns EVER contain. When will I learn?

21 posted on 11/06/2001 8:37:46 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
But this time everybody's on board with the goal, even if some allies and segments of the European public are concerned about tactics.

I think Europe ought to be damn concerned about Bin Laden's tactics, and I think anyone living over there wonders when one of their cities is gonna go boom. The question is no longer if but when...

And anyone with a brain between their ears isn't going to take Maureen Dowd's word on anything.

22 posted on 11/06/2001 8:56:23 PM PST by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Why do you suppose so many liberals advocate ground troops asap? I think they want to see casualties. That would make great election propaganda in '04.
23 posted on 11/06/2001 8:57:58 PM PST by TerryInRiverside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centexan
Osama reminds her of Michael Douglas and the war is symbolic of her struggle with Catherine Zeta Jones for his affections.

Not bad. Maybe you could tie in ethnicity, since Dowd is shanty Irish and Zeta Jones is Welsh.

24 posted on 11/06/2001 8:59:34 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: centexan

25 posted on 11/06/2001 9:00:48 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Sit down M.O. you ignorant witch. Thank God your vanity says we have to look at your ugly mug when your column is in the paper. That way we can more easily skip your childish rants. I can't believe anyone actually pays this women to hear her outlandish opinions on anything. She is a difinite candidate for cavewoman of the year.
26 posted on 11/06/2001 9:08:08 PM PST by The Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
either the b**ch is suffering from PMS or needs to get laid. She gives schizophrenia a bad name.
27 posted on 11/06/2001 9:11:54 PM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
Kinda reminds me of another know-it-all, obnoxious, bitch in bulls clothing, that texas twit, that arrogant austin ASS, Molly, the whiner, Ivins. I keep saying the same thing you do and might even make it to the last sentence in her drivel, until I am force to exclaim, after a session of projectile vomiting, NEVER AGAIN!
28 posted on 11/06/2001 9:29:12 PM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
I kick myself every time I read one of her columns. Once again, I promise myself: "I will NEVER subject myself to Dowd drivel again, as long as I live."

Yeah, but where else could you read golden phrases like "the yuppie fear of germs" or "we are using beards as beards"

29 posted on 11/07/2001 4:02:18 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I'll give her that, "beards as beards" is a good one.

Lines like that are probably what make me read her. Unfortunately, she uses her talent for eeeevil.

30 posted on 11/07/2001 5:00:12 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
She disgusts me so I can't even finish reading this clap trap......
31 posted on 11/07/2001 5:06:39 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
She disgusts me so I can't even finish reading this clap trap......

Thanks for "cutting to the chase"-- I refuse to give any creedence to her empty blather- I just will not read it anymore.

32 posted on 11/07/2001 5:22:29 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
But the stories about the lame rebel force with its wooden saddles and line of old Russian tanks get sillier and sillier, like scenes out of the Marx Brothers or Woody Allen's "Bananas."

Guess Maureen doesn't read her own paper! Come on- admit it, honey! You WANTED the Northern Alliance to fail! You had some clever punchline that you couldn't WAIT to share with us. Now, we'll never know what it was. (sigh)

33 posted on 11/10/2001 4:44:13 PM PST by sarcastro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson