Posted on 03/22/2002 11:41:11 PM PST by kattracks
Curious 'coincidence'?
The pucker factor is really getting up there for someone.
I bumped Osama bought a batch for 10 Gs
Scientists Confirm bin Laden Weapons Test
And here's another article in my list...
What does it take the NY Times five months for?Well now that is the question isn't it. If any Freeper can figure out before their first cup of coffee that the anthrax attacks followed the hijackers' itinerary and stopped when they hit the buildings - and that the likeliest source for the anthrax was Atta's contact with Iraqi spies, you can only conclude that the NYT was being a team player in not asking questions about something this obvious.
The next question is how obvious is it - after we now know about Richard Reid - that AA587 was bombed?
and the crop dusters....Thanks for the reminder! Remember: There is still a State Department owned Ayers cropduster with a armoured cockpit and long-range capbility that went missing between spraying cocoa in South America and it's return to Florida.
So there are really two mysteries I'd like solved before I check out, who sent the anthrax (were there two sets of perps--the terrorists in Florida and a domestic nutcase in New Jersey?) and then the most fun mystery, who is Deep Throat? I have a private bet going with my husband on that one.
Then, agents gave Dr. Tsonas a copy of his own notes from the emergency room visit and he read them. "I said, `Oh, my God, my written description is consistent with cutaneous anthrax,' " Dr. Tsonas recalled. "I was surprised."
The FBI was apparently on top of this before this doctor even remembered it -- it doesn't seem that they could find any trace of anthrax in places where the hijackers had been, which perhaps indicates that there had to be a separate facility involved. What if these guys had anthrax that was totally unrelated to the letters? What if there were multiple agents with anthrax? That might explain the inability to connect the dots between New Jersey and Florida.
It is impossible for the FBI to know where the hijackers were minute by minute for the months they were here. All they can do is check out known places. It's not also out of the realm of possibility that they could've passed on the anthrax to an associate from another al Qaeda cell or an al Qaeda operative with instructions to mail out the anthrax post-9/11 to cause more chaos and terror.
Every one else in this article is referred to using a professional title or full name. The low life terrorist is referred to as Mister who was killed in the crash which he and his terrorist cohorts orchestrated. Only in the NY Times, and perhaps the Washington Post, the two most liberal rags in the country ... would you see such convuluted PC crap.
Clinton's a Rapist (are you the same guy, Great Satan?) pretty clearly was right in his theory that the blackmailed U.S. government was unwilling to pin the blame on Iraq until we were ready to go to war with that country.
I would also say it is likely that, just by the number of arrests made after 9/11, we messed up the schedule on at least a handful of ops under way.
IMHO, it could be - from all these breaking news items connecting anthrax to 911 - that many Freepers will be vindicated. We've been suggesting that the government already knew Iraq was the state behind the WMD attack of al Queda but were not ready to tackle them until the Afghanistan problem had been mostly resolved to free up the military and put together the battle plan.
The timing of these "leaks" supports that idea. Cheney is completing the whirlwind tour to drum up support against Iraq following Dubya's state of the union address formally equating WMD development to terrorism.
In this week's issue, Jeffrey Goldberg reports from Kurdistan, in northern Iraq, where, in the late nineteen-eighties, Saddam Hussein waged a devastating chemical and, possibly, biological war against the Kurdish people. Today, the Kurds have achieved limited autonomy, thanks to the U.S.-British no-fly zone, but they still face the threat of ethnic cleansing. Goldberg's report also raises questions about fears of future biochemical attacks against America or Israelas well as Iraq's possible links to Al Qaeda.
IMHO
But this story is completely new, with new information. Let's review:
Previous stories have mentioned that Two of the hijackers, Marwan Alshehhi and Saeed Alghamdi, rented an apartment from the first anthrax victim.
We also know that Mohamed Atta went to a pharmacy in late August for treatment for skin and chest irritation..
This is more than just a series of coincidences. At any rate, it is beyond dispute that the cell was involved in the Florida anthrax attacks.
It seems to me that any qualified journalist or media outlet out to crack the anthrax case in the early stages, after the Florida death, would have jumped all over this lead. That's the problem with reporting these days, they report these bits and pieces of stories with news flashes and no follow up. Here at FR all of the reports seem to be investigated and pieced together so well that it puts the so-called investigative reporters to shame.
It's the New York Times style; always has been -- a leftover quaintness from its beginnings as a "polite" newspaper. Nothing to do with PC and everything to do with hidebound tradition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.