FREE REPUBLIC EXCLUSIVES DOCUMENT CLINTON RAPES / FINGER HILLARY CLINTON

Wow! Could you please ping me if there are any postings regarding those two Circuit Court hearings? Thanks.

Make no mistake. hillary clinton was never, ever some betrayed little wife. Not only was this wife aware of the sexual predation from day one, she aided and abetted the rapes and exploited the victims for decades. That is to say, to gain and maintain power, hillary clinton raped, too...

Yes, this sow certainly has raped more than one fellow human being, by ignoring and/or exploiting the horrors of her husband/s brutality, she is indeed claiming the title for herself. Senator Rape Enabling Clinton-one very sick puppy.

Despite all that has been displayed on this thread, and other Clinton Basher threads:

The best thing for America is for Hillary to seek the presidency in 2004. I hope she does!

I may be viewed as a nut case, but I am honest, and if she runs, I'll help campaign for her (if they'll have me) because I think only the likes of Hillary, along with her Villiage Utopia, can bring about much needed change in America.

Yes People, that is the case.

Only if Al Sharpton should wrestle the nomination from Hillary, would my support for her dwindle.

Is that you, CHELSEA?

Q ERTY6 _{utter failure}

_{rodham-clinton} ^{reality-check}BUMP!

Post Opinion

Email Updates

Make NYPOST.COM
Your Homepage

COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN: HAS CHELSEA GONE BYE-BYE?

November 12, 2001 -- So Chelsea Clinton is concerned that giving Americans a tax cut would leave the federal government without the funds needed to repair New York and D.C. and to assist the families of the victims ("Chelsea's 9/11 Meltdown," Nov. 9) If Chelsea had to be concerned about paying rent or servicing a mortgage - as most overtaxed working families are - instead of how many secret service agents were protecting her that day, maybe she wouldn't find a tax cut so unnecessary, after all.
Gregg Nelson
Manhattan

The former First Daughter has apparently learned well from Bubba, as her statement reeks of the "I feel your pain" mentality. As one who was quite a bit nearer to the towers than was Chelsea, I do not honestly recall having feared for my life. I know that if I had though, the last thing on my mind would be the lives of total strangers or the Bush tax cuts. Chelsea's statements are thus about as plausible as "I never inhaled" and "I did not have sex with that woman."
Adam Ferentz
Flushing

Is making up stories just part of the Clinton family legacy?
Gerry Dorman
Lindenhurst

What Chelsea should have been obsessing over is the fact that her father did nothing after the first attack on the World Trade Center. Perhaps Humpty Dumpty came to her mind because she was subconsciously picturing her father. New Yorkers have strength of character and tell it like it is. Chelsea is no New Yorker, rather, she's a Clinton, the complete opposite.
Patty Ferman
Stamford, Conn.

Instead of worrying about how President Bush's tax cut would make it impossible to rebuild New York, perhaps Chelsea should think about how her father's gross dereliction of his duties allowed it to be blown up in the first place.
Scott Knudsen
Manhattan

How is it that Chelsea Clinton is concerned that the Bush tax cut will alter our ability to pay for the damages caused by the Sept. 11 disaster? Shouldn't a graduate student at Oxford realize that the United States will issue additional debt and produce whatever money we need, or is she too busy reciting her parents' thoughts and ideas?
Frank Roughan
East Brunswick, N.J.

Chelsea may just make history for something no other woman has ever achieved, nor likely ever will.

She will twice be dubbed the First Daughter of the U.S.A

I hope her Mommy gives it a whirl!

bttt

September 11.....is this date more important and symbolic than even we can know?

Read below to SEE for yourself!!

***September 11,1998***

House of Representatives releases some 445 pages of the Starr report. Millions of people read the report on the internet.

and then....

***September 11 1999****

reports:
CONVICTED TERRORISTS set FREE By BILL CLINTON
http://www.freep.com/news/nw/qfree11.htm

(many felt that the release of the Puerto Rico Terrorists was a bid to win support for Hillary in New York from the Puerto Rico community)

***September 11, 2000****

Hillary was to be honored in New York..protests are planned.

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39afbfb003fe.htm

NEW YORK (August 30) - In a move that critics say smacks of partisan politics, the World Jewish Congress will honor Hillary Clinton next month at a black-tie fund-raising dinner here. The event is scheduled for September 11, less than two months before voters go to the polls to decide whether she or her Republican challenger, Rep. Rick Lazio, should represent New York in the US Senate.

********************
While on the Senate Floor, warnings of danger prophecy the coming terror to come...

Date: September 2000

Mr. CRAIG.

Mr. President, I came to the floor to talk about a significant date in this Nation's fight against terrorism. This week marks the Clinton-Gore administration's decision to jeopardize American lives by surrendering to one of the most violent terrorist groups ever to operate on this country's soil.

One year ago this week, President Clinton opened the jailhouse doors for 11 members of a terrorist group known as the FALN, which is dedicated to the violent pursuit of Puerto Rican independence. The FALN has claimed responsibility for some 130 bombings at civilian, political, and military sites in the United States. In all, the group murdered six Americans and maimed, often permanently, 84 others, including law enforcement officers.

On one occasion, members attacked a Navy bus in Puerto Rico killing two sailors and wounding nine others. As a result, 16 members of this violent terrorist group were convicted of dozens of felonies against the United States, and as soon as these 16 were in prison, the bombings stopped. .....

*****************************

***September 11, 2001***

Terrorists attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

I certainly hope the attack on New York on 9-11-01 wasn't a retaliation for bringing President Bill Clinton down with the STARR report!

Can you imagine if the Terrorist Network was punishing American for taking down Clinton and doing a favor for him because he released and pardoned members of the Terrorist Network!

How can we forget the LOOK of disgust of Hillary's face on Sept 20, when President Bush gave the greatest speech of his career. Caught on camera was Hillary, rolling her eyes in disgust!

And, after a memorial for the Flight 93, President Bush gave a memorial address, and when he returned to his seat (Hillary and Bill were sitting a few places down in the same row)...Hillary turned her head away from Bush in disgust.

It was plain for the world to see, that Hillary Rodham Clinton is NOT on America's side.

It is you, after all, chelsea!
Your view is perfectly understandable.
As Camille Paglia so astutely observed,
given your obvious allurement limitations,
you wouldn't be snaring the hunks
but for _{Congenital Bottom Feeder} mommy's
W I D E B O D Y. _{low-center-of-gravity}

_{Q ERTY3} ^{zipper-hoisted}

^{Q ERTY2} "There isn't a shred of evidence."
HILLARY, YOU KNOW, ^{KnowNothing Victim} Q ERTY4 ^{double bagel}
Q ERTY6 _{utter failure}
machinations.
_{chelsea rodham-clinton} ^{reality-check}BUMP!
it won't s-p-i-n
Fraudulent Democrat Scheme Fails as Bush Soars: BUSH: NATIONAL SECURITY 1^st PRIORITY. . ."I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."; THE CLINTON LEGACY PLACED IN STARK RELIEF

The Real Danger of a Presidential Fake:
Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President
CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme Fails Again
Ollie North Laughs Ann Lewis Off Stage
IT IS OBVIOUS
Helen Thomas Syndrome: THE SYMPTOMS
Will Riefenstahl-esque "editing to perfection" resurrect the clintons?
WHOSE DOG WAS WAGGED?
Frankenstein, The Sequel:
'Black Hawk Down' Was Set to Blame Clinton for 9/11
hillary clinton, Congenital Bottom Feeder, Cowers Below Network Radar,
Continues to Subsist on Cozy Clintonoid Interviews of Colmes Kind
hillary's head revisited:
hillary clinton's brain (such as it is) II
Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers

"The Daschle Scheme"
THE HILLARY, YOU KNOW, CLINTON TRANSCRIPT:: Analyzed and Annotated

JOE KLEIN UNDERMINES OWN THESIS:: "clinton was weak on terrorism"

See also:
Can the President Think?
THE MYTH OF HILLARY'S BRILLIANCE
INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS
Mindless rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy
A CLOCKWORK ORANGE
THE OTHER NIXON
OFF THE RECORD: AN OLD DOG NEEDS NEW TRICKS
The man is an artist: He's not just 'Slick Willie' anymore
Hey, what a party!
New Year's at the White House
Annotated by Mia T

There is a great deal of interest in how history is going to view Bill Clinton...Our first indication from the public does little to suggest that Clinton's image has become more positive in the 14 months since he left office. Just 51% of Americans now say they approve of the job Clinton did while in office, and a substantial 47% say they disapprove (the second-highest disapproval rating, behind only Nixon's). This marks a drop from the higher ratings he was receiving as he left office, and a slight drop even from his overall two-term average.

Clinton continues to drop in retrospective poll data. Only Nixon lower.

Gallup News Service
9/11 notwithstanding, the following (earlier) C-SPAN finding applies.: Note especially historian Douglas Brinkley's comment...
A C-SPAN survey of 58 U.S. historians has concluded that Bill Clinton is the president with the lowest 'moral authority' -- beating out Richard Nixon for last place, Monday's NEW YORK TIMES is set report.
----C-SPAN PRESIDENTS POLL: CLINTON JUDGED LOWEST IN MORALS

clinton's ranking will likely get worse over time. Economic issues fade in importance over time. Moral issues presist and grow. (paraphrase)

------Douglas Brinkley, history prof., on Washington J. discussing C-SPAN poll

I think that history will view this much differently. They will say I made a bad personal mistake, I paid a serious price for it, but that I was right to stand and fight for my country and my constitution and its principles...
-----the First Psychopath

...[bill clinton], a man who will be regarded in the history books as one of our greatest presidents.
-----Al Gore at clinton's post-impeachment rally

It is not the strength but the duration of great sentiments that makes great men.
-----Nietzsche

I suspect that, to spite us all,
Arthur Schlesinger will live to 120
just so he can write
the definitive clinton hagiography.

--------Mia T, Musings: Senatorial Courtesy Perverted

History Lesson

by Mia T

Someone--was it Maupassant?--
once called history "that excitable and lying old lady."
The same can be said of historians.

Surely it can be said of Doris Kearns Goodwin,
the archetypical pharisaical historian,
not-so-latently clintonoid,
Lieberman-Paradigmatic
(i.e., clinton is an unfit president;
therefore clinton must remain president),
intellectually dishonest,
(habitually doing what the Arthur Schlesingers of this world do:
making history into the proof of their theories).

The Forbids 400's argument is shamelessly spurious.
They get all unhinged over the impeachment of clinton,
claiming that it will
"leave the presidency permanently disfigured and diminished,
at the mercy as never before of the caprices of any Congress."

Yet they dismiss the real and present--and future!!--danger
to the presidency and the country
of not impeaching and removing
this admittedly unfit, (Goodwin)
"documentably dysfunctional," (NYT)
presidency-diminishing, (Goodwin)
power-abusing,
psychopathic thug.

Doris Kearns Goodwin and those 400 other
hog-and-bow-tied-save-clinton,
retrograde-obsessing historiographers
are a supercilious, power-hungry,
egomaniacal lot in their own right.

For them, clinton validates
what Ogden Nash merely hypothesized:
Any buffoon can make history,
but only a great man can write it.

POSTSCRIPT:

Weekly Standard writer Tucker Carlson has dubbed Princeton University historian Sean Wilentz "loser of the week" for his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee last week. The New York Times described his testimony as "gratuitously patronizing."

"Why would Wilentz risk his reputation to join the already bulging ranks of Clinton throne-sniffers?" Mr. Carlson asked Marxist historian Eugene Genovese, who guesses that "the pressure of time and the passions of the moment" got to Mr. Wilentz.

"As for why anyone would cite the Framers in defense of Clinton, Genovese seems baffled" Mr. Carlson wrote.

Mr. Genovese told Mr. Carlson: "I come from a rather tough working-class neighborhood where attitudes toward women left a great deal to be desired. ... But if anybody had said in the local pool room" some of the things President Clinton reportedly did to Monica Lewinsky, "the attitude would have been, 'That's degenerate. You don't do that to a girl, not even a whore.' The idea that the United States of America, the supreme world power, would tolerate a man in office who is a palpable moral degenerate -- the Founding Fathers would have choked."

The Washington Times---Inside Politics

it won't s-p-i-n
KNOWNOTHING VICTIMS RODHAM/CLINTON REVISITED
^{Q ERTY2} "There isn't a shred of evidence."
HILLARY, YOU KNOW, ^{KnowNothing Victim} Q ERTY4 ^{double bagel}
They ARE space aliens
reckless rodham-clinton-gore reinvention-of-government schemata
W I D E B O D Y. _{low-center-of-gravity} Dim Bulb, _{Congenital Bottom Feeder}
_{Q ERTY3} ^{zipper-hoisted}
clinton zipper vitiated by obvious spilth
_{Humpty Dummies}
Q ERTY6 _{utter failure} IT IS OBVIOUS
^{4th-Estate Malfeasance} (DEATH BY MISREPORT)
_{rodham-clinton} ^{reality-check}BUMP!

You wrote:

"because they feared death before?.. hell that's bs and we all know it.. "

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

That's funny. Because I'm a reasonably educated and relatively bright person. And I most certainly and without any reservation..don't think it bs. In fact, I think it extremely likely..given the facts that are known.

I guess the ''we'' you refer to, don't include me. Ha!! Further more, I think the "we" you refer to...includes alot of sheeple. Of course...this is all in my most humble opinion, don't you know. Ha!!

And you aren't.

bump.