Skip to comments.
Who changed the font?
4/9/2002
Posted on 04/09/2002 10:00:15 PM PDT by sinkspur
Why was the bold title font changed?
Not good.
TOPICS: Free Republic; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-231 next last
1
posted on
04/09/2002 10:00:15 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
I agree it is harder to read.
To: sinkspur
I agree. Help!
3
posted on
04/09/2002 10:06:24 PM PDT
by
tomahawk
To: Fish out of Water
Agree.
4
posted on
04/09/2002 10:06:29 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: sinkspur
What font change? Maybe because my font is set so small i can't tell.
5
posted on
04/09/2002 10:07:53 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
To: sinkspur
Not good.'Pale' must be key around here. : (
FR needs some personality!
More color! We need some BOLD colored fonts!
6
posted on
04/09/2002 10:08:51 PM PDT
by
ST.LOUIE1
To: sinkspur
Agree.
7
posted on
04/09/2002 10:08:56 PM PDT
by
Mike K
To: sinkspur
I thought something was wrong with my settings! I liked the bold better.
8
posted on
04/09/2002 10:09:00 PM PDT
by
Giddyupgo
To: sinkspur
Yeah, I thought I was the only one to notice the change. I agree, it doesn't look right.
To: sinkspur
I agree.
10
posted on
04/09/2002 10:10:35 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: sinkspur
Change for the sake of change is the ideology of a cancer cell. The previous font was much easier to read.
11
posted on
04/09/2002 10:12:36 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: sinkspur;Jim Robinson
These tiny sans serif fonts are pitiful.
Please bring back Times New Roman for article headers.
To: sinkspur
Whew.....I was worried that my eyes were going. Now I am just getting a headache squinting at the title font. :-(
To: sinkspur
This is not an improvement.
To: sinkspur
That's the only thing I don't care for, because it is so much harder on my eyes, which are not good to begin with. I much prefer the other, New Times Roman, which is what they had, to the Arial, which is what they changed to. I also think the NTR is a much prettier font. And over-all effect makes the page less attractive.
15
posted on
04/09/2002 10:21:48 PM PDT
by
RJayneJ
To: sinkspur
Not good.
To: RJayneJ
I have eye problems too and haven't been happy with ANY of the improvements. The old typeface and format were much easer to read. And I think the old FR was easier to navigate. I also liked having each post bump thread to the top....that way, you could see what the hot issues of the day were quite easily. The longer headline bar on right side is the only real improvement IMO. All the rest is sound and fury, signifying nothing.
To: sinkspur
Not good is an understatement. I'd be very happy if FR could just look (and act) like
THIS again.
I'm finding that with this new "segmented" format on FR, I have to work harder to find interesting articles, where before they were all on one forum. And I still find more current Breaking News on Drudge, etc. Hence, I spend less and less time on FR since the Big Change. Perhaps my addiction to FR has been broken at last.
18
posted on
04/09/2002 10:36:21 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
To: firebrand; stanz; Exit148; StarFan; Dutchy
New format, new font = >:-(
19
posted on
04/09/2002 10:38:03 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
To: sinkspur
I like it. If it's too small buy a bigger monitor. :-) It looks fine on my 21 inch ViewSonic! Personally, I liked the major changes made a week or so ago, then they backed 'em off. Sigh.
20
posted on
04/09/2002 10:41:05 PM PDT
by
scripter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-231 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson