Socialism = NAZI (Hitler was a socialist)

THE OMINOUS PARALLELS ^ | Leonard Peikoff

[ReaganIsRight]

Stupidy!

[Prodigal Son]

I saw this same list posted at Democratic Underground. You're a disrupter. The Nazis were lefties and by association you're one of 'em. Their (Nazi) legacy is what your politics will ultimately leave us with. Deal with it- you are evil.

[Tribune7]

Punks were pretty conservative. You could put the Dead Milkmen's "The Thing That Only Ate Hippies" on the playlist.

[ReaganIsRight]

I never posted to you. If you have more than one logon name, both should be deleted. I don't advocate censorship, but I don't like stupid people. You have been DEFINED!

[Valin]

Conservatives have often been called Nazis by the left.

Personally I love it when they do that, talk about shooting fish in a barrel. Hitler and Stalin had a real mutual admiration society going right up to the day Hitler invaded the USSR. Nazisism and communism are but two sides of the same coin.

[ReaganIsRight]

I never posted to you. If you have more than one logon name, both should be deleted. I don't advocate censorship, but I don't like stupid people. You have been DEFINED!

[Greg Weston]

I know people who think Nixon was a socialist. Guess it all comes down on how one wants to confuse things.

[ReaganIsRight]

I never posted to you. If you have more than one logon name, both should be deleted. I don't advocate censorship, but I don't like stupid people. You have been DEFINED! Screwed up and posted this to myself twice! Sorry all!

[Yardstick]

Someone should post this to DU and see what kinda reaction you get.

I just went DUmpster diving, and one of them has posted it. In fact, they've got a whole thread devoted to this thread. (I've noticed they like to start threads about us...what would they do if we weren't here to start their conversations for them?).

They are, of course, shocked -- shocked! -- that anyone could possibly group that mean-old war-mongering socialist with the funny mustache along with such socialist philanthropists as Stalin, Mao, and Castro. They've taken a break from heaping praise on Cuba's socialist dictator in their numerous "stop the embargo" threads, to heap indignant scorn upon the article that is the subject of this thread. They have declared it to be the work of far-right extremists -- apparantly having overlooked the fact that it was written by an objectivist libertarian type.

[The Great Satan]

The reason that I say this is that I recently read a biographical essay on Martin Heidegger[who supported the Nazis] And the social and political enviroment that he grew up with was traditionalist, anti-semitic, and reactionary.

Martin Heidegger, one of the founders of Existentialism and mentor to Jean-Paul Satre, was enormously influential in developing the intellectual underpinnings of the Left's assault on reason and Western values, so your example supports the underlying unity of Nazism and Marxism. (Some weasel words attempting to explain away Heidegger's passionate support for National Socialism.)

Before Heidegger became the Nazi rector of the University of Freidburg in 1933, he served as teacher and sage to four gifted students of assimilated German Jewish backgrounds. Hannah Arendt, who at 18 began a three-year love affair with Heidegger, achieved fame as a political thinker. Herbeert Marcuse, denounced by the Pope in the late 1960s, became a philosophical guru for the New Left. Hans Jonas matured into a pioneering theorist of environmentalism, serving as a touchstone for the German Green Party. And Karl Lowith became a distinguished scholar of modern historical consciousness.

- "Heidegger's Children": Sins of the Father; reviewed by James Ryerson, New York Times on the Web Book Review; December 21, 2001

[ProudAmerican2]

I never posted to you. If you have more than one logon name, both should be deleted. I don't advocate censorship, but I don't like stupid people. You have been DEFINED!

You sent me the same post message as a private message. Strange though...your public post does not include the profanity found in the private message.

Now, why would that be the case?

[ProudAmerican2]

Stupidy!

Perhaps you should learn to spell...

[ProudAmerican2]

The evening before the election in the Netherlands, Wim Kok, prime-minister and PvdA (soclialists) leader, used the national tv to warn people of voting for Pim Fortuyn (LPF), Foruyn was a dangerous man. No evidence needed, he was dangerous. This was the second time he misused his position, earlier he used a cabinet meeting to send the same message. This was clearly a display of total disrespect for democracy.

Free speech

Thom de Graaf (leader of the D'66, left-liberals) said that if Fortuyn would be in power, the Jews would have to hide again, like in WWII. This is a total lie, for Fortuyn is one of the biggest supporters of Israel and the Jews! Again, no evidence needed. Is demonizing and accusing people falsely to stop people from voting like 'respecting the democratic process'?

Free speech

Paul Rosenmoller (leader of the Greenleft) wanted to stage an 'anti-racism' rally, using multiple organizations to stop people from voting Fortuyn.

Free speech

Ad Melkert (the new and already stepped down PvdA leader, Wim Koks follow up) said Fortuyn was the strong man', comparing Fortuyn to Hitler! Is that how the socialists respect the democratic proces?

Free speech

By demonizing people with false accusations, using the media in an all out effort to stop people from voting a man with an opposing view?

Free speech

Pim Fortuyn was shot dead by an enviromentalist wacko, known in Greenleft circles. And even after Fortuyns murder the left continued the smear campaign, Paul Rosenmuller kept on refering to Fortuyn as 'extreme right'.

Right to assemble

The socialists do not respect opposing views, those who speak out will be dealt with. Lies and false accuastions are amongst the arsenal of the socialists to destroy opposition.

Free speech

[ProudAmerican2]

Perhaps you can enlighten us with an example of a European Socialist party that seized power illegally or refused to surrender power after losing an election. That is the true test of whether or not a party is acting within the political process. Most parties use inflammatory language and demonize their opponents. That is politics.

[ReaganIsRight]

I don't recall ever using profanity. I've also had problems with posts that were supposed to be to you actually being from me to me. Something's not adding up here. I have Zone Alarm on the Zip Drive and it looks like I'm late getting it installed. I don't use profanity on line, I have a Secret clearance to protect.

[stryker]

The Nazis were not socialists despite their name. I have rebutted this nonsense so many times on FR I am sick of it. Only someone without any knowledge of political philosophy could make such a claim. The Nazis lay on the far right of the traditional political spectrum, not merely trusting in the traditional institutions of the dominant culture but raising them to the level of worship, a la Edmund Burke. Despite their National Socialist rubric, they failed to nationalize a single major industry, but rather nationalized the labor force itself, which socialists would hardly do. On the contrary, socialism lay at the far left of the traditional spectrum, where the traditional institutions of the dominant culture are intentionally weakened in an effort to strike against institutionalized racism and sexism and the major industries are nationalized while the workers are free to unionize and direct the operation of the nationalized industries. This is what we find happening in the United States slowly, but with a powerful counter movement toward fascism. Both directions mean the loss of freedom. That is why I am a libertarian.

[knighthawk]

A lefties shooting a man with opposing views, after all the politicians brainwashed people Fortuyn was evil, is that free speech too?

Also very interesting is that the PvdA refuses to leave the offices they are required to leave. The LPF is entitled to that office space. But those democratic socialists won't leave, trying to fence off the LPF from being an effective party. Did I mention they still are using the national tv to cause as much damage to the LPF as they possibly can?

PS Knowingly spreading lies is slander, not free speech.

[ReaganIsRight]

Sorry, I missed a couple of letters. We type too fast online to be perfect. The message is still the same.

[jodorowsky]

Coca Cola appeals to the desire to transform society into a timeless stasis where there is "Always Coca-Cola", while Pepsi is the choice of the new generation who align themselves with the joy of cola in and of itself.

[stryker]

And?