Skip to comments.
But Officer, I Didn't Do Anything!
Tampa Tribune ^
| Jul 22, 2002
| JIM SLOAN
Posted on 07/23/2002 9:26:02 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-137 next last
To: handk
hahaha that's funny.
To: RightWhale
The right to travel freely IS a God-given right. Public rights-of-way are maintained by government in furtherance of that right. Granted they should be privatized, but there you are. Sorry, you are dead wrong.
102
posted on
07/23/2002 2:38:34 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: Boonie Rat
$500.00 per word per question with a 100-word, 3-question minimum. Cash in advance, if I have to bill you it's triple. AND I get to revoke my answers.
103
posted on
07/23/2002 2:44:01 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: dcwusmc
Public rights-of-way are maintained by government in furtherance of that right. When the first government interstate was built during John Quincy Adams admin, he had to go against general outcry that government shouldn't be doing that. He lost a lot of political points in getting his road built.
Those who insist freedom to travel is a god-given right are losing. Right to privacy is also nearly gone, has been since the 60s. All these things are going away, and not because they are rights or not, but because we aren't using the correct terminology correctly. Law is all about the meaning of words, law and logic are almost synomymous in modern language, etymologically identical in root. Property rights are not cast in stone in the Constitution or the Bible; property rights are a result of caselaw. That's where it is, and that's where you have to go to start dealing with this. Vague recitation and suggestion of possible unenumerated rights accomplishes nothing.
To: headsonpikes
Next time ask your mommy if you can use the computer before you attack a decent American.
To: nanny
Come on, Nanny. Of course I do.
To: freeeee
Outragous. Intolerable. Rediculous. Abusive.And completely part of the landscape in America these days.
To: FryingPan101
if that means turning the guy next door in to authorities because he sells pipe bombs at garage sales, you better believe I will.Well, yeah!
However, he should not be turned in if he is selling them at hardware meets.
To: FryingPan101
I am so sorry. I always get upset when others don't understand the gist of my posts. Again, I am sorry.
109
posted on
07/23/2002 3:13:40 PM PDT
by
nanny
To: FryingPan101
"Next time ask your mommy..."
Oh, yeah; that's decent.
To: TightSqueeze
bump for later
To: agrace
sounds like a FALSE ARREST. The courts have said they can have "sobriety" checkpoints, but any other pull over with legal justification is in fact a FALSE ARREST.
112
posted on
07/23/2002 3:28:34 PM PDT
by
stumpy
To: All
This can NOT be legal.I know the law is an a$$, but this is unreal!.To those of who drive I-4, any additional road hazard, especially one caused for such an assinine excuse is sheer lunacy.
Since we have more than our fair share of lawyers around here, I expect several lawsuits to contradict the "lawyer" who thinks this foolish activity is "legal".
Wonder who will pay for them?
To: sarasmom
So next time there is a "semblance" of a police roadblock, I can ignore it and tell the trooper I thought they were conducting an opinion survey, and I do not respond to "surveys' unless I am paid for them.
To: TightSqueeze
Pure and simple invasion of privacy and the courts which have consistantly eroded the Constitution are responsible!
To: freeeee; TightSqueeze; Thinkin' Gal; Jeremiah Jr; Prodigal Daughter; ex-Texan; Fred Mertz; ...
>Outragous. Intolerable. Rediculous. Abusive. I live near there. And I'm not pulling over for this BS.You might not have a choice.
Prophetic vision of Bob Neumann. Click here ---> 38
116
posted on
07/23/2002 6:45:16 PM PDT
by
2sheep
To: TightSqueeze
They call it a ``Voluntary Roadside Interview.''
I am sure that's the first thing to cross their minds as a cop waives them to the side of the road.
117
posted on
07/23/2002 6:47:26 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: TightSqueeze
Are they stupid, and tipped their hand about their potential range of statutory powers above the law or do they think people are so stupid as to not get the implications? Or do they figure that things are to the point where it doesn't matter what people think; they can't do anything about it using the judiciary.
To: WindMinstrel
It may be legal, but it can be made illegal. Do we know anyone in the governor's office, someone like shrub?
To: RightWhale
If you are on public land you have only the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights and a few assorted human and civil rights statutes. You are on public land by permission whether tacit or explicit. That includes paved and painted public road rights-of-way. Au contraire:
Article [IX.]
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Article [X.]
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
120
posted on
07/23/2002 7:04:07 PM PDT
by
gitmo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-137 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson