Skip to comments.
But Officer, I Didn't Do Anything!
Tampa Tribune ^
| Jul 22, 2002
| JIM SLOAN
Posted on 07/23/2002 9:26:02 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-137 last
To: TightSqueeze
Mag ich Ihre Papiere sehen gefalle?..., was die Natur Ihres buisness im Wandhandelszentrum ist?
May i see your papers please ?...what is the nature of your buisness in wall mart?
To: FryingPan101
You would be the decent American to whom you refer? I am not at all sure your family should be any part of the armed forces. You would fit all too easily into the informer mode, denouncing anyone for just looking at you cross-eyed.
You: "Oh, OFFICER, see that woman there? I am SURE she's up to SOMETHING. Could you investigate her please?"
Federal Officer: "Why, sure, Mizz Frying Pan. What tipped you off?"
You: "Well, it was that surly look she cast at me as I cut her off in traffic. She MUST be up to something!"
BTW, my 81-year old mother doesn't care if I use MY computer! Neener, neener, neener.
122
posted on
07/23/2002 7:44:36 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: freeeee
Outragous. Intolerable. Rediculous. Abusive. I live near there. And I'm not pulling over for this BS.
Two men are driving through Texas when they
get pulled over by a Texas Ranger.
The cop walks up and taps on the window with his nightstick.
The driver rolls down the window and WHACK,
the cop smacks him in the head with the stick.
The driver asks, "What the hell was that for?"
The cop answers, "You're in Texas son. When we pull you over,
you better have your license ready when we get to your car."
The driver says, "I'm sorry, Officer, I'm not from around here."
The cop runs a check on the guy's license, and he's clean.
He gives the guy his license back, walks around to the passenger side
and taps on the window.
The passenger rolls down the window and WHACK,
the cop smacks him on the head with the nightstick.
The passenger asks, "What'd you do that for?"
The cop says, "Just making your wish come true."
The passenger asks, "Making what wish come true?"
The cop says, "I know that two miles down the road you're gonna say to
your buddy, 'I wish that asshole would've tried that shit with me!'"
123
posted on
07/23/2002 7:49:44 PM PDT
by
varon
To: TightSqueeze
"Why was I stopped."
"Am I under arrest?"
"See ya."
To: NMFXSTC
In Houston, Texas, I was driving to work in Sugar Land (Fluor) at rather early hour in the morning -mostly to run some computer database when the network was not loaded down. Some beater car pulled up behind me with some sad excuse for wig-wags (alternate flashing headlights, the timing looked like the bozo was working some switches). The vehicle looked like nothing in the regular HPD inventory. I did not pull over for the vehicle. I found out later that the bozo was not HPD, and I was correct not to pull over for such a vehicle. The it is also correct to pull over into a public place, such as a gas station or a convenience store, a legit police officer might not like it at first.
Of course Houston had a problem for a few years of home invaders posing as police officers, FBI, or DEA agents, with sometimes rather convincing looking phony uniforms (especially when they're rushing the house)
To: gitmo
That doesn't get it. It doesn't say who the owner might be, and it sure isn't any Joe who happens to stray onto the land. The battle is practically lost, and has probably been lost since the Mining Law of 1872. See United States vs Gratiot and United States vs Gear. That is subsurface estate although surface estate have a similar history in the sense of ownership. Note also that rights do not imply ownership although vice versa might be true.
To: TightSqueeze
Do you think it is right for them to be in uniform and driving their Police Cruisers if they are off-duty and in fact moonlighting?
NO.
If they are truly off-duty, should they be charged as civilians impersonating an officer?
I think a policy change by the police chief, not a criminal case is in order. I recommend administrative discipline for those that fail to comply, which may ultimately include firing.
Clear enough? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
127
posted on
07/24/2002 6:26:21 AM PDT
by
Triple
To: RightWhale
Your 100 does not make a lick of sense.
You think the founding fathers had a major problem with those who did not have the utmost respect for authority?
PSSSST - These were the same people who wrote the 'Declaration of Independence'.
128
posted on
07/24/2002 6:34:51 AM PDT
by
Triple
To: Triple
The 8th Commandment, the 4th Amendment, the 5th Amendment. That's it. That's the legal basis of all property rights, and it's not explicit.
ius and
dominium are the names of the game. Since the Christians tossed the Law of Moses, that leaves just the 4th and 5th Amendments. There is precedent in Roman law and English Common law, but it is the body of law, that is, case-law that has defined the situation we are now in.
As to rights, they are not granted but acknowledged, and only after they are asserted. So go ahead and assert your rights, no one will do it for you. Then you find out whether the state will acknowledge your rights. Seems like the state is not in a mood to acknowledge at this time; and maybe never will be again. The momentum is going the other way.
To: RightWhale
PoliceState
130
posted on
07/24/2002 11:00:39 AM PDT
by
USA21
To: TightSqueeze
``With the cooperation of state troopers, the state is allowed to pull people over just to seek information.'' Yeah, but are folks legally required to render that info?
131
posted on
07/24/2002 11:10:31 AM PDT
by
maxwell
To: RightWhale
The government can order you off the street at any time because they own it and you don't.
Thus with that power do they not also own you?
132
posted on
07/24/2002 2:29:26 PM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
To: CJ Wolf
do they not also own you? No doubt some people associated with government think so. They talk and act like they do.
To: RightWhale
In other words, the people of the government, by the government and for the government?
134
posted on
07/24/2002 4:23:45 PM PDT
by
gitmo
To: gitmo
Do you think it's headed there, or is it there already?
To: FryingPan101
If it was a random search, I would have felt better.God, you are one scary human being.
To: freeeee
If I'm seeing this correctly, that "off-duty" officer is carrying his sidearm openly. Is that legal for them to do that off-duty? I always thought that when they're off-duty, it had to be concealed.
Chapter 790 of Florida Statutes doesn't make that clear. Does anyone here know?
137
posted on
07/24/2002 5:48:13 PM PDT
by
adx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-137 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson