...Mars flag.
Posted on 07/25/2002 10:13:58 AM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Fellow Freepers: I was recently asked to address a technology group at a State University.
This was my speech.
My speech is about this country, why we need a clear cut goal and what that goal should be.
As a country we seem to be like the wife of an abusive husband waiting for her next beating.
On top of it we have lost our technological edge. It was recently widely reported that the United States lost the title of the fastest computer to Japan.
Financially times are uncertain as well, everyone seems to be scared of losing their jobs. People realize that job security doesn’t exist today as it did, when 30 years of working for a company brought one a gold watch and a healthy retirement check.
Just as at home our rest seems less restful, our enemies seem less clearly defined than they did in the days of the cold war.
What is it that we are lacking?
Well as you should have guessed from my opening, what we lack is a clear cut goal, which harnesses our creative intelligence as a nation.
What should our national goal be?
Well, I don’t think that survival is a worthy goal, as it seems to be what our current goal is and it is not helping us.
And staying the worlds top super power, that involves struggling to stay king of the hill and thus constant turmoil.
In looking for this national goal I am going to suggest a goal that in our past that propelled us forwards.
In the modified words of John Fitzgerald Kennedy: “I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out of landing a man on Mars and returning him to Earth safely.
Before you dismiss this goal, let me explain how this goal would address of the problems I mentioned earlier.
First of all, it is apparent that a strong American space program is the same thing as a strong America.
The military spin offs of space exploration are almost limitless.
Don’t forget that military technology proliferates.
If we rest on our laurels, our enemies will develop nuclear technology and missile delivery systems.
And the lesson of 9-11 is that our enemies are not resting on their laurels.
The driving force of the American economy is technological innovation. Many economists accurately said that the economy of the nineties was flat but the tech sector was so strong that it pulled the rest of the economy with it.
How did America become the world’s leading technical innovator?
I would argue that much of the impetus came as long term spin off from the Apollo space programs and Reagan’s Star Wars initiative.
In addition to technology, many breakthroughs in the fields of engineering, medicine, plastics, aviation, and electronics came from these programs.
The problem currently is that corporations owe it to their shareholders to return profits in the current quarter. This stifles long-term research and investment.
And since winning an election has become so expensive, politicians are more concerned about filling their campaign coffers than the long-term well being of this country.
The investment in high tech research and manufacturing necessary to put a man on Mars would be a tremendous boast to the economy and have spin off effects for decades.
It would also help the increasing unemployment. Not only would it have these advantages, but this new found space agility would benefit the entire world in other ways. How many of you remember the asteroids hitting Jupiter a couple of years ago.
And often times in the news it is noted that an asteroid narrowly missed us. As it currently is, we have absolutely no defense against this.
To develop the capacity to defend against this eventuality would also help us with missile defense. And both of these programs would benefit from a manned mission to Mars.
And although many would decry this as a budget boondoggle, I would say that it would force the government to redefine it’s priorities and make it more efficient. It would have to be more efficient and channel the nations resources more carefully.
In conclusion, fellow Freepers, I ask you to remember the exhilaration of watching Neil Armstrong taking one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.
And join me in supporting the growing movement onward and upward into space.
That's ironic--in outer space, room equals freedom. What about here on Earth?
LOL.
Whenever I suggest America stop immigration because the crowding is taking away our freedom, there's always some poster out there that quotes Limbaugh's howler about how the entire population of planet earth can fit in Texas with room to spare.
Freedom is vast green areas, clean bodies of water and fresh air from blue skies--not blackness and an oxygen mask and the slavery needed to maintain a glass bubble over your neighborhood (it's bad enough when your neighbors make you mow your lawn--I sure don't like the idea of doing windows in some monstrous geodesic domed space greenhouse).
Instead of colonizing Mars, it's better to simply stop immigration.
Then we'd have plenty of room here in America.
...Mars flag.
well duh...If you wish to travel to Mars you have to use space travel. How else you gonna get there, teleportation?
35mm Kodachrome will beat the snot out of 70mm anythingelsechrome (or anythingelsecolor).
Since it's a reversal film, it will need to have an internegative made so that large numbers of prints can be distributed, but a 70mm (or 90mm) internegative generation would probably be capable of capturing most of what the Kodachrome original had captured.
Or, the original reversal film can be scanned, and then prints (of any desired format) printed via a digital-to-film printer directly onto the release print film.
Of course, this is all moot, as none of it will ever happen.
35mm Kodachrome will beat the snot out of 70mm anythingelsechrome (or anythingelsecolor).
Hmmm. 8+ months for the film to return to earth, plus three weeks for developing...how about some nice E-6? Better color saturation anyway ;)
Seems I remember from my history lessons that Isabella sold her personal jewelry to pay for the trip. The money didn't come from public funds.
If every federal elected official, executive branch appointee and federal judge dug deep and coughed up $500,000 each, we could go back to the moon.
If you threw it open to citizens to donate money too, you could probably fund the Mars mission.
And if the private sector was given the money instead of letting NASA blow it, we could probably go to Mars for about a billion dollars.
And all without extorting money from the public.
Extort: Latin : to obtain from a person by force or threat of force. See: income tax
Mars my butt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.