let me know, please, if you'd like on or off of my ping list!
Posted on 07/26/2002 11:00:47 AM PDT by aristeides
I know about Bodansky and his pro-Serbian and anti-islamist views, and his warnings about islamofascist infiltration of our country. I also know that many who don't like Bodansky's views have accused him alternatively of being an Israeli Mossad agent and a Serbian agent working for Milosevic. But I don't know about these Congressmen.
I was mainly--and sarcastically--referring to those Freepers who used to accuse yours truly of being a "Serb propagandist hatemonger from Milosevic's disinformation ministry in Belgrade", or some similar tommyrot.
Unfortunately, muslim subversives and fifth columnists are not the creation of any propagandist--Serbian, Russian, Indian, Israeli, or Republican--but are all too real, and are worse than any propaganist could imagine. On the other side of things, the Serbs are mainly good and Christian people, who were merely defending themselves, their ancestral land, and their faith and culture from the New World Order and muslim onslaught. The REAL disinformation is the false picture of the "evil Serb" and of the "innocent, multicultural 'moderate' muslims" who were supposed to be the leaders of muslim "Bosnia" and Albanian Kosovo.
let me know, please, if you'd like on or off of my ping list!
Disturbing trend. When I was in the service (late 60s), non-citizen soldiers were few and far between.
IIRC, Rome fell largely because its army was composed almost entirely of non-citizens. Its citizens were too wussified to serve themselves and its non-citizen soldiers had nothing invested in the society and weren't about to die defending it. Of course, it's much worse if the enemy is actually infiltrating the army.
Multicultural RAT-ism is to blame for this. Damn them.
On the other hand, if there are any noncitizen traitors serving on active duty, that order would have given them citizenship.
I believe you're correct. It would apply if he was called up to active duty.
And there will be plenty of that soon, when we go into Iraq.
What makes you say that?
I worry.
In certain Army M.O.S. it can give him access to secrets just for being a grunt. {Such as Ammo handler, gun crew ect.} Navy wise most Navy Aviation Bosuns Mates {fuelers} task from what I remember were at best confidential. But he could have befriended quiet a few in more knowing ratings though. I could understand our letting the Phillipines in as we had a long standing alliance with them up till recently or post Marcos. Basically we ran the nation and had sufficent means to do back ground checks. But why in the world are we letting persons from other nations in? I think it's time to make our enlistees who are not U.S. natural citizens subject to a very extensive back ground check. And what about this guys age to rank ratio? It's not adding up.
I noticed that as well. First thought was we must be scraping bottom. But last I knew the cutoff age was 35.
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
By the way, I've been reading a book about the settlement of Tories in Canada after the American Revolution. Some of those settled initially in New Brunswick were American blacks who had fought on the British side. Shortly after their settlement in New Brunswick, a lot of them were resettled in Sierra Leone, I take it because they found the Canadian climate hard to take.
That all depends on what Naval Investigations and the federal agencies find out. But there is plenty for an Arty 32.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.