Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin's tobacco-settlement payments will use ALL of the money for this years budget!~whew
Duluth News Tribune ^ | July 27, 2002 | JENNY PRICE

Posted on 07/28/2002 8:59:57 AM PDT by SheLion

MADISON - Gov. Scott McCallum signed a bill Friday that will use ALL of the money from the sale of Wisconsin's tobacco-settlement payments to fix a $1.1 billion budget deficit.

The bill also overhauls Wisconsin's campaign finance laws for the first time in 25 years and makes across-the-board cuts to state government agencies, while preserving aid to local governments this year.

The measure McCallum signed makes adjustments to the budget for the two-year period that ends June 30, 2003. The budget was thrown out of balance by an economic slump and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The Legislature was called back into session to take up the budget-adjustment bill because the state constitution requires the budget to be balanced.

"We solved our most pressing problem without raising taxes," McCallum said after signing the bill in his Capitol office.

But the legislation won't solve all of Wisconsin's budget problems.

The state is projected to have a $2.8 billion deficit for the 2003-05 budget because its spending commitments -- including two-thirds of the cost of public education -- will exceed its expected revenue.

The bill makes no cuts to local government aid in the current two-year budget. It calls for a $40 million reduction in 2004 to the more than $1 billion that counties, cities, towns and villages use each year to pay for services such as garbage pickup and police and fire protection.

The cut is minor compared with the governor's proposal to eliminate that aid entirely within two years.

"We've come a long way from the prospect of losing shared revenue," said Doug Finn, Douglas County Board chairman.

But he's only cautiously optimistic at this point because shared revenue could end up back on the table when the Legislature begins addressing a projected $1.3 billion budget deficit next year.

As long as the state honors its commitment through 2003, the county will be OK for now, Finn said. By waiting until 2004 to make cuts in shared revenue, it provides the county with time to plan for expected cuts, he said.

In 2004, Douglas County is expected to lose $200,469 of the $2.9 million in shared revenue it receives.

Knowing Superior could have lost $9 million in shared revenue if the Legislature had accepted Gov. Scott McCallum's initial proposal to end shared revenue by 2004, Mayor Sharon Kotter said, she was "absolutely" relieved to hear the latest news.

While the city is expected to lose $125,920 of its $9 million in shared revenue in 2004, officials had been worried about what could happen if the governor vetoed the Legislature's proposals on shared revenue.

The city doesn't receive its shared-revenue payment until November, but because the money was budgeted it was spent, Kotter said.

"If something happened -- we were worried we may not get it," Kotter said. "We are already looking at next year's budget and have to make cuts." She said she was a little apprehensive for a while, knowing McCallum could veto the Legislature's proposed reforms for shared revenue.

"We're happy to hear he left shared revenue alone and left in the incentive for shared services."

Sen. Bob Jauch, D-Poplar, was unavailable for comment Friday afternoon.

The bill also sets aside $45 million from the aid to reward local governments that save money by consolidating services.

The measure uses an additional $825 million generated from the state's sale of 25-years-worth of payments Wisconsin was scheduled to receive under a settlement with tobacco companies to fill the deficit.

The state already had planned to use $450 million from the sale to balance its books. The bill uses the rest of the money from the almost $1.3 billion it made off the sale this spring to fill the deficit.

McCallum has the power to veto any part of the revised budget bill.

He decided to keep intact a campaign finance-reform package, though none of the changes will affect this year's election.

The reforms include a new 30-day window before elections in which independent groups must report to the state if they are going to run ads advocating the support or defeat of a candidate. They also have to report how much they plan to spend on the ads.

The bill creates a public financing system for candidates, paid for through a $20 checkoff on tax returns.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Culture/Society; Government; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: antismokers; butts; cigarettes; individualliberty; money; niconazis; prohibitionists; pufflist; settlement; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco

YEA! SPEND IT LIKE THERE IS NO TOMORROW.

1 posted on 07/28/2002 8:59:58 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; red-dawg; ...
Pitiful.

What will they do in the years to come? Raise cigarette taxes AGAIN?!

2 posted on 07/28/2002 9:01:18 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Who's calling the shots on spending the shared revenues and how does the game work?

What is McCallum's ultimate goal and how does it compare against what was big government's objective with this program? How do the two measure up in the end?

3 posted on 07/28/2002 9:47:08 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
What will they do in the years to come? Raise cigarette taxes AGAIN?!

Why, sue the crap out of the tobacco companies again.

Worked before.

4 posted on 07/28/2002 9:53:57 AM PDT by woofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
"What will they do in the years to come? Raise cigarette taxes AGAIN?!"

No, sue McDonald's!

5 posted on 07/28/2002 9:58:09 AM PDT by Boss_Jim_Gettys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
"...will use ALL of the money from the sale of Wisconsin's tobacco-settlement payments."

They did the same thing in Missouri - but they still have items in the upcoming election to raise taxes. In Missouri, legislators traded $1 billion in long-term tobacco settlement revenues for $530 million in near term borrowing -- surely one of the most irresponsible moves in state history.

They have billion coming to them in future payments, but they piss half of it away so they can spend it now.

These people are totally reckless and shortsighted. We are governed by IDIOTS.

Remeinds me of an old quote, can't remember who said it...
"Giving money and power to politicians is like giving a teenage boy your car keys and a bottle of whisky"

6 posted on 07/28/2002 11:01:25 AM PDT by kcpopps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Well, SheLion, one good thing comes from this idiocy: The Anti Cartel gets shut out of some of the money they use to vilify smokers.
7 posted on 07/28/2002 11:52:57 AM PDT by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
They sound so darn proud of themselves, the smug idiots.
8 posted on 07/28/2002 5:43:46 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
Smug, that is an understatement for all the self-righteous idiots who stole the money from its citizens because they don't know how to budget. There was no skills involved but treachery. They should bow down to every person who buys a pack of cigarettes for getting them out of debt. Instead, they will add even more NO SMOKING signs and still lap up the rewards handed to them by smokers.
9 posted on 07/28/2002 5:48:11 PM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jaidyn
BUMP - for the morning.

You've got a GREAT POINT!!!

10 posted on 07/28/2002 6:01:47 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
My grammar is outrageous, though! I just get so darned mad at the smoking bandits who deliberately set out to take advantage of smokers because they can get away with it. Every smoker should light up at the same time and make it a point to be in a non-smoking area. When the screaming starts we can inform the yellers that we own everything now! And if this keeps up we will actually own everything or at least everything will be paid for with our cigarette taxes. Why don't they go after those who spread AIDS instead of giving our money to them? I'd just as soon take my chances with a cigarette as I would a homosexual who looks pale around the gills.
11 posted on 07/28/2002 6:33:59 PM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
They sound so darn proud of themselves, the smug idiots.

Wait a couple years, when they have no MSA money and still can't balance their budget. What will they do THEN? Maine almost took the lump sum, too. Not sure if Gov. King will do it to bail himself out or not. But this money has turned the states into absolute gluttons.

Yet, they say they want "smoke free everything." If it wasn't for the smokers, they wouldn't HAVE this money.

12 posted on 07/28/2002 6:41:28 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
"If something happened -- we were worried we may not get it,"

Hope they're not expecting to get this moolah from the Feds....

13 posted on 07/28/2002 6:41:29 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
So much for the tobacco smoking victims and THEIR families!
14 posted on 07/28/2002 6:46:54 PM PDT by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
So much for the tobacco smoking victims and THEIR families!

What?

15 posted on 07/28/2002 6:48:36 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
#12....... These politicians has to pay the piper sometime.
16 posted on 07/28/2002 7:29:13 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The budget was thrown out of balance by an economic slump and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Actually, the budget was thrown out of balance by Chuck Chvala and government spending run amuck, aided by a bunch of brain dead Senate Democrats who never saw a good, mediocre, or stupid idea they didn't like and wouldn't fund, and the do-nothing RINOs who just grab their ankles and raise their butts in the air every budget season.

17 posted on 07/29/2002 7:19:05 AM PDT by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Absolutely! What I find most disgusting is they profess to hate the idea of smokers yet take a bigger cut than the manufacturers get! Next, fat will be taxed, then sugar and so on. What gets my goat is the smoking nazis don't try to tax homosexuals who spread AIDs which is a preventable disease. Instead, they expect us to give billions to them while they kill each other and innocent victims. They are a bigger threat than a pack of Winstons, don't you think?
18 posted on 07/30/2002 5:25:46 PM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson