Skip to comments.
DNA Exonerates Man Jailed in
1984
Associated Press ^
| Sunday, July 28, 2002
| JIM SUHR
Posted on 07/28/2002 9:35:25 AM PDT by Dog Gone
ST. LOUIS (AP) -- Preliminary DNA tests on evidence once believed destroyed has exonerated a man imprisoned in 1984 for raping a college student, a prosecutor said.
Prosecutor Jennifer Joyce said she plans to file court papers to free Larry Johnson, 47, serving a life sentence plus 30 years for rape, sodomy, kidnapping and robbery.
``My heart just goes out to Mr. Johnson,'' said Joyce, who had no role in his conviction. ``Mr. Johnson has been horribly wronged. Absolutely, there is no way I can ever make this up to him.''
Joyce said Friday that the preliminary DNA results have been sent back to the same police crime lab for confirmation, though ``I'm confident the results are not going to change.''
Joyce also plans to ask St. Louis police to reopen the case involving the rape of a 20-year-old Saint Louis University student.
Johnson was in prison and not available for comment. His St. Louis attorney did not immediately return telephone messages.
Joyce said the rape victim, after being told of the DNA results clearing Johnson, was feeling ``a variety of emotions.''
Prosecutors had thought evidence from Johnson's case was destroyed but in February a pipe burst at the Municipal Courts building and workers found bags from Johnson's case that included a rape kit, Joyce said.
The victim had identified Johnson as her attacker and there was other circumstantial evidence that helped convict him, Joyce said.
Barry Scheck, co-founder of the New York-based Innocence Project, had pushed for the DNA tests. He did not immediately return telephone messages Saturday. The decade-old Innocence Project has used DNA testing to free more than 100 inmates nationwide.
A Missouri law, effective since August 2001, lets convicted rapists seek new DNA tests if the technology wasn't available at the time of their trial.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
I think Larry is entitled to be somewhat bitter.
1
posted on
07/28/2002 9:35:25 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
Joyce said the rape victim, after being told of the DNA results clearing Johnson, was feeling ``a variety of emotions.'' Like, "Oops"?
To: Larry Lucido
Or, "I wonder if Mr. Johnson would like to rearrange my face."
3
posted on
07/28/2002 10:05:05 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
We need laws in every state to allow DNA tests for people convicted using evidence that wasn't originally tested for DNA, but this should only be allowed where this type of evidence was used to convict the person.
4
posted on
07/28/2002 10:21:09 AM PDT
by
umgud
To: Dog Gone
If prosecutors would concern themselves with getting to the truth of the matter instead of padding their conviction rates at the expense of people who can't afford the cost of justice in our justice system they wouldn't have this problem. DNA tests should be a given before every trial of this sort if they aren't already.
5
posted on
07/28/2002 10:24:16 AM PDT
by
GaConfed
To: GaConfed
If prosecutors would concern themselves with getting to the truth of the matter instead of padding their conviction rates at the expense of people who can't afford the cost of justice in our justice system they wouldn't have this problem.I thought this story was ironic, since we just had a long thread complaining about defense attorneys who defend clients whom we believe are guilty.
6
posted on
07/28/2002 10:34:28 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
different sides of the same problem...isn't it?
To: brigette
.
8
posted on
07/28/2002 11:30:44 AM PDT
by
JudyB1938
To: adversarial
different sides of the same problem...isn't it?
No. Both are attacks on a legal justice system which works better than any other. The perceived problem is LAW-YAHS. In truth, lawyers are merely the arbiters of the criminal justice system. When I defend a client, I ALWAYS tell him/her I can only deal with the facts as presented by the sides. I never make them up.
So when someone walks that we are sure is guilty (O.J.) we blame the lawyer. When someone is deemed guilty that is later shown innocent, we blame the lawyer.
I want everyone who takes these positions to sit down and come up with a better system.
Post your replies here.
Thanks
9
posted on
07/28/2002 11:41:30 AM PDT
by
lawdude
To: lawdude
how about a system that honestly seeks to find the truth...
not one that ries to "get their client off" or tries to "get a conviction?
I don't have to invent a new system to see there are problems with the system we have...and alot of those problems are do to lawyers and their dishonest practices of succsessfully defending the guilty and agressivly persuing the innocent.
We have child molesters returned to the streets who kill innocent children, and innocent men locked up for decades, and you try to say there isn't a problem?
To: adversarial
We have child molesters returned to the streets who kill innocent children, and innocent men locked up
for decades, and you try to say there isn't a problem?
I didn't say there wasn't a problem I only stated that most people blame lawyers when there is a verdict with which they do not agree.
Consider the jury pool. And I will say no more about that.
I know lawyers, both defense and prosecution that are less than perfect. Me too, probably, but not unethically. Most attorneys are competent and ethical. It is the few rotten apples that make life miserable for the rest of us. That is true in most professions (except journalism???).
11
posted on
07/28/2002 12:23:45 PM PDT
by
lawdude
To: Dog Gone
The ultimate goal of Prostitutors is becoming Governor or at least face-time on Fox. The position is a political stepping-stone. Truth or justice has nothing to do with it. If a few people spend decades in jail for no good reason, they were just political contributors furthering a good cause.
12
posted on
07/28/2002 12:24:37 PM PDT
by
agitator
To: adversarial
how about a system that honestly seeks to find the truth... BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!
Gad... I needed that... I think I busted an inseam...
13
posted on
07/28/2002 12:27:31 PM PDT
by
maxwell
To: adversarial
how about a system that honestly seeks to find the truth... not one that ries to "get their client off" or tries to "get a conviction? Oh, you mean some sort of government inquisition?
14
posted on
07/28/2002 12:44:34 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: maxwell
Whats so funny about an innocent man locked up for years for something he didn't do?
Or a sick predator let lose on the streets to kill innocent children?
To: Dog Gone
You object to locking up child molestors?
or do you supprt locking up innocent people?
To: adversarial
Whats so funny about an innocent man locked up for years for something he didn't do? Or a sick predator let lose on the streets to kill innocent children? [sigh] It ain't that I find so damn funny, dude/dudette... It's the thought that the legal system in general could be motivated by any sort of good true aspiration. Sure there are some genuinely true-hearted lawyers, I believe that, and I believe in Santa Claus. No seriously, there are some lawyers here on FR, for example, that I'd trust with my life. I guess I have a more cynical (realistic?) view of the heart of mankind.
17
posted on
07/28/2002 4:02:17 PM PDT
by
maxwell
To: Dog Gone
A man gets off on a technicality after nearly twenty years. When will Congress do something to limit appeals by criminals?
18
posted on
07/28/2002 4:22:38 PM PDT
by
Doe Eyes
To: maxwell
(sigh) your cynical acceptance of injustice dosn't speak well of you, if it was your daughter murdered, or if it was you unjustly inprisoned you would be singing a different tune DUDE
To: umgud
but this should only be allowed where this type of evidence was used to convict the person Why? If there is DNA evidence which exonerates someone convicted of the crime, why would it matter if the evidence were used in his first trial? In this case, the point is that DNA technology was not availble for the original trial.
20
posted on
07/28/2002 5:10:08 PM PDT
by
LouD
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson