Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assignment America: Smoke screens/One of the best articles I have read!
United Press International ^ | 22 August 2002 | John Bloom

Posted on 08/23/2002 5:39:18 PM PDT by SheLion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 361-368 next last
To: Burlem
Furthrmore they want to increase the tax $3.00 a pack.(have to help the deficit you know), with the logic of the libs, we stop kids from smoking, we raise the taxes per pack so that we can put that money in the general fund then we can have more programs, gee, wonder what would happen if the cigarettes sales took a downward trend, wonder what they would tax next?, don't say booze they decided against that.

Burlem, that attempt to increase the tax on cigarettes is not dead, it's sitting in committee, and I expect it will be rammed through toward the end of next week, prbably minutes before the legislative session ends. That will make the price of cigarettes in Kookiefornia equivalent to NYC. Never fear, though, Robber Reiner has already been to Washington and made a deal to get FEDERAL FUNDING for his $700 million a year programs if the taxes on tobacco products fall. I'm absolutely amazed that Americans are putting up with this crap.

BTW, time for another lecture to ANYONE who still pays into the Smoker Shakedown...SMOKE CHEAP, IT'S YOUR CIVIC DUTY!! Buy online, buy from the reservations, or make your own additive-free, virtually tax-free cigarettes for less than $8 a CARTON in about an hour.

JUST DO IT!

261 posted on 08/24/2002 12:49:20 PM PDT by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: mercy
Also mythical are almost all claims linking diet and health.

Well that's quite a statement. Could you give us some details. I really want to know. I promise not to flame you.

Thanks for the promise! I certainly hope I would catch myself before ever flaming anyone with mercy's screen (or real) name.

I agree that it is a sweeping statement. There are thousands of turgid articles in epidemiology and related medical journals making such claims, and no one person can examine them all. But most are pitifully weak from a scientific proof standpoint.

I strongly recommend the book "The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine" by James Le Fanu. The first half of the book, on the rise of modern medicine, is consistently facinating, and the ending section, on the fall of most medical research into near irrelevance, tackles this issue far better than I could ever attempt to.

A good internet link (but not as good as that book) is:

Junk Science

262 posted on 08/24/2002 12:55:08 PM PDT by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: mercy
The link I post immediately, or almost immediately, above, was bad. Many here are probably already aware of the Junk Science site. But if not, try this:

JunkScience

263 posted on 08/24/2002 1:06:27 PM PDT by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
Actually it is part of the tax increases in the budget that the Repubs. (all 4 of them) are holding up., the other tax increases:5% on your satellite dish, 3.5% sales tax on your house, DMV will be doubled next year. There are NO spending cuts.
264 posted on 08/24/2002 1:28:47 PM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
"And the killer irony is that many firefighters smoke. We would joke after a job when we were back at the station cleaning the gear (and they were smoking) that the products of combustion from most fires are not as lethal as cigarette smoke.

As you well know, smoke from fires, as opposed to hot gas, or the fire itself, accounts for a large amount of fire fatalities. No one ever died from cigarette smoke. Although it has been a couple of years since I reviewed the literature on second hand smoke. The cruel experiments would pipe the equivalent of the smoke of thousands of cigarettes a day, for months into rats, and I believe, dogs lungs via intubation. Nada. Nothing. The researchers wanted to get a graph of respiratory cancers rates in relation to side stream cig smoke. For example, more cigs, more cancer, less cigs less cancer. Even with rodents especially breed to get cancer, no one has been able to induce it under any circumstances. Hence the honest statement that there is no safe level of second hand smoke. There is also no unsafe level either, since no cancers could be manufactured under any circumstances.

Lastly, everything is toxic and fatal, to include water and oxygen. It is just a matter of dose. It isn't the substances that makes the poison, it is the amount.

One other thing, what is this "civilian" bit. What are you in the Marine Corps? If you are not in the military, you're a civilian. And don't give me that "I'm in a paramilitary organization." That is like para-pregant. Yachts clubs have legal characters and have captains and admirals, never the less they’re still like everyone else, citizens.

265 posted on 08/24/2002 2:04:59 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
"One other thing, what is this "civilian" bit. What are you in the Marine Corps? "

Not in the Marines yet, hopefully I will be come January.

By civilian I think they are not including the deaths of firefighters who respond to the fatal fires. NFPA's terminology - not mine - take up your gripe with them.

http://www.nfpa.org/Research/OneStopDataShop/OneStopDataShop.asp#leading - and click on "See more information about the leading causes of fires "

Enjoy the following on second hand smoke - which has a lot of bad stuff in it that I do not want to be exposed to. I am off to run 10 miles. See ya!

http://www.repace.com/fact_exp.html
Secondhand Smoke Exposure
SHS is a complex mixture of gas and particle-phase chemicals generated during the burning and smoking of tobacco products (CalEPA, 1997). Chemicals present in SHS include irritants and systemic toxicants such as hydrogen cyanide and sulfur dioxide, mutagens and carcinogens such as benzo(a)pyrene, formaldehyde and 4-aminobiphenyl, and reproductive toxicants such as nicotine, cadmium, and carbon monoxide (CalEPA, 1997). Many SHS constituents have been identified as hazardous by state, federal, and international agencies. To date, over 50 compounds in tobacco smoke have been identified as carcinogens and six as developmental or reproductive toxicants by the State of California. Table 2 shows 43 known or suspected carcinogens in tobacco smoke identified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 1987).

266 posted on 08/24/2002 2:21:40 PM PDT by pittsburgh gop guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Please add me to your ping list. Thanks!
267 posted on 08/24/2002 3:05:48 PM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
CalEPA has health warning on bags of washed playbox sand. That should give you an idea of how wacky they are. But health nazis being unfit, and scared, and sickly to work in a real job have to work somewhere.

Well, let say on your run you don't encounter any 2ndSmoke. I will say that will have breathed in 10 or more thousands of known cancerous compounds.

And especially, if you want to avoid cellular mutagenic chemicals, do not eat vegetables. They are a trove of toxins.

Seriously, don't make physically contact with any person or any mammals. Each and every day, more and more virus are being discovered as the cause of cancer. Adding H. pylori, that make bacteria cancer causing.

Oh, and barbecues and their smoke are aromatic hydrocarbons. This includes the charred bits on the meat, and would included any roasted, fried, baked meats. Baked, fried, toasted wheat products. And while your in the Corps, bobbing around in a Navy ship, please tell the Gunny that they paints, oil, fluids and solvents are right then and there, which they will, assaulting your mitochondria. This will also include the chlorine bath the salt air will give you. Well, I could go on.

268 posted on 08/24/2002 3:07:20 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
I was in a hurry. You know what I meant.
269 posted on 08/24/2002 3:27:42 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity; *all


270 posted on 08/24/2002 3:32:13 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Secondhand Smoke Exposure
SHS is a complex mixture of gas and particle-phase chemicals generated during the burning and smoking of tobacco products (CalEPA, 1997). Chemicals present in SHS include irritants and systemic toxicants such as hydrogen cyanide and sulfur dioxide, mutagens and carcinogens such as benzo(a)pyrene, formaldehyde and 4-aminobiphenyl, and reproductive toxicants such as nicotine, cadmium, and carbon monoxide (CalEPA, 1997). Many SHS constituents have been identified as hazardous by state, federal, and international agencies. To date, over 50 compounds in tobacco smoke have been identified as carcinogens and six as developmental or reproductive toxicants by the State of California. Table 2 shows 43 known or suspected carcinogens in tobacco smoke identified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 1987).

Oh for heaven's sake. Where did you get that garbage.

Here's a op-ed I wrote for the paper awhile back:

Don’t swallow that food while you’re dining out

In response to the letter by Paul L. Perito, chairman and president, Star Scientific Inc: Cigarettes and cigarette smoke contain a multitude of toxic chemicals, according to anti-smoking zealots. Therefore, the public must be protected from evil smokers who would threaten the health of nonsmoking men, women and children in places like restaurants and bars.

But what exactly are those helpless victims eating and drinking in their smoke-free, toxic-free non-smoking section of the restaurant? You might be surprised. Holding your breath while you eat might protect you from toxic secondhand smoke, but don’t swallow that food!

Everybody likes roast turkey, especially when the whole family is around the table. Hope they like heterocyclic amines, too. Nothing goes better with turkey than some bread stuffing ethyl alcohol, benzo(a)pyrene, ethyl carbamate, furan derivatives, furfural, dihydrazines, d-limonene, psoralens, quercetin glycosides and safrole. Nothing says “Happy Holidays” like cranberry sauce, unless it’s the furan derivatives that go with it.

How about some prime rib of beef with parsley sauce? Use lots of ketchup unless you have a taste for heterocyclic amines and psoralens. How about some broccoli spears? The allyl isothiocyanate ought to kill the taste. Who doesn’t like a nice baked potato? Can’t have too much ethyl alcohol and caffeic acid, I suppose. Perhaps you prefer a sweet potato instead. You’ll still get your dose of ethyl alcohol, but with a shot of furfural to boot. No meal is complete without rolls and butter. Or the ethyl alcohol, benzo(a)pyrene, ethyl carbamate, furan derivatives and furfural that come with it.

Save room for dessert pumpkin pie is good, even with the benzo(a)pyrene, coumarin and safrole inside. Apple pie is my favorite, though I’d rather not think about the acetaldehyde, caffeic acid, coumarin, estragole, ethyl alcohol, quercetin glycoside and safrole that go with it. Fresh apples, pears, grapes or mangos? They’re always good, even with the acetaldehyde, benzaldehyde, caffeic acid, d-limonene, estragole and quercetin glycosides. Anybody else need a drink after all that?

If you drink enough red wine, you won’t notice the ethyl alcohol and ethyl carbamate. If you drink so much that it’s time for a cup of coffee, the benzo(a)pyrene, benzaldehyde, benzene, benzofuran, caffeic acid, catechol, 1,2,5,6-dibenz(a)anthracene, d-limonene, ethyl benzene, furan, furfural, hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinone might do you some good. Or not. If tea is more to your liking, you might need some sugar to mask the taste of the benzo(a)pyrene and quercetin glycosides.

And for you health-conscious types who prefer only herbal teas, have some symphytine with your comfrey tea. Or some benzyl acetate with your jasmine tea. A cigarette might taste good after all that.

271 posted on 08/24/2002 3:40:28 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Oh for heaven's sake. Where did you get that garbage?

(That's my response to your response!) And I listed my source. Just because you don't like the findings that second hand smoke contains bad stuff does not make the scientific findings "garbage."

As for your op-ed, even if true, it is irrelevant. Why? Because what I eat, I eat. It does nothing to you if I eat all of the things you describe. UNLIKE second hand smoke, which you create and those around you inhale. I really don't care about the health of smokers - if they are foolish enough to smoke, let them. But don't expose me to the by-products of it. And likewise, I don't care if you don't believe that smoking is unhealthy, I do, so don't expose me to it. Why should I suffer for your behavior? Just like being gay - it's behavior that you guys are engaging in that is bad, and you want society to condone.

Oh - 10 mile run went well. Negative split on a 5 mile course. Averaged 7:40 a mile. Guess all that non-smoking is really hurting me.
272 posted on 08/24/2002 5:03:02 PM PDT by pittsburgh gop guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
PUUULEEEEZE! Not REPACE!!! ANYONE BUT REPACE!!!!

gop guy, Repace is a certifiable lunatic. I know, I know, he bills himself as the "world's leading expert on secondhand smoke," and he used to work for the EPA, but that's only part of the Repace story.

When he worked for the EPA, even though the entire agency was smokefree, he claimed there were "toxins" in the air that made him sick. He demanded, and got, permission to work at home. On occasion, though, he was required to come into EPA headquarters for meetings, etc., and he wore a GAS MASK. He also sued EPA for those imaginary toxins causing his illnesses--which it turns out were all in his head. He lost.

This is the guy who says with a straight face that it would take winds of 300 mph to clear smoke from a room. At one meeting I attended, he upped that figure to 700 mph!! Just saw a special on Hurricane Andrew, one of the 3 worst hurricanes ever experienced here in the US, and the strongest gusts recorded were right at 200 mph. Repace also believes molecules of tobacco smoke hang around and jump out and attack those who enter the room where people have smoked in the past month or even longer. Will you PLEASE use your common sense??? Please?

FYI, the paragraph you quote uses the CalEPA report for its justification. The CalEPA report was based almost exclusively on the US EPA report which was a total farce and has been invalidated by a federal judge. It's also deceptive.

OSHA says the amount of toxins found in shs seldom if ever reach the necessary level to be considered dangerous. Toxicologists have proven that it would take THOUSANDS of cigarettes burning simultaneously in an UNVENTILATED room to reach permissible levels of ALL those things he mentions. The dose makes the poison. That's why the arsenic in your drinking water or the salt on your food won't kill you.

You have been bamboozled, dude, by a well-funded, very slick bunch of snake oil pitchmen and you've swallowed it whole. It's fine if you don't want to be "exposed to" environmental tobacco smoke and there's no reason in this day and age you ever should be. Just stay out of smoker-friendly places and you need never smell tobacco smoke. Just realize that it's not because it will harm you, it's because you don't like it.

273 posted on 08/24/2002 7:08:17 PM PDT by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
"OSHA says the amount of toxins found in shs seldom if ever reach the necessary level to be considered dangerous."

Shouldn't you be attacking OSHA now too? And look again what you wrote: "...seldom if ever reach the necessary level to be considered dangerous" - that means it is within the realm of possibility. I would be interested in exactly what their reports say. And if you are ceding that OSHA has some credibility - then you are buying that shs is bad - even if it is just "seldom if ever". So please make some sense and show consistency. I say that it is possible that shs is harmful and do not want to be exposed to it. After mentioning the OSHA report you then refuse to acknowledge the possibility that shs is harmful. ?

"You have been bamboozled, dude, by a well-funded, very slick bunch of snake oil pitchmen and you've swallowed it whole."

Ah - far more appropriate in describing you suckers who started smoking and keep smoking because the billions spent on advertising by Big Tobacco:
"The industry spent $9.5 billion on advertising and promotions in 2000, the last year for which such figures were available. The total was 16 percent greater than the previous year." - http://www.med.sc.edu:1081/tobaccoadchanges.htm

who are the well-funded slick bunch that are anti-smoking? And I am sure that their ad budget is a fraction of $9.5 billion? And thanks to the settlement, much of their $$$ now comes from cig sales.
274 posted on 08/24/2002 7:35:35 PM PDT by pittsburgh gop guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
I am off to run 10 miles. See ya!

Oh dear, watch out for those car fumes, they will kill you.

275 posted on 08/24/2002 8:32:20 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Your not one of mine, are you?

No, but I'm sure there were times when my mother wouldn't have argued if you'd tried to claim me :)

276 posted on 08/24/2002 9:48:20 PM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
No, but I'm sure there were times when my mother wouldn't have argued if you'd tried to claim me :)


277 posted on 08/25/2002 7:03:39 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
Just like being gay - it's behavior that you guys are engaging in that is bad, and you want society to condone.

Listen Mr. Smug. There is not a gay bone in my body and I resent the reference that you think I am! Or you think any of us in here are.

Most gays cannot smoke, because of their immune system being so worn out. You seem to want to lump smokers in with all the ills of the earth. Well, I beg to differ with you. We are not the demons you would like us to be.

278 posted on 08/25/2002 7:08:15 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy

And thanks to the settlement, much of their $$$ now comes from cig sales.

See how little you really do know?  The MSA or Tobacco Settlement Money is paid 100% by the smokers who pay taxes on cigarettes.  Big Tobacco does not pay one penny.  The Government is paying not one penny.  It all comes from the taxes that are imposed on the smokers.


279 posted on 08/25/2002 7:58:43 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
Just like being gay - it's behavior that you guys are engaging i n that is bad, and you want society to condone.

ah - far more appropriate in describing you suckers who started smoking and keep smoking because the billions spent on advertising by Big Tobacco:

He is just a basher, Max.  Might be good for debating, but I can't see any blinders coming off.

280 posted on 08/25/2002 8:06:44 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 361-368 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson