Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Louisiana) SUPREME COURT THROWS OUT MINIMUM WAGE ORDINANCE
WWL ^ | 9-4-02

Posted on 09/04/2002 11:06:39 AM PDT by mikenola

SUPREME COURT THROWS OUT MINIMUM WAGE ORDINANCE

(New Orleans-AP) The Louisiana Supreme Court has effectively killed a minimum wage in the city of New Orleans that was a dollar-an-hour higher than the federal minimum.

In a 6-to-1 ruling, the high court upheld the constitutionality of a state law banning local governments from imposing minimum wages higher than those set by Congress. The city minimum wage would have set the current hourly minimum in New Orleans at six-dollars-and-15 cents, instead of the federal five-dollars-and-15 cents.

Proponents say the higher wage is desperately needed by a work force that often is trapped in low-paying service jobs. Opponents said the higher minimum would have put the city at a disadvantage in attracting new employers.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: minimumwage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/04/2002 11:06:39 AM PDT by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Good. Common sense prevails.
2 posted on 09/04/2002 11:11:35 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The "Kingfish" must be rolling in his grave.
3 posted on 09/04/2002 11:13:20 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Get rid of min. wage all together. Wages will increase a lot. Sure, you'll have a few penny pinchers who'll want to pay next to nothing, but they will end up with a Burger King -esque revolving employee door. Employers will be fighting for the good employees and be willing to pay whatever it takes to keep them.
4 posted on 09/04/2002 11:14:19 AM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Proponents say the higher wage is desperately needed by a work force that often is trapped in low-paying service jobs.

Of course, they are low paying because of the size of the pool of potential employees and because of the "no skill, no intelligence required" nature of the jobs. But, in a socialists mixed-up mind, those without skill or intelligence deserve compensation above and beyond what the market dictates.

5 posted on 09/04/2002 11:15:07 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
So much for local control....
6 posted on 09/04/2002 11:15:55 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdani
upheld the constitutionality of a state law
7 posted on 09/04/2002 11:17:35 AM PDT by m1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: m1911
As pertaining to language in the Louisiana State Constitution.
8 posted on 09/04/2002 11:18:50 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Good. Common sense prevails.

I have often wondered if, in the debate, the issue of cost-of-living should be raised. That is, the minimum wage would be higer in CT than AL and higher in the cities than in rural areas.

9 posted on 09/04/2002 11:19:03 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: m1911
upheld the constitutionality of a state law

Uh, yeah - that's my point.

....of a state law banning local governments....

10 posted on 09/04/2002 11:24:37 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gdani
Why do you have such a problem with State Constitutions prohibiting municipalities or counties from making laws contrary to State law/Policy?
11 posted on 09/04/2002 11:41:08 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Good. If this really worked, all we would have to do is legislate a minimum wage of $50 per hour for everyone, sit back, and enjoy the millenium...

You can't legislate prosperity.

12 posted on 09/04/2002 11:43:54 AM PDT by Viet Vet in Augusta GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Several interesting points about this:

1) Over the 12 Mayoral candidates, Ray Nagin was the only major candidate not to endorse this non-sense. Every other candidate was for it. Of course, Nagin won the election.

2) The campaign regarding the proposal was soooooo intellectually dishonest. The people who voted for it, thought that on Feb 4, they were automatically going to get a $1.00 an hour raise. They were shocked when they showed up for work and their salary was the same.

3) The campaign for this proposal also suggested that if the prosperous folks in the garden district didn't vote for it, there would be a crime wave.

4) 6-1, huh? I'll bet my gal Bernice Johnson was the dissenting voice of socialism on the vote.

13 posted on 09/04/2002 12:02:41 PM PDT by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Why can't these minimum-wage advocates see the folly of what they are doing? If you raise the minimim wage, the cost of labor goes up. If the cost of labor goes up, companies will increase the price of their goods and services. So those making minimum wage will continue to struggle because the price of everything will go up in proportion to whatever the minimum wage is raised up to.

The minimum wage does not occur in a vacuum. If you raise the wages for those at the bottom, you have to raise the wages of a lot of other workers as well.

Here's an example of what I'm saying. Take your average McDonald's restaurant, for instance. You have many of the new employees making the $5.15 minimum wage but you also have others who have been there a little longer making maybe $5.65 an hour or $6.15 an hour. If you suddenly raise those at the bottom to $6.15 an hour then you would need to raise the wages of those making more than minimum wage as well or else you would have a mutiny on your hands. So now you have to pay those making $5.65 an hour $6.65 an hour and those making $6.15 an hour $7.15 an hour. See where I'm going here? You would need to do this all the way up the ladder. You pretty much have to raise everybody in the restaurant by $1 an hour to keep everybody happy and in the same pecking order. If you don't think that will affect the price of a cheeseburger and fries, you're dreaming.

In 1978, I worked at a supermarket where the minimum wage was $2.65 an hour. I got my first raise to $2.75 an hour three months later. Around that time, the minimum wage went to $2.90 and my salary was automatically bumped to $3.00 an hour. So I know for a fact that this is done. Raising the minimum wage will increase wages for just about everybody else too.

14 posted on 09/04/2002 12:03:23 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
The minimum-wage is socialism at it's best.

People should take the initiative to educate themselves and discover their talents and then work hard in that profession. Then they'll make money instead of whining for Mother Gov't to force employers to pay them for what they're not worth.

15 posted on 09/04/2002 12:04:01 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Connecticut's minimum wags is a Dollar higher that federal minimum.
16 posted on 09/04/2002 12:06:20 PM PDT by MrNeutron1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
When the socialists in Congress enact a boost in the minimum-wage, companies shrug and simply raise their prices. Employers will retain the more skilled and higher-paying employees because they're not going to pay some loser off the street the same bucks. And then the non-thinking sheeple will whine next year that they're still making feces. Well DUH!

17 posted on 09/04/2002 12:14:26 PM PDT by ServesURight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrNeutron1962
CT's state law probably doesn't prohibit the higher wage rate. (LA state law does as the story says)
18 posted on 09/04/2002 12:14:39 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
To those who have no job: How would you like $10,000?

Well, eliminating minimum wage could provide an extra $10,000 or more per year to someone who is currently unemployed.

More importantly, that person would get experience, and start to build the contacts that will allow them to get access to better-paying jobs.

When you consider that youth unemployment is a jarring 17.7%, (seasonally adjusted numbers for total population age 16-19, figures available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics ), it becomes clear that eliminating minimum wages really means creating new jobs, especially for the young.

19 posted on 09/04/2002 12:27:29 PM PDT by j271
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Proponents of the minimum wage are trading on class envy and nothing more. As long as legislators can control wages they have a strangle hold on voters.

Very few employers want to pay employees the minimum wage. Most would be happy to pay more to good employees. Minimum wage does just what it implies. It keeps wages of good employees at the minimum.

20 posted on 09/04/2002 12:29:01 PM PDT by Artem55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson