Certainly. It would be immediate and controlled. Which is the most suspicious part; this would trigger an immediate pee-test. The coke can be tested on the spot, however, and it will be up to her to prove her innocence to keep from being removed to a cell. That is how it works. That is why she went to jail for posession the last time.
No one is swearing an affidavit for one of two reasons; either procedure is preventing it, or no one wants any skeletons uncovered.
Yeah, but the results of that test cannot be used as evidence of a crime because that would violate her right against self-incrimination.
They found 'coke'. She's now suspected of possession--she's now a suspect and her protection against self-incrimination kicks in and the result of any coerced drug test is not admissable.
This whole think stinks. I think it is a crock and I would say the same thing if this were any democrats daughter or anybody...