Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Outrage as Iraq views UK arms
observer.co.uk ^ | October 13, 2002 | Jason Burke, chief reporter

Posted on 10/13/2002 8:12:17 AM PDT by icantbleaveit

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-209 next last
To: Beenliedto
Desert Storm (Gulf War I) came about after SH invaded his neighbor (which was practicing slant drilling).

Okay, a case can be made that Kuwait was stealing oil from Iraq, but war was not the answer. I'm disappointed that you haven't said that yourself.

His invasion only tookplace after our ambassador had assured him that the US would not react... Saddam was set up.

This is simply not true. Expressing hopes for peace (or whatever was said, I don't recall) does not equate with approval of invasion. It is a well-known factoid that no such assurance took place.

Viet Nam did not become a "big time" was until the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which in fact did not take place.. it was an out-and-out lie prepetrated by LBJ.

True enough. Which lie, I remind those readers of the Democrat persuasion, was told by a Democratic President and embraced whole-heartedly by the Democratic Party, because it meant many, many jobs for democratic factory workers.

Yes, Vietnam may well have stayed "small-time" for a few years more, until North Vietnam and Ho Chi Min grew tired of killing only a few S. Vietnamese at a time. Thank you, I had forgotten about the terrorism practised by Ho Chi Min against the South.

61 posted on 10/13/2002 10:24:52 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: icantbleaveit
Oil money Big Business money Military Arms Makers money

For those that oppose the war, yes, that is exactly right. China wants to continue selling arms to Iraq, Iraq wants to produce the capability of taking over the Middle East and therefore control most of the world's oil, and Russia and France have economic interests in violation of the sanctions.

62 posted on 10/13/2002 10:28:24 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icantbleaveit
Oh come now, old chap! You must know that setting forth upon Iraq without allowing them to stock up on a few "basics" just wouldn't be cricket, now would it?

Just another case of good old English sportsmanship, eh what? ;^)

63 posted on 10/13/2002 10:28:37 AM PDT by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
if it wasn't for those wonderful arms manufacturers you so obviously despise so much.

Where in God's name did THAT come from?

Put words in someone else's mouth, please.

64 posted on 10/13/2002 10:30:36 AM PDT by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
Thanks, I think I need to go wash my hands.

A fairly well-known figure from history sprang to mind at that comment. His name was Pontius Pilate.

But all the handwashing in the world won't remove the stains from the hands of the appeasers and the pacifists every time the Islamists are allowed to strike because of inaction by so-called political leaders. More of the Clinton legacy chickens coming home to roost.

We have a duty on this earth to protect the innocent. Thank God there are people in power at this stage of our history who understand that fact.

65 posted on 10/13/2002 10:42:56 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
OK...it was your fellow traveler that posted this drivel...he was the one who railed at the 'evil arms suppliers'...but since you have allied yourself with his nonsense on every other point...it seems reasonable to jump to the conclusion that you believe all of this anti-American propaganda.

The arguments made by this poster are identical to the arguments (lies) that succeeded in losing the war in Vietnam....and their rhetoric had as its origin the communists themselves.

This is no different...try and turn the attention away from the truly bad players to some imaginary conspiracy of those nasty evil capitalists. What hogwash.
66 posted on 10/13/2002 10:50:18 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The arguments made by this poster are identical to the arguments (lies) that succeeded in losing the war in Vietnam....and their rhetoric had as its origin the communists themselves.

I was against that one as well.

We were lied to in order to get un into it. And we lost almost 60,000 American lives trying to get out of it.

You guys are just itching for a fight, and nothing good is going to come of it.

I guess you don't understand that war is the result of failed policy. It falls on the back of our young american men and women to shed blood for the mistakes of our leaders..

War is the health of the state.

67 posted on 10/13/2002 10:59:59 AM PDT by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
You guys are just itching for a fight, and nothing good is going to come of it.

Yep. They attacked us, killing men, women and children...noncombatants all. And for that they need to be made to pay. If you don't like it, tough. Something good will come of it though...a whole bunch of Jihadists are going to be taking dirt naps.

I guess you don't understand that war is the result of failed policy. It falls on the back of our young american men and women to shed blood for the mistakes of our leaders.

Failure to prosecute this war would be a failed policy...just as it was a failed policy to prosecure war against Hitler before he became strong. Hundreds of thousands of American young people have volunteered to make sure that that isn't what occurs this time.

War is the health of the state.

In America, the people are the state. To succumb to the Islamists would be unhealthy for the American people in the extreme.

68 posted on 10/13/2002 11:09:10 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
In America, the people are the state.

Oh, boy.

69 posted on 10/13/2002 11:15:48 AM PDT by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
It's called self-government...you ought to read up on it some time...the Declaration and the Constitution would be good places to start.

The primary duties of our elected representatives are to protect those documents and the principles they represent, and to protect the lives and the property of we the people.

If you know there's a madman out there who is bent on killing your family, you take the fight to him first--before he has a chance to strike.

There are worse things than war, sir...and the sooner you recognize that fact, the better.
70 posted on 10/13/2002 11:26:42 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The primary duties of our elected representatives are to protect those documents and the principles they represent, and to protect the lives and the property of we the people.

Yes, and they just keep doing a better job of that as time passes.

You just do not get it.

71 posted on 10/13/2002 11:29:25 AM PDT by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
You just do not get it.

Get what? That you can't make a cogent argument against going to war? That you seem to want to ignore that we are faced with an implacable and evil foe who wants to kill every Jew and every American they can get their nail and rat-poisoned bombs next to?

I get all of that very well.

Thank God you are in the minority.

72 posted on 10/13/2002 11:35:58 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Get what? That you can't make a cogent argument against going to war?

That there is no cogent argument for going to war, just a bunch of propoganda and half truths.

That government is notcapable of protecting us, or of even controlling our borders. Just look at what's been going on in the Washington area this past week.

That for the most part, our elected officials are no more interested in protecting and defending the Constitution then they are in not getting re-elected. Just look at what happened to the Contract with America and the Senate "trial" of William Jefferson Clonton.

That the American people and the State are not one and the same, Thank you God!

73 posted on 10/13/2002 12:00:46 PM PDT by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: icantbleaveit
'It is absurd that we are gearing up to fight a war against these people and simultaneously rubbing shoulders with them at an arms bazaar,'

Understatement of the year.

74 posted on 10/13/2002 12:07:07 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled
This war seems to be about protecting innocent lives.

In a pigs eye. This war is about a decade of un-requited revenge. Most of the claims made about Iraq are absolutely false.

75 posted on 10/13/2002 12:08:47 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Iraq has supported and trained Al Quata,

I don't know Al Quata is but you're mistaken according to out own government.

Claim: Iraq is an international sponsor of terrorism.

Reality: According to the latest edition of the State Department's Patterns of Global Terrorism, Iraq sponsors several minor Palestinian groups, the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), and the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). None of these carries out attacks against the United States. As a matter of fact, the MEK (an Iranian organization located in Iraq) has enjoyed broad Congressional support over the years. According to last year's Patterns of Global Terrorism, Iraq has not been involved in terrorist activity against the West since 1993 – the alleged attempt against former President Bush.

Ron Paul - Iraq: Claim VS Reality


76 posted on 10/13/2002 12:14:32 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Beenliedto
That there is no cogent argument for going to war, just a bunch of propoganda and half truths.

You obviously don't know the difference between 'propoganda' (sic) and facts. The fact is that we were attacked, we continue to be attacked, and the threat of future attacks is real and present. We are going to put a stop to it.

That government is notcapable of protecting us, or of even controlling our borders. Just look at what's been going on in the Washington area this past week.

Incapability of government to protect us and our borders is the fault of namby-pamby liberal politicians...the same ilk who would propagate the lying rhetoric that launched this thread.

That for the most part, our elected officials are no more interested in protecting and defending the Constitution then they are in not getting re-elected. Just look at what happened to the Contract with America and the Senate "trial" of William Jefferson Clonton.

So, since politicians have failed, you want them to continue to fail by not fulfilling their duty to protect our security?? Brilliant reasoning.

That the American people and the State are not one and the same, Thank you God!

Guess you never heard of the sovereignty of the American people or self-government...sad.

77 posted on 10/13/2002 12:14:53 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
You obviously don't know the difference between 'propoganda' (sic) and facts. The fact is that we were attacked, we continue to be attacked, and the threat of future attacks is real and present

Put this in breaking news. I've never before heard the claim that it was Iraq that launched the attacks.

78 posted on 10/13/2002 12:19:20 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: icantbleaveit
Then why is Tony Blair(our primary ally) allowing Iraq arms buyers to do this?

They are not allowing anyone to buy anything its an expo you friggen retard. Do you buy computers at a computer trade show? No so get a fu*king clue.
79 posted on 10/13/2002 12:20:07 PM PDT by Brush_Your_Teeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
Okay, a case can be made that Kuwait was stealing oil from Iraq, but war was not the answer.

So why are you not saying that today when it is the US on much less justification is banging war drums?

80 posted on 10/13/2002 12:21:09 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson