Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HOW TO VOTE: MAKE YOUR VOTE COUNT MORE. VOTE SMART!
Self | October 19, 2002 | Auntie Mame

Posted on 10/19/2002 8:46:26 AM PDT by Auntie Mame

Here are a few rules for freedom loving voters going to the polls this November:

1. NRA: Never Reelect Anyone. Voting with this one rule in mind will allow more citizens the opportunity to participate in government, and help eliminate politicians literally dying of old (very old) age while serving. Our founding fathers set up our constitutional republic with a citizen congress in mind anyway.

2. DIF: Don't Ignore Freedom. Ask yourself before marking your ballot, "Will electing this person or passing this proposition give me more or less freedom?" If your answer is more, go for it. If your answer is less, vote "No," or pick the person most likely to value liberty first. If you don't know, LEAVE IT BLANK.

3. LIB: Leave it blank. Believe it or not, you don't have to mark the ballot in every place requested. If you aren't sure what they stand for, LEAVE IT BLANK. Consider this: when 40,000 people vote for the lesser of two evils and that one gets elected, he thinks 40,000 people approve of his program.

4. SOS: Speak Out Silently. If you don't vote, you HAVE cast a ballot. When 20,000 people walk into a voting booth and 15,000 of them actually voted for a high profile office (governor, senator, etc.), believe me, you HAVE made your point loud and clear.

5. DDV: Don't Dilute Your Vote. When the ballot says, "Vote for no more than three (or five, or six)"--typically this is for the election of city council members with several slots up for reelection--you are not obligated to vote for all the slots. In the past, if the ballot said, "Vote for no more than six," I picked the two I knew and liked and four more, chosen randomly based on their gender, occupation or name. This is a huge mistake and your vote is diluted when you do this. Think about it this way: if your neighbor Bob, a good guy, is running for City Council, and instead of voting for him alone, you mark the boxes for five others, you have just given five of his running mates the opportunity to beat him. Again, if you don't know, LEAVE IT BLANK.

6. VFJ: Voting for Judges. Voting for judges is extremely important and most of us don't have a clue who these people are and what they stand for. Once a judge is elected, it is almost impossible to get them off the bench and after enough elections, they simply cannot be removed, no matter how bad they are. They usually don't campaign and to most of us they are just a name on a page. Here's a scary statistic for you: the California Judicial Council (the governing body for judges) has been in existence since 1961. Since it's inception--42 years--guess how many judges have been removed for impropriety? Nine! That's not a typo, in 42 years the governing body for California judges has only seen fit to remove nine judges. These numbers don't lie. Once a judge, ALWAYS A JUDGE. Can you see why your vote is so important? If you don't know them, LEAVE IT BLANK or just say no (more on this later). Let the ones who do know make that important decision. There are ways to educate yourself and one of the best ways is to ask a lawyer friend. They are the ones at the courthouse every day and they see the judges and their fellow attorneys in action. If you trust your lawyer friend's judgment take his advice. Again, if you don't know, LEAVE IT BLANK.

7. JSN: Just Say No. There are many places on the ballot where you are given the option of voting "Yes," or "No." If you don't know, you've asked yourself the question, "Will voting "yes" give me more or less freedom?" and your answer is "I don't know," a "No" vote is your surest bet. You must be careful here, though, because occasionally the sneaky politicians will throw in a curve and a "No" vote will actually be a "Yes" vote. This doesn't happen often but is something to watch out for.

8. SAT: Stay at Home. As Will Rogers said, "Don't vote, it only encourages them." All humor aside, there are times in all our lives when we are just too busy to keep up with the issues. If you've been working two jobs, have a couple of kids in Little League, your wife just left you for another man, your mother finally flew home to Chicago after visiting for six weeks, the dog's been undergoing treatment at the vet, you haven't read a newspaper in six months, and your sample ballot looks like Chinese, STAY HOME. We've all been there and if you make wild guesses you are doing yourself and everyone around you a disservice. You are not being unpatriotic or a bad citizen by staying home and not voting. Those who are up-to-date on the issues and are working for liberty will thank you. Only one issue or politician you are passionate about? Go to the polls and vote for that and walk out. Don't forget, it's not against the law to LEAVE THE REST OF YOUR BALLOT BLANK.

Remember, the right to vote carries with it the right not to vote. When they say, "Vote as you please, but please vote," what they're really saying is, "Condone what we do, keep the status quo."

These simple rules will make your vote a smarter vote. You'll never again walk out of the voting booth wondering if you did the right thing.

See you at the polls!


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Free Republic; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dontdilutevote; justsayno; leaveitblank; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
I'd appreciate freeper comments on this essay. Editing comments are also welcome as I think it should be leaner and meaner.

But no matter what, don't forget these "rules" when you go to the polls. Make your vote count even more, vote smart!

1 posted on 10/19/2002 8:46:26 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
Never Reelect Anyone? What if they've done a good job and you'd like them to continue doing it? Wouldn't it be kinda dumb to not vote for him/her simply because of some retarded rule?
2 posted on 10/19/2002 8:52:40 AM PDT by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diotima; Nick Danger; Bob J; Interesting Times; Black Agnes; firebrand
I'd really really really like your thoughts on this essay.
3 posted on 10/19/2002 8:52:52 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
... Never Reelect Anyone ...
No. I vote for policies, not people. If a person's voting record or actions more closely reflect my goals, norms and values than the challenger, I'm going to vote for that person.
4 posted on 10/19/2002 8:56:50 AM PDT by Asclepius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
I like your sage advice Auntie Mame.

Can you believe I'm actually thinking of voting for a woman judge? I don't think women should have the right to vote;^)

Also, I'll probably do a write-in for a legit candidate who is running a strong write-in campaign. He doesn't stand a chance with all the "Push the Straight Dim Ticket" button voters where I live, but my vote will count anyway.

Thanks again for the nice advice.
5 posted on 10/19/2002 9:00:10 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AM2000
Yes, I agree and I break this rule every two years when I vote for my congressman, Dana Rorhabacher. For one reason, the only person who runs against him is a Democrat. The second reason is because he does an excellent job, I agree with his political philosophy, and he has personally saved me and my neighbors thousands and thousands of dollars (he finally, after about 10 years of work, got the majority of our community removed from the flood map so we don't have to buy $900/yr flood insurance--we get about four inches of rain a year, it was a joke).

However, this mentality is what has kept Senator Byrd in office all these years. A bit of a dilemma, isn't it?

Perhaps the word "rules" is not a good one. Do you have a suggestion for a substitution?
6 posted on 10/19/2002 9:01:29 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
A statesman is an easy man,
and tells his lies by rote.
A journalist makes up his lies,
and takes you by the throat.
So stay at home and drink your beer,
and let the neighbors vote! ;)

-W.B. Yeats
7 posted on 10/19/2002 9:04:01 AM PDT by hapsgroupie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
Sure. Guidelines. Also, instead of 'never' re-elect anyone, just point out the idea of a 'citizen congress' and then let the reader judge for themselves on a case by case basis. Real thinking people don't need rules.
8 posted on 10/19/2002 9:05:24 AM PDT by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Your kind words and encouragement are most appreciated Fred. It's only been the last couple years and with the help of the great minds on FR and the Florida election fiasco in 2000 that I've formulated these "rules." I can't believe I've been voting so stupidly for so long.
9 posted on 10/19/2002 9:07:54 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AM2000
"Guidelines," I love that! Thank you! Really! It's perfect. Why didn't I think of that?
10 posted on 10/19/2002 9:11:14 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
By and large, this is an excellent essay. It goes a bit overboard. Dumping all incumbents is a bit too much. Some of them, on occasion, DO deserve reelection. As a general proposition, however, this is a safer rule.

As the saying goes, "Don't vote. It just encourages them."

Some of the advice is rock solid sound, such as "don't dilute your vote." This is called "bullet balloting" and has been a tactic in the minority (read black) community for decades, in multi-member districts.

For other suggestions in citizen activism to take back America, click on "to Restore Trust in America," below.

Congressman Billybob

This column is based on the fine work by FReepers in a thread on FR. Click for "Ballistics and Bullsh*t"

Click for "Til Death Do Us Part."

Click for "to Restore Trust in America"

11 posted on 10/19/2002 9:12:38 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
Stupid.

The RATS will always re-elect THEIR candidates... and now we have to vote against our own... just because they already hold office?

Vote against good conservatives... just because they already hold office?

This is a prescription for a RAT government.

Either stupid advice... or cleverly RAT-concocted.
12 posted on 10/19/2002 9:20:27 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AM2000
Real thinking people don't need rules.

Ahem. Don't forget, the "real thinking people" of this country put Clinton into office; kept Clinton in office when it was obvious he was a scoundrel; push the "dem" button unthinkingly when they vote; here in California the real thinking people are probably going to reelect Gray Davis, the most incompetent governor ever (although he's an excellent fundraiser). We're not talking about astute judges of character here.

But I know what you're saying. I feel very strongly about NRA but perhaps, even though I think it is the most important guideline for voting, it should be placed at the very end. It's obviously a turn-off and I don't want the reader turned off at the very first paragraph. I hope you will think about it some more, just let it percolate, because I think eventually you'll end up agreeing how important that guideline is.

13 posted on 10/19/2002 9:20:36 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Okay, you don't like guidline No. 1. What do you think of the rest of them?
14 posted on 10/19/2002 9:22:40 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
I think these are very good points, except for the first one. I would like to get rid of some of the ones that have been in office for years, but I do think that experience and age can be positive qualities. I would make this a case by case decision. However, I would like to get rid of some of the dinosaurs such as Kennedy et al.

Talk about voting "stupid", before becoming politically savy, I used to see who the National League of Women voters recommended and would vote for their candidate if I didn't know who to vote for.

15 posted on 10/19/2002 9:23:23 AM PDT by AUsome Joy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapsgroupie
LOL! Thank you. I may use that quote on this essay's next incarnation.
16 posted on 10/19/2002 9:26:39 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
You're quite welcome. :) And thank you for your excellent advice. I'll save this article until I am old enough to vote.
17 posted on 10/19/2002 9:33:23 AM PDT by hapsgroupie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AUsome Joy
I don't think I can top your "stupid" voting, but I can at least equal it. LOL! I've been pondering why I thought I had to fill in every single blank on the ballot and I think it goes back to public school. We were taught there to fill in all the blanks or we'd be penalized. I think subconsciously I thought if all the blanks weren't filled in my ballot wouldn't count.
18 posted on 10/19/2002 9:35:07 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Thank you for your input, Congressman. I always take your comments on the forum to heart. Also, I didn't know about bullet balloting. Very interesting.
19 posted on 10/19/2002 9:40:26 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
Pointless, at best.

Look, every contest is a choice. Although I agree some of the ballot propositions might best be left blank, in general I'd have to say, look at the merits of each vote you cast, not on the basis of some list of "rules" but in terms of the comparison of each choice.

Is candidate A better for our cause than candidate B?

That's the only question.

If the answer is yes, vote for A. If B, vote for B.

If they are "exactly equal"... I find that hard to believe, and very rare if it indeed ever does occur.

I hate to quote a leftist mass-murderer but I've never read it put any clearer than this:

"We must unite with our real friends to fight against our real enemies."

Many of our "friends" (depending on the only available choice in any particular vote) might fail one or more items on your LIST.

But be sure of this: our enemies are not using any High Ethical Standard. They are just trying to win.

When the Immigrant Invasion and the Vote-Fraudulent DemocRATS bury us, they also will bury your useless, pointless list.

Forget lists.

Vote Conservative.

Vote Often.

20 posted on 10/19/2002 9:44:19 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson